It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Link to report in The GuardianAttorney general Merrick Garland plans to hold a press conference at 2:15 pm eastern time, following reports that he will name a special prosecutor to decide whether to bring charges against Donald Trump and his allies.
Beyond just the investigation into government secrets Trump allegedly retained at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Politico reports that the special counsel will also look into Trump’s attempts to undermine the 2020 election. The justice department has not yet announced who they will be appointed to job.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla
Comments
Garland to Name Special Counsel for Trump Investigations
White House officials say they had no involvement in the special counsel decision.
It's important to note that a Special Counsel is not the same as an Independent Counsel. A "Special Counsel" is usually someone who is considered to be highly qualified and politically neutral, and not a regular employee of the Justice Department. Typically, after a preliminary investigation by lawyers who are regular employees of the Justice Department, he or she will be hired to assume command of that investigation and those employees.
Since this Special Prosecutor is not a regular Justice Department employee, the presumption is that they are insulated from the normal internal department politics and biases. Nevertheless, they still report to the Attorney General, in this case, Merrick Garland. Also, since they are assuming command of Justice Department personnel who have done the preliminary work on the case, there should be little time lost in continuing that operation.
An "Independent Counsel" is someone hired to initiate, control, and pursue a specific inquiry into a clearly defined legal matter. That operation is funded by the Government, but is not under the direct control of the Justice Department. Because of that, such inquiries can (and sometimes do) go on for an unspecified and essentially unlimited period of time. That was clearly demonstrated by the infamous Whitewater investigation conducted by Ken Star from 1994 to 1998 in his prosecution of Bill Clinton.
Given the time constraints in the Trump investigation, it would be impossible to turn that over to an essentially uncontrollable Independent Counsel.
How can this man who fomented an insurrection and deliberately mishandled sensitive government
documents (and may have obstructed justice) be allowed to run? This is a mockery of our democracy.
From https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/11/18/us/trump-garland-special-counsel:
"Even though Mr. Garland cast his decision as an effort to ensure public faith in the impartiality in the department’s investigations of Mr. Trump, it remains unclear if Mr. Smith’s appointment will influence public perception in a meaningful way."
I understand why Attorney General Garland appointed a special counsel.
Trump and his acolytes will nevertheless still contend this is a "witch hunt" initiated by the Democrats.
"Repeatedly calling the appointment 'unfair,' Mr. Trump said, 'They want to do bad things to the greatest movement in the history of our country, but in particular, bad things to me.'”
Trump is a master of "playing the victim" and not accepting any responsibility for his actions.
People who believe his was the "greatest movement" are delusional.
As a result of these investigations, "The Donald" may finally face real consequences for his unlawful behavior.
This is a man who belongs in the Big House and not in the White House.
I followed the hearings and analysis very closely, and the mob scene and its violence was merely cover...a smokescreen for the plot to delay the Electoral College vote count with the fake electors as the reason. The number of people who are in peril is quite high...enough that the current GOP majority in the House may be in jeopardy. After all, 8 GOP representatives didn't pursue pardons from then-President Trump for no reason.
As for Jack Smith's other focus, the stolen National Defense material...that's open and shut. A clear violation and one in which Jack Smith has prosecutions to fall back on for that same precise crime.