FYI: As investors search for bargains in a world of overpriced assets, they should be guided by the EMH.
That isn’t the Efficient Market Hypothesis, which holds that the price of a security reflects all available information. It’s my own Emetic Market Hypothesis, which says if the mere thought of owning an asset turns your stomach, that’s probably a sign you should buy
Regards,
Ted
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/05/27/hold-your-nose-and-buy-europe/
Comments
In the longer term European exporting companies probably will not fare well when you consider the competition from Asia. What will do well are companies that focus on the tourist trade with a weaker Euro and a lot of rich Asians traveling.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2015/01/16/investing-international-funds/21825245/
Regards,
Ted
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sp-500-companies-generate-barely-over-half-their-revenue-at-home-2015-08-19/print
The last time both of those were running in the right direction for a U.S. investor was in the 'noughties, and it lasted long enough that even I realized it and made $ hand over fist in plain old VEURX and TRP's EM stock and bond funds:
https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/DTWEXM (set the time frame to "maximum")
No wonder that over the last 5y, currency-hedged FMIJX ranks in the top 1% of foreign large blend funds (that, and very little invested directly in EMs), but as good as the FMI guys are, it still trails the S&P 500 by a lot.