It will not be possible for the Dr. Fauci’s of the world to dismiss Professor Giuseppe Tritto as a crank.
Not only is he an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology who has had a stellar academic career, but he is also the president of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies (WABT), an institution founded under the aegis of UNESCO in 1997. In other words, he is a man of considerable stature in the global scientific community. Equally important, one of the goals of WABT is to analyze the effect of biotechnologies - like genetic engineering - on humanity.
In his new book, this world-class scientist does exactly that. And what he says is that the China Virus definitely wasn’t a freak of nature that happened to cross the species barrier from bat to man. It was genetically engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 (high-containment) lab in a program supervised by the Chinese military.
Click on the link to continue to read ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/renowned-eu-scientist-covid-19-was-engineered-china-lab-effective-vaccine-unlikely
Comments
"Dr Benjamin Neuman is a virologist with 24 years experience in studying coronaviruses. He was part of the taxonomy study group that named the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19."
Much more experienced and well known virologists do not agree this was a manipulated virus and have evidence to back this
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
I would put far more credence in an article in the world's most premiere peer reviewed journal than in a book written in Italian by a man with no experience in virology
If you can read a balance sheet, or make investment decisions based on economic data you should be able to apply the same rigorous methodology to Covid . But I have Ivy League trained Doctor friends who would never treat a patient without reviewing the scientific evidence, buy into these conspiracy theories whole hog and parrot everything you know who says. Other lawyer relatives insist for years that Climate Change is " a plot" by "scientists" to increase their grant funding. They refuse to read Nature or Science or PNAS articles position papers or anything else that might change their minds.
Recently Dr. Harvey Risch has pushed back on the design of hydroxychloroquinine studies that claim to show the drug doesn't work. Risch says they were poorly designed. Spend enough time reading science papers (and it really doesn't take much time at all) and you'll learn that this is a favorite topic for scientists.
Go to pubmed.gov and you will discover that Risch has his name attached to 292 studies. How about the "renowned" Giuseppe Tritto? Just one. It's from 2004: Robotic technology applied to meet the requirements of tools to support microsurgery and cellular surgery.
People that want to learn more about the organization Tritto is president of might try sifting through this mess of a website.
Or, they can look at his linked in page. There you can discover: No doubt that these are worthy and needful skills. But scientists (like many others) do love to question each others credentials when they step outside their area of expertise to venture an opinion. Dr. Ben Carson is a talented surgeon, but I wouldn't seek his opinion on Egyptian pyramids. For that we have archaeologists and Egyptologists.
I wonder what scientists like Risch and Tritto think about climate change. Most scientists believe it is cause by human activity. But you can always find scientists that disagree.
Would you be meaning those doctors who have devoted their lives to public safety and the exploration and investigation of epidemiological disease?
Why would anyone listen to "the Dr. Fauci’s of the world" when there's an alternative doctor with no particular experience in the field? Sure... let's go with that guy... hell, he must be good or zero hedge wouldn't be pushing him.
Jesus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Lindell#:~:text=Mankato, Minnesota, U.S.&text=Michael James Lindell (born%20June,%22the%20My%20Pillow%20guy%22.
Anderson Cooper really grilled Michael Lindell during his interview.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerium (or Oleandrin)
now that's funny
we need a comedy heading, also a zerohedge fantasy heading
Speaking of facts and data, Mrs. Ruffles works for a company one of whose claims to fame is a measure of how well respected a researcher’s work is. This is based on the number and type of research articles the researcher has published (as well as the quality of the publication in which it was published), how often they have been cited by other research articles, and the context in which they have been cited, among other data and analysis that are trade secrets.
I could ask her to run Dr. Tritto through her system but as someone with an analytical background (and some exposure to scientific research and biotechnology), I’m pretty sure we would come up with what scientists refer to as a Big Fat Goose Egg.
He's a urologist into microsurgery and robotics. I won't claim to know how to evaluate his credentials in the world of urology.
Most of his publications are conference proceedings, not even a journal let alone Nature, JAMA, The Lancet, or even any major urology journals. Also the second column entitled “CITATA DA“ is how many times each of his articles was cited. He only has one in double digits and that’s only 15.
They're covering it too.
Yeah. The Russkies are pushing it for their own reasons. But the fact is, it's out there anyway since the book is published. And the publisher, Edizionni Cantagalli, is deeply connected to, or owned, by the Roman Catholic Church.
I don't know how you convince someone that they're being duped by the Russkies when they can say "See. The Catholic Church agrees with me."
I'm open to suggestions.