It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
While Republicans have sought to blame Democrats for the potential loss in benefits that people who make little money rely on, those who work in the food-insecurity space say that is misleading because Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act already eliminated almost $187bn in funding for Snap through 2024, according to a congressional budget office estimate.
Should funding run out at the end of the month, “we will have the greatest hunger catastrophe in America since the Great Depression, and I don’t say that as hyperbole”, said Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America. Snap supports working families with low-paying jobs, low-income people aged 60 years and older and people with disabilities living on a fixed income, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Snap participants generally must be at or below 130% of the federal poverty line. The average participant receives about $187 a month, the center reports. The Department of Agriculture recently sent a letter to regional Snap directors warning them that funding for Snap will run out at the end of the month and directing them to hold payments “until further notice”.
More than 200 Democratic representatives have urged the USDA to use contingency funds to continue paying for Snap benefits. “There are clear steps the administration can and must take immediately to ensure that millions of families across the country can put food on their table in November,” a letter from the lawmakers to the USDA states. “SNAP benefits reach those in need this November would be a gross dereliction of your responsibilities to the American people. We appreciate your consideration of these requests.”
Democrats have refused to pass a funding resolution to reopen the government because they want the legislation to include provisions to maintain healthcare subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which the Trump administration cut and are set to expire at the end of the year.
A USDA spokesperson blamed Democrats for the upcoming loss in Snap benefits: “We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats,” the spokesperson told Fox News. “Continue to hold out for healthcare for illegals or reopen the government so mothers babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive timely Wic [special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children] and Snap allotments”.
That claim is inaccurate¹: undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Affordable Care Act subsidies.
While his organization is focused on food insecurity, Berg supports the Democrats in fighting for healthcare subsidies because “this has grave repercussions for the people we represent”. “The population getting the healthcare subsidies may have a marginally higher income than people getting Snap, but there is certainly a lot of overlap,” Berg said.
The profile of a Trump supporter:Brittany, a 38-year-old mother of three, lives in Greenup, Kentucky, and works 35 to 40 hours each week as a home health nurse. She also has received Snap benefits for a few years.
“It’s not like I receive benefits and not work,” said Brittany, pushing back against the misconception that people who receive food stamps just sit on the couch. They allow her to get “most of the necessities throughout the month and then I just pay cash for the rest of them”, said Brittany, who did not want her last name used.
If the Snap funding is cut off, she said, she would have to work on the weekends to make up the difference, which would mean she would have “hardly any time with my children”.
Still, she supports Trump and blames Democrats for the shutdown because “they are not agreeing on anything that the Republicans offer”.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla
Comments
My uncle used to get some grins when, in a conversation, he'd reply with: "I don't follow your non-sequitur."
But in addition, the economics isn't really all there is to the story; MAGA is married to the culture-war arguments on the Right. They vote as much with that stuff in mind as anything else. Good, upstanding, white, righteous, "saved" evangelical "Christians" of that ilk are convinced that their eternal souls are at stake. They MUST--- as mandated by Jesus Christ--- stand on that hill and die fighting the good fight.
As everyone in here knows, I'm a Christian, but of a different ilk. And the advantage I can see that clearly they cannot, is that Jesus Christ did not ever preach the stuff they so mightily cling to and claim to represent: the myth of Rugged Individualism. The Myth of Christian Nationalism. The Myth of American Exceptionalism, tied to the idea of Manifest Destiny. That gay and trans is evil and sinful and an abomination. (I want to slice the bologna a bit thinner and make some distinctions, there. Still, everyone must be left to live their lives by their own lights, in the end.) The crazy idea that Orange Trumpy was "chosen by God." (gag and vomit.) Theirs is a "Christianity" disconnected from the heart of the gospel. And maybe the clearest indication of that is the fact that they can so conveniently segregate their politics from their faith, despite the Christian assertion that faith ought to inform the way we live, including our political choices.
...Well, THAT, and Fox "News!"