I must confess that my efforts to create a tradable market indicator have come to naught and I have shelved the project. Try as I have done over the past few months of market declines - failing at my MF, CEF, ETF, and stock picks - I am also unable to predict how the market will do based on the color of the dress worn by Kelly Evans of CNBC. Not only was I sure I could make this indicator work, I was also planning to figure out a way to infiltrate the channel's wardrobe department so that I could front run the indicator. This is what market declines do to a sound mind or in the words of one song I like, "Chalk It Up to the Blues."
Comments
Rest just talk their books even if they think what Bogle thinks privately.
I am currently finding that stocks are currently a little oversold but not enough for me to go on a buying spree. I bought a little at 1922 and again at 1880. For me to buy again anytime soon I'll need to see a decline to about 1820 on the S&P 500 Index. At the current time I'm about 23% cash, 22% bonds, 50% stocks (35% domestic & 15% foreign) and 5% other according to a recent Xray analysis.
It's interesting that a fund that I am invested in (CTFAX) has been raising it's allocation to stocks as they decline; and, it will begin to reduce its allocation to stocks, raising it's allocation to bonds, as stock valuations recover and prices move upward. I generally follow P/E Ratios as my guide and the fund follows the price action of the S&P 500 Index.
For those interest more information on CTFAX is linked below.
https://www.columbiathreadneedleus.com/content/columbia/pdf/LIT_DOC_3C97987F.PDF
Thanks for the question.
Maintain my current allocation to cash, perhaps even increase it, until the TTM P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 Index scores a reading of 20 or less. With a reading above 20 stocks are said to be overbought and a reading below 20 indicates stocks are becoming oversold.
Currently, the TTM P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 Index as reported by the WSJ is 21.4 as of this past Friday market close with a price reading of 1880. It's interesting, that forward estimates are reported to be 15.9.
This strategy somewhat follows the Rule of Twenty.