Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Media including Fox News overwhelmingly reject Hegseth press policy

edited October 14 in Off-Topic
Following are excerpts from a current report in The Washington Post:
Fox News, along with ABC, CBS and NBC, did not sign the Defense Department’s press policy by Tuesday’s deadline, having earlier in the day denounced the new regulations in a joint statement that included CNN, which previously said it would not sign.

Fox’s dissent is notable considering the Trump-friendly views of many of its opinion hosts, whose ranks previously included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. As of Tuesday’s 5 p.m. deadline, only the MAGA-friendly One America News had said it would sign the policy.

The TV networks joined many other outlets in saying no, including The Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press, Reuters, Bloomberg News and the Atlantic. Right-wing outlets including Newsmax, the Washington Times and the Washington Examiner also declined to sign, along with a raft of defense-related trade publications. A list of outlets’ stances on the rules is below.

News outlets’ stances on the Pentagon’s new media rules:

Signing
• One America News

Refusing to sign
• ABC News
• Air & Space Forces Magazine
• Al Jazeera
• AL-Monitor
• Associated Press
• The Atlantic
• Aviation Week
• Axios
• Bloomberg News
• Breaking Defense
• C4ISRNET
• CBS News
• CNN
• Defense Daily
• Defense News
• Defense One
• The Economist
• Federal Times
• The Financial Times
• Fox News
• The Guardian
• The Hill
• HuffPost
• Military Times
• MSNBC
• NBC News
• The New York Times
• Newsmax
• NPR
• PBS Newshour
• Politico
• RealClearPolitics
• Reuters
• Task & Purpose
• USNI News
• The Wall Street Journal
• The Washington Examiner
• The Washington Post
• The Washington Times
• WTOP

The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment.

Comments

  • a2z
    edited October 15
    even the rightwing rags (but one) somehow realized there were signing up to unlimited liability for public unclassified information.

    just make it simple and invite them all to hegseth chat groups.
  • Censorship, propaganda & intimidation.

  • edited October 15
    Hegseth doesn’t want someone leaking our (secret) plans to attack Venezuela.
  • @hank- See you in Somalia...
  • edited October 15
    I thought of you tonight OJ when I heard Trump justify using Navy missile firing ships to blow up Venezuelan boats (instead of using the CG to board & search first) because our USCG boats are ”too slow” … Never heard that one before,

    Every day’s a new adventure.
  • Just like everything else in his life he prefers that it be quick, illegal, wrong and dirty.
  • edited October 15
    Hell, if he thinks that they're slow now, he couldn't begin to imagine how slow they were when I was in. Almost every large Coast Guard ship that we had was a very used hand-me-down from the Navy (typically destroyer escorts), with a quick fix-up and nice paint job.

    I have very mixed feelings on taking out those small fast boats- they're basically good-sized speedboats with huge dual outboard engines- that type of boat is used for one thing, and it certainly ain't fishing.

    I realize that it's pushing the envelope legally, but I can understand the concept of those boats being used by interests who, in a practical sense, have declared "war" on US citizens and interests.

  • so the solution seems to be switch to mega-yachts on the off chance trump worries he may be bombing a gop donor \ offshore co-investor ?
  • Glad the media is standing up.
  • Good 1 @a2z !!!! Or a slow fishing boat of one kind or another?
  • edited October 17
    Old_Joe said:

    “I have very mixed feelings on taking out those small fast boats- they're basically good-sized speedboats with huge dual outboard engines- that type of boat is used for one thing, and it certainly ain't fishing. I realize that it's pushing the envelope legally, but I can understand the concept of those boats being used by interests who, in a practical sense, have declared "war" on US citizens and interests.”

    I never thought of that. Umm … As a people we’ve become so politically stratified (right leaning / left leaning) it’s hard to appraise any act by the “opposition” in any light resembling objectivity. I blame the internet (along with some cable outlets) for that. This is the only discussion platform I frequent. But I hear it’s really bad on some others. I wish everyone could take a deep breath and attempt to understand the other’s point of view. Not agree with it. But listen.

    Dickens perhaps foresaw our predicament in 1859 when he wrote the opening lines to A Tale of Two Cities. He was of course referring to London and Paris at the time, but might well have been referring to our present day.

    “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”

    BTW - Those are, for some reason, very easy lines to memorize, were someone so inclined. Doesn’t get any better IMHO. Old Joe could no doubt impress the Mrs by reciting them.:)
  • All good points @hank. Bravo.
Sign In or Register to comment.