MFOHome About Commentary Discussions Funds The Best Resources Support Us!

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Categories

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Supreme Court upholds law banning TikTok

hank
edited 11:40AM in Off-Topic
BBC out in front on story

I can sympathize with the users, whether social or business related. Has to hurt. Breaking addictions is very hard and can cause emotional distress and worse. And many use the business feature to support themselves. We are at the intersection of technology and national security. An early chapter.

Heck, I’d ban Facebook, Twitter and all the other non fact-checked crap (and FAUX too). But that’s just my selfish view. Bring back fact-checked newspapers with a sense of public responsibility and some accountability for their claims under the law I say!

Comments

  • gman57
    I recently saw Neil deGrasse Tyson talking about AI and how he thinks it will obsolete social media. He feels people will get so fed up not knowing what is real and what is not real they will abandon it. I think he may be on to something. I use it less and less and mostly to find out what local activities are happening and what my friends might be doing. I ignore more and more social media news all the time.
  • hank
    edited 12:28PM
    gman57 said:

    I recently saw Neil deGrasse Tyson talking about AI and how he thinks it will obsolete social media. He feels people will get so fed up not knowing what is real and what is not real they will abandon it. I think he may be on to something. I use it less and less and mostly to find out what local activities are happening and what my friends might be doing. I ignore more and more social media news all the time.

    I wonder why it is that these social sites can list local activities (I assume political gatherings, cultural & educational events, etc.) but that legitimate local newspapers can’t survive (even with online access)? Is it the sense you’re getting something for nothing when you join Facebook? What’s their business model then? Full of targeted ads? Or paid-off by pervayers of political propaganda? Don’t know. Just wondering. Must have been a “hoot” there during the Prez election campaign. I got my fill with the TV coverage - plus what spilled over on this site.
  • Sven
    edited 3:29PM
    Often there is more than one answers or interpretations to the same piece of data. Fact checking is an essential element of getting accurate and quality information. Critical thinking was taught in my college days. How wrong is Elon Musk about trimming several trillion dollars from the government while he walked back his claims several weeks ago.

    Social media information is nothing more than the individual's comments provided on online articles. Take a look topics posted in here at MFO, comments are often posted with supporting sources and many discussion follows.
  • Old_JoeOld_Joe
    That's why I'm at MFO and at none of those other "social" whatever-they-ares.
  • hank
    edited 5:40PM
    Old_Joe said:

    That's why I'm at MFO and at none of those other "social" whatever-they-ares.

    +1
    Sven said:

    ”Critical thinking was taught in my college days.”

    That’s the essence of education. Any teacher worth his salt works towards that goal. CT can be applied to any subject matter. I suppose some, like the social studies, writing, oral communication and literature, lend themselves more easily. But, really, critical thinking belongs everywhere.

    And, admittedly, it isn’t always taught or emphasized enough.

Sign In or Register to comment.