A major discussion of the conduct of the Presidency of the United States, which in the long run will most certainly have a significant effect on the financial and investment affairs of this country, has been abruptly censored.
That discussion has 57 comments and well over 700 views, suggesting that it was of interest to a significant number of MFO members. Interestingly, more than 100 of those views took place AFTER the censorship occurred.
Since it is probable that this act of censorship was instigated by a complaint (or complaints) from an MFO member (or members) it would be very interesting to compare those minority numbers to those generated by the post itself.
Additionally, it is unacceptable that one member should be allowed to, with impunity, violate the rules regarding proper classification of posts, while frequently criticizing others for the same offense.