Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
I see the issue as putting massive strain on the economy in the face of inflation. Our current energy price surge is likely to add to inflation and economic slowdown. This makes lower FED funds rates unacceptable. GDP has been falling and is approaching zero, another lower GDP print would be very bad.
Slow growth plus inflation, puts the FED in a very awkward position. Besides the FED funds rate, they could do what, that would help with that situation? Not a rhetorical question, a real one.
Now supposing that the Hormuz issue were settled quickly. And that the WH decided to scale back tariffs significantly. And the FED held steady. I assume markets would rejoice. I think that jobs/hiring might still be a problem though.
Do the 4.4% "unemployed" have the skills needed in the current marketplace? Will AI take more white collar jobs? My guesses are "no" and "yes".
Comments
Slow growth plus inflation, puts the FED in a very awkward position. Besides the FED funds rate, they could do what, that would help with that situation? Not a rhetorical question, a real one.
Do the 4.4% "unemployed" have the skills needed in the current marketplace? Will AI take more white collar jobs? My guesses are "no" and "yes".
I am retreating and build up my cash until the Iran war ends.
Quite right. And anything the FED does decide to do in any scenario is always muted and indirect, like pushing the string across the table, eh?