Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

The PCE(personal consumption expenditures) price index + Atlanta's Fed Q2 estimated GDP

13»

Comments

  • @Crash
    So, prudently looking ahead and paying attention should just not be a thing?
    Attention to what?
    I always pay attention only to the markets and nothing to politics. I must see it in the price and charts, and when I do, I take action. I'm going from 99+% invested at most times to 99+% in MM sometimes. My record is pretty good.

    @DrVenture
    If the FED does cut rates (stimulatory) and that adds to tariff pressures, we can blame Powell! It appears that Powell isn't falling for it.
    Cutting doesn't mean 1% tomorrow. It means 0.25% tomorrow, and let's see. It's all relative and based on the numbers.
  • edited June 12
    The FEDs dual mandate is jobs and inflation. If both are good, why should Trump be insulting him over rates? Why should they lower? A direct answer will suffice.
  • So who is going to start a new thread on this evening’s events in the Middle East and the impact on oil and stocks in the futures markets,
  • He's no fool, unlike the current White House occupant.
  • It may be important to note that, in the absence of tariffs that are expected to result in $100 billion in added costs to U.S. businesses in 2024, that the FED may already have begun lowering rates. Trump's tariff policy is the reason the FED is on hold. Consequences of Trump's own actions. Cause and effect.
  • edited June 13
    https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/06/11/fmr-fed-governor-mishkin-cpi-data-should-be-taken-with-a-grain-of-salt-heres-why.html?

    Another reliable voice (Former FED governor) says inflation numbers must be taken with "a grain of salt". Too early for the inflation to appear, as many importers are still rolling out pre-tariff supplies/materials that they previously stockpiled.

  • Exactly. The FED governors are no dummy. There is even a possibility of rising the rate if inflation moves upward.
  • edited June 18
    More good news despite many economists.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/under-trump-blue-collar-wages-soar-at-fastest-rate-since-1969

    "Wages for blue-collar workers are up more in the first five months of President Donald Trump’s second term than under any other president since 1969.

    Bessent’s post includes a graph showing 1.7% wage growth for blue-collar workers, defined as nonsupervisory and production workers, during the first five months of Trump’s second term. The next highest wage growth rate for those workers since 1969 came during Trump’s first term, when it hit 1.3% over the first five months."
  • Excuse me if I temper my enthusiasm with the credibility of the source and a cherry-picked data set (YTD growth by president). I'd like to hope that you're correct but my field of reference comes from a pool of blue collar friends who haven't seen any raises at all.

    Credibility of the Daily Wire - "Many Daily Wire stories repackage journalism from traditional news organizations while adding a conservative slant. Fact checkers have said that some stories shared by The Daily Wire are unverified, and that The Daily Wire sometimes misstates facts to advance a partisan view."
  • a2z
    edited June 18
    heavy bifurcation, likely to worsen such that blue vs white collar means less.
    skilled plumbers, welders, electricians,etc...has been rising steeply for 2 decades.
    factory or unskilled workers at the whim of other things...better be on the lucky side of special interests.

    i have a skilled worker friend who was making so much, he closed his own small business and took a 30% paycut to join larger outfit where he had no admin\managerial duties. and he has a family.
  • edited June 18
    ...
  • Whenever possible I like to have the data verified independently by several sources. Having quality content is important. Some sites including Reuters and BBC have degraded in my opinion. Bloomberg is good but it requires subscription.
  • Back to the OP about inflation - "Fed sees its preferred inflation gauge topping 3% this year, higher than previous forecast"

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/18/federal-reserve-dot-plot-and-economic-projection-june-2025.html

    "Federal Open Market Committee participants said at their June meeting that they expect the core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy, to increase at a 3.1% rate in 2025, higher than their prior forecast of 2.8% in March."
  • edited June 18
    It took me a bit to figure out what the purported stats were about. They took the first 5 months (a cherry-picked slice or time) of each President going back to Nixon, the subtracted inflation from nominal wage growth to get "real" wage growth. The. numbers are "enhanced" by the recent drop in inflation, while wage growth itself was nothing particularly out of the ordinary.

    For instance, if nominal wage growth were 4% monthly on average, but inflation went from 3% to 2.3%, the real wage growth would go from 1% to 1.7%. A function of inflation. To conclude that this is Trump's work is laughable, as we were already experiencing wage competition in blue collar industries, and inflation has been trending downward for more than a year.

    No way that Trump brought down inflation in only 5 months with "America First" policies. No causal connection at all, in fact. And the wage growth in nominal terms was already being driven upward and is actually lower than Biden's last year. Hourly wages at 4.1% growth vs 5.5% peak in early 2024.

    What we have here is statistically tomfoolery. P T Barnum level stuff.

    Play with this for a more revealing picture:

    https://www.atlantafed.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker#Tab1
Sign In or Register to comment.