Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

On the matter of PRCFX

2»

Comments

  • edited January 21
    my bad, was reading optimistically, evidently

    edited

    >> I've found little redeeming value in using Merrill.

    PRWCX is buyable and also NL/NTF (it says)
  • That's certainly a plus.

    It's always interesting to find the quirks in brokerage fund offerings. While PRWCX appears to be available at Merrill, the subject of this thread, PRCFX curiously is not. Likewise, DODLX is not available at Merrill though it sells other D&C funds.

    Hard to tell what's going on without a scorecard.
  • Derf said:

    This thread leads me to ask, what % of PRCFX should a 76 year old retired gent hold? Better yet what % of PRCFX do you hold?

    I'm 70. I've got 2% in it, basically just tracking it for a while. My largest holding is Vanguard's Global Wellesley.
  • @billr. Global Wellesley our biggest holding too. Does the overweight in Financials concern you?
  • Some of that overweighting comes with the territory. Global Wellesley is a large cap value fund on the equity side.

    Since M* doesn't classify allocation funds with respect to value vs. growth, one can look instead at global large cap value funds for a reference. The benchmark index has 24.9% invested in financials, though the category average in only 19.15%. DODWX may be representative here, with a 21.61% exposure to financials.

    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/dodwx/portfolio

    With its 28.95% in financials, Global Wellesley is still overweight as compared with other large cap value funds. Though not as severely as first appeared.
  • @msf. Thanks for your comment. Given current circumstances being overweight in that sector concerns me. The problem with Balanced funds is that something will always be not to my liking.
  • >> something will always be not to my liking.

    What to do!
  • In theory it’s easy. One US value fund. Add one international Value fund in the exact same proportion I desire. The two of them are just the equity allocation I choose. Then two bond ETFs to get the duration and credit quality that’s perfect for my taste. That’s it. My perfect one fund solution in four parts. Then next month I can begin second guessing four choices instead of one. And my dear wife will scream after I depart the scene.
  • @Davidrmoran thanks for stimulating a thought exercise for me. That was actually very helpful in reducing my perpetual cognitive dissonance.
  • good to hear (have you looked at AO_ group?), but I was only teasing about your clear if unregistered investing OCD
  • VGWIX has appx. 60% bonds, and 38% stocks, of which 22% are US. What about the bonds? What % of bonds are international, if any?
  • VGWIX has appx. 60% bonds, and 38% stocks, of which 22% are US. What about the bonds? What % of bonds are international, if any?

    It looks like 60%, but I may not be properly using their widget.
  • edited January 24
    AAII website shows 34% of total assets are domestic bonds and 25% are foreign bonds. So answer to @Soupkitchen, 42% of bonds are foreign.

    https://www.aaii.com/fund/ticker/VGWIX
  • Thanks. I didn't know about aaii.com I do now.
  • edited January 24
    The current VGWIX Fact Sheet indicates 57.1% of the fund's bond allocation was in U.S. bonds.
    Foreign bonds comprised 42.9% of the fund's bond allocation as of 12/31/2025.

    https://advisors.vanguard.com/assets/corp/fund_communications/pdf_publish/us-products/fact-sheet/F1496.pdf
Sign In or Register to comment.