FYI: New data released this week from the Internal Revenue Service on Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) most notably includes who contributed to IRAs and how much for tax year 2015. Taxpayers contributed nearly $40 billion to IRAs in 2015, indicating that tax-neutral savings accounts will continue to be an important source of capital income. Expanding and simplifying their structure would broadly benefit many Americans.
Regards,
Ted
https://taxfoundation.org/new-irs-data-shows-ira-contributions-made-middle-class-taxpayers/
Comments
https://taxfoundation.org/new-irs-data-shows-ira-contributions-made-middle-class-taxpayers/
This is old news (dated April 26th), though it seems that Ritholtz just picked this up today.
The headline isn't clear whether it's counting dollars contributed or just contributions in any amount. It is the former - not quite 50% of the total dollars contributed to traditional and Roth IRAs in 2015 came from individuals with AGIs under $100K. (Though if an individual was married filing jointly, the IRS attributed the total combined income separately to each spouse.)
It's not a particularly meaningful statistic. There are relatively few wealthy taxpayers and their contributions are capped at $5500 or $6500. So it's virtually impossible for the amount of dollars they contribute to exceed that of many more small contributions by the middle class.
According to the IRS tables, at most 10,668,441 "taxpayers" contributed to either a traditional IRA or a Roth in 2015. The precise number is less, because this figure double counts those who contributed to both.
These 10M contributors are but a small fraction of the 157M taxpayers eligible to make IRA contributions. That's at best a 7% participation rate. So while "tax-neutral savings accounts will continue to be an important source of capital income", that seems to apply to just small minority, however one wants to characerize them.
Sources (IRS Excel tables): 157M eligible taxpayers, and contribution/AGI data
The poor must always help the rich to stay rich and get richer.
Hedges, the Nobel (correction: Pulitzer) winner for Journalism, knows a thing or two:
This presentation was given in Canada.
Near the start, he asserts: "You don't have to spend three years in Harvard divinity school to figure out that Jesus didn't come to make us rich." Yup. But this presentation is political, not religious.
Regards,
Ted
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hedges
Regards,
Ted