Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Not too surprised at what IMO was unwarranted BUYing today.
Why? Mainly because Katie S had stated yesterday (paraphrasing) that this rally may have enough momo to push a wee bit above her projected target. And it did, despite some pretty rough, but (apparently?) not as rough as expected econ data!
Holding steady with my current plan of attempting to SELL the top of the range and DCAing proceeds back in at/near the bottom of the range. That is, my projected trading range that may or may not fully develop!
MSFT after hours pop, if it holds, may add even more juice to those wanting to BUY at this level. If so, I will likely SELL a bit more tomorrow expecting to re-deploy at lower levels.
"This morning brought the harsh reality of bad economic news and futures are DOWN ~1%-2%. The projected trading range that I am actively trading, now on both the top and bottom of the range, appears to be taking form."
The SP500 closed up 0.15%. Historical data are just that, they can't predict what's next because markets are different.
Woulda best the house on your post! Surprised it took you a few minutes after close.
Ah BS1000! The poster who has NEVER in over of decade of reading his posts, posted ANY trades in anything approximating REAL TIME, but has ALWAYS made the best trade BS can BUY!.
Yo, bub, I will also note that in true MAGAt form you AVOIDED the pretty impressive trades I've made since Y/E 2024, and simply TROLLED in to say something as stoopid as that.
You certainly are a piece of work.
I trust most here might also add a piece of something else as well.
Do tell us your story again how you grew up in that hotbed basketball country of yours, were a legend in your own mind, and have played it at the highest levels known to man for four decades! It's one of my faves!
BTW, are you 100% invested (sic) in Ca$h again? Oh sorry, that's right. We won't know until AFTER the next greatest trade on earth!
Hey, BTW, maybe read my post before your TROLLING post to understand WTF might have happened today.
Or just run off to the admin and report me again as punks are prone to do!
Karen, as expected, you showed up again. It never failed. Who can really follow your trades? You trade 10 times per week using small %.
As always I hope you make a lot of money.
BTW, my T/A guy said 1-2 weeks ago that it's time to buy. The low for the year is probably in, we may visit it again, but it's a great time to buy. The guy doesn't trade in/out of cash as often as you. I'm sure you are better. Do you want to discuss the ticker MAGA.
Please STOP acting like TOT! He can lie and get away with it. YOU cannot!
To your assinine, wild-ass trading allegation... I've put my post-election strategy and trades out there for everyone to see in REAL TIME. I fully documented ALL of my post-Election Day trades noted on this thread on the BSW, Lib Day and/or this thread. Those are it. (Maybe read all that again s-l-o-w-l-y as I trust that sounds VERY foreign to you!)
So...PLEASE show posts of mine that support your wild-ass statement LIE that "You trade 10 times per week using small %."
Do it NOW TROLL!
Or STFU!
I mean it. Do it NOW, or STFU!
BTW, your trades are EASY to follow. They ALL happen AFTER THE FACT and they ALL are the greatest trades known to man!
As a follow up to a comment above about Katie S's statement, here's the quote. Correction, I posted she said this yesterday, she actually said it Monday:
"Our market internals are supportive of a bigger rebound," Stockton told clients in a note on Monday. "Sentiment has recovered meaningfully per the Fear & Greed Index, which is back above 25% after becoming deeply oversold earlier this month."
However, according to Stockton, a break above the S&P 500's 50-day moving average would likely be short-lived and ultimately give way to renewed weakness.
"Both the SPX and Nasdaq-100 Index have room to initial resistance at their 50-day MAs, respectively 5625 and 19680, breakouts above which would likely foster additional momentum before the rally fails," she said.
As a follow up to a comment above about Katie S's statement,
Katie Stockton has been managing TACK. I heard many of her opinions...meh. See it's 3 year TOTAL performance...TACK just 15.1+%...even PIMIX beat it with 17.4%...QLEIX made 86.4%. See the chart (https://schrts.co/QgpCSIrP). I also checked the Fear & Greed Index over the years, and it's far from accurate.
Katie Stockton performance fund, TACK. No need to look further.
You made a wild-ass allegation about my trading activity. I asked you to support your BS. Still waiting.
Do it NOW TROLL!
Or STFU!
What don't you understand about that?
Do you understand that if you don't prove your wild-ass allegation when called out on it you're effectively cementing your reputation as a fraud and liar?
I'll give you to the end of today to post the complete support.
Again, we are talking about my trades, post-election to now. Please copy/paste my posts of trades to support your BS statement: "Who can really follow your trades? You trade 10 times per week using small %"
As a follow up to a comment above about Katie S's statement,
Katie Stockton managed TACK. I heard many of her opinions...meh. See it's 3 year TOTAL performance...TACK just 12+%...even PIMIX beat it with 17%...QLEIX made 84+%. See the chart (https://schrts.co/ZjrFaPNz). I also checked the Fear & Greed Index over the years, and it's far from accurate.
As usual, I'm staying on topic.
You were routinely laughed out of serious T/A discussions on M* for years. So your appraisal of a good/bad T/A means little to me.
So basically I'm done posting here until FD1000 provides the support for his wild-ass allegation about my trading activities that I asked for twice on this thread. Or simply admits that he's completely wrong about all that.
Aside: Note that he can't provide it because what he posted simply ain't true.
That'll teach him! Seriously, though, all he has to do to get you to leave is to post something you don't like? That seems sort of counterproductive; no?
Comments
Not too surprised at what IMO was unwarranted BUYing today.
Why? Mainly because Katie S had stated yesterday (paraphrasing) that this rally may have enough momo to push a wee bit above her projected target. And it did, despite some pretty rough, but (apparently?) not as rough as expected econ data!
Holding steady with my current plan of attempting to SELL the top of the range and DCAing proceeds back in at/near the bottom of the range. That is, my projected trading range that may or may not fully develop!
MSFT after hours pop, if it holds, may add even more juice to those wanting to BUY at this level. If so, I will likely SELL a bit more tomorrow expecting to re-deploy at lower levels.
Historical data are just that, they can't predict what's next because markets are different.
Ah BS1000! The poster who has NEVER in over of decade of reading his posts, posted ANY trades in anything approximating REAL TIME, but has ALWAYS made the best trade BS can BUY!.
Yo, bub, I will also note that in true MAGAt form you AVOIDED the pretty impressive trades I've made since Y/E 2024, and simply TROLLED in to say something as stoopid as that.
You certainly are a piece of work.
I trust most here might also add a piece of something else as well.
Do tell us your story again how you grew up in that hotbed basketball country of yours, were a legend in your own mind, and have played it at the highest levels known to man for four decades! It's one of my faves!
BTW, are you 100% invested (sic) in Ca$h again? Oh sorry, that's right. We won't know until AFTER the next greatest trade on earth!
Hey, BTW, maybe read my post before your TROLLING post to understand WTF might have happened today.
Or just run off to the admin and report me again as punks are prone to do!
It never failed.
Who can really follow your trades?
You trade 10 times per week using small %.
As always I hope you make a lot of money.
BTW, my T/A guy said 1-2 weeks ago that it's time to buy.
The low for the year is probably in, we may visit it again, but it's a great time to buy.
The guy doesn't trade in/out of cash as often as you. I'm sure you are better.
Do you want to discuss the ticker MAGA.
To your assinine, wild-ass trading allegation...
I've put my post-election strategy and trades out there for everyone to see in REAL TIME.
I fully documented ALL of my post-Election Day trades noted on this thread on the BSW, Lib Day and/or this thread.
Those are it.
(Maybe read all that again s-l-o-w-l-y as I trust that sounds VERY foreign to you!)
So...PLEASE show posts of mine that support your wild-ass
statementLIE that"You trade 10 times per week using small %."
Do it NOW TROLL!
Or STFU!
I mean it. Do it NOW, or STFU!
BTW, your trades are EASY to follow. They ALL happen AFTER THE FACT and they ALL are the greatest trades known to man!
"Our market internals are supportive of a bigger rebound," Stockton told clients in a note on Monday. "Sentiment has recovered meaningfully per the Fear & Greed Index, which is back above 25% after becoming deeply oversold earlier this month."
However, according to Stockton, a break above the S&P 500's 50-day moving average would likely be short-lived and ultimately give way to renewed weakness.
"Both the SPX and Nasdaq-100 Index have room to initial resistance at their 50-day MAs, respectively 5625 and 19680, breakouts above which would likely foster additional momentum before the rally fails," she said.
See it's 3 year TOTAL performance...TACK just 15.1+%...even PIMIX beat it with 17.4%...QLEIX made 86.4%.
See the chart (https://schrts.co/QgpCSIrP).
I also checked the Fear & Greed Index over the years, and it's far from accurate.
Katie Stockton performance fund, TACK. No need to look further.
As usual, I'm staying on topic.
You made a wild-ass allegation about my trading activity. I asked you to support your BS. Still waiting.
Do it NOW TROLL!
Or STFU!
What don't you understand about that?
Do you understand that if you don't prove your wild-ass allegation when called out on it you're effectively cementing your reputation as a fraud and liar?
I'll give you to the end of today to post the complete support.
Again, we are talking about my trades, post-election to now. Please copy/paste my posts of trades to support your BS statement:
"Who can really follow your trades? You trade 10 times per week using small %"
Good luck with all that.
maligning FD and using crude language is not in best interest of this site.
So basically I'm done posting here until FD1000 provides the support for his wild-ass allegation about my trading activities that I asked for twice on this thread. Or simply admits that he's completely wrong about all that.
Aside: Note that he can't provide it because what he posted simply ain't true.