Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

«1

Comments

  • @MFO Members: Great news, Monday should be a great day to buy ! The side-show continues.
    Regards,
    Ted
  • edited July 2015
    And the vote wasn't close.

    Ted, your comment reminds me of something Cramer said last week when the market was diving, and folks bought after the first 60 minutes on what they interpreted as a slight weakness. If you want to buy the dips, you should wait until the market actually dips.

    I plan to sit back and do nothing for a bit.
  • Hi guys!
    I must agree with the Linkster....Monday is a buy day. All markets should be down. An international or global fund maybe as the dollar might strengthen. This week should be interesting---with China in the mix. Things are happening that can't be marked to a market price. As they say, the spread is your friend.
    the Pudd
  • edited July 2015
    Monday? Ever hear the tale of the falling knife?
  • IMHO you should not try to be a hero. The early bird may catch the worm but the early worm gets eaten . Best to wait till Thursday at which point the fog will probably lift and while there will be risk you may be able to evaluate it.
  • Hopefully this will be the beginning of a healthy forest fire. A good 10-20% drop would be nice.
  • edited July 2015
    Good one Brian. Maybe a "controlled burn"?
    :)

    A good day for CNBC ratings.
  • I read that CNBC will go live Sunday night.
  • edited July 2015

    I read that CNBC will go live Sunday night.

    CNBC is live currently.
  • I guess it is Sunday night there.:-)
  • We could get some good buying opportunities out of this.
  • Well, the Greek Finance Minister just stood down. Shanghai has lost a lot of steam.
  • Give me Malox. China could potentially be a much bigger issue.
  • Yep, the infusion benefits were short lived. Nikkei and Hang Seng are going down big. Europe coming up next.
  • Futures about half as bad as they were last night.

  • It is changing by the hour. The losses so far are no worse than any down day we have had in the past few months.
  • Now is a good time to review your portfolio and to see which asset class/funds held up.
  • Ho-hum. I'm not sure we'll know anything until the end of the day if then.
  • I think I heard that July 20 is the next day that a payment is due. Maybe they will work out something before then.

    Interesting how some of the media portray Germany as a bully. Germany decided they wanted proof that Greece was doing something about their debt. Greece just wants to hit the reset button and start over as if nothing happened.
  • edited July 2015
    Sell-off over I guess. lol. Market moving positive and HC doing particularly well.
  • edited July 2015
    @Mark noted: "Ho-hum. I'm not sure we'll know anything until the end of the day if then."

    While I don't plan to exit this planetary boundry just yet; I don't know there will be a satisfactory "fix" before it is time for me to "leave".

    Catch
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Greece reminds me of my wayward daughter who borrows money from me, makes one or two payments, and then forgets about repayment.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [reposted]

    No, accepting austerity conditions, whatever they are, will not have any efficacy, and did not in the past. You absolutely cannot 'austere' your way here to economic improvement or economic health.

    Wolfgang Munchau today in FT:
    If you have been unemployed for five years, with no prospect of a job, it makes no difference whether the money you do not get is denominated in euros, or in drachma.


    Greece is more like a child who cannot find work. And if she is wayward and I lend to her, I am a larger part of the problem. She did not do any stealing from my wallet. And there is zero way for her to help herself in this situation; moreover, she already has done a ton to help herself. All respected economists writing today concur.

    ' ...most — not all, but most — of what you’ve heard about Greek profligacy and irresponsibility is false. Yes, the Greek government was spending beyond its means in the late 2000s. But since then it has repeatedly slashed spending and raised taxes. Government employment has fallen more than 25 percent, and pensions (which were indeed much too generous) have been cut sharply. If you add up all the austerity measures, they have been more than enough to eliminate the original deficit and turn it into a large surplus. So why didn’t this happen? Because the Greek economy collapsed, largely as a result of those very austerity measures, dragging revenues down with it.
    And this collapse, in turn, had a lot to do with the euro, which trapped Greece in an economic straitjacket. Cases of successful austerity ... typically involve large currency devaluations that make their exports more competitive. ... But Greece, without its own currency, didn’t have that option.'
    (Krugman last week)
  • edited July 2015
    Just some idle thoughts...

    One of the often-touted advantages of the American business mindset is the ability to declare bankruptcy, get up off the floor, and try again. Quite a few American financial heroes have business failures in their past record.

    Different mindset if you're not American and not in business, though. Why is that?
    ... ... ... ...

    Lending money to a close family member when the probability of payback is nonexistent is one thing: there are lots of other offsetting emotional factors working there. I notice no examples of individuals advancing loans to total strangers when the probability of payback is nonexistent.

    Yet lots of large financial entities have advanced loans under similar circumstances to Greece, when it's been painfully obvious for decades that the odds of repayment were poor-to-none. Now everyone seems to act as if this is a surprise. Why is that?
    ... ... ... ...

    While traveling in a country and asking lots of questions it's not too hard to form general impressions of that country. As I've noted before Greece has no significant industrial or international commercial base. It is a fractured small-agriculture, small shop-owner, tourist service oriented economy.

    If I could figure this out in three or four weeks why should we be upset that the "professionals" who failed to perform due diligence are now squealing in dismay?
    ... ... ... ...

    Greece and Italy never met the requirements for and should never have been admitted to the EU. That was certainly no secret at the time: it was widely observed in financial discussions. Creditors pretended that all was well though, because NATO needed presence in the Mediterranean.

    Greece's financial situation is now important, because we evidently don't need Greece so much for military purposes (although that may prove to be very short-sighted, due to Mr. Putin's ambitions). You think possibly a cynical double-standard here?
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • We've all heard enough reasons why a country's budget should not be analogized to a household's. (For example, if they were similar, then one could "dynamically score" a household budget, and claim that losing a job - like cutting taxes - would increase household income.) Likewise, countries are not businesses. A country's raison d'être is not profit.

    So these analogies don't work well for me.

    Nevertheless, to address a couple of items:

    - People throw money at companies (strangers) all the time. They put on blinders and hope and wish for some good outcome. Look at all the money lost in the dotcom bust on companies that didn't have a business plan, a market, a prayer.

    - Bankruptcy/restart. IMHO it's a cultural thing (possibly legal as well, e.g. Puerto Rico). If you're immersed in the culture (e.g. Silicon Valley), bankruptcy is something you put on the table and talk about, even if you decide not to go through with it. Elsewhere, people seem to feel that there's some sort of stigma attached, whether it's moral, or a black mark on their resume, or whatever. Any mention of the possibility is hushed up.

    In the US, at least, bankruptcy is designed to eliminate that stigma and offer a fresh start. If you don't understand that, if you're not living in that culture, you tend to avoid even discussing bankruptcy, regardless of how much sense it makes.

    I've been through too many failed companies. The stories I could tell. I'm sure my lawyer (if I had one at the moment) would be advising me I've said too much already:-)
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
Sign In or Register to comment.