Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

the enjoyment of being seriously misinformed

edited November 2023 in Off-Topic
(krug)
Right now, self-identified Republicans mostly believe that unemployment, which is near a 50-year low, is actually near a 50-year high, and assess current economic conditions as being worse than they were in 1980, when both inflation and unemployment were much worse than they are now.

Comments

  • How can a political candidate possibly get elected by presenting reasonable arguments if a large percentage of the population appears to be immune to reason? It’s no wonder qualified people disdain seeking office.
  • I enjoy flagging off-topic posts for moderation.
  • WABAC said:

    I enjoy flagging off-topic posts for moderation.

    too funny

    good luck
  • BenWP said:

    How can a political candidate possibly get elected by presenting reasonable arguments if a large percentage of the population appears to be immune to reason? It’s no wonder qualified people disdain seeking office.

    BOOM. You said it!
  • edited November 2023
    LOL. You mean like democrats believing the border is secure and fentanyl is not a problem? Yes, that "large percentage".
  • Gary1952 said:

    LOL. You mean like democrats believing the border is secure and fentanyl is not a problem? Yes, that "large percentage".

    Do you remember who said this one week before the 2016 election?

    The opioid crisis was destroying lives and shattering families. We are going to stop the inflow of drugs into New Hampshire and into our country 100%.
  • msf
    edited November 2023
    How can a political candidate possibly get elected by presenting reasonable arguments if a large percentage of the population appears to be immune to reason?

    Or facts. A poll by The Economist and YouGov last April reported that 80% of Democrats and 81% of independents believe that fentanyl is a very or somewhat serious problem; Republicans were at 89%. Flipping it around, 2% of Democrats believe that fentanyl is not serious at all. Granted, that's twice the 1% of independents and 1% of Republicans holding that same belief.
    https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_LnYz0UF.pdf#page=37 (Page 37)

    Also, 2/3 (67%) of Democrats place some or a little of the blame on the federal government. Only 1/3 (33%) aren't sure or hold the government blameless. For independents the numbers are 71%/29% while a somewhat higher percentage of Republicans, 82%, blame the government.
    https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_LnYz0UF.pdf#page=44 (Page 44)

    Regardless of party affiliation, it's the drug dealers that are most likely to be blamed: Democrats 89%, independents 87%, Republicans 93%.
    https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_LnYz0UF.pdf#page=42 (Page 42)

    Though over 70% of Americans also blame Pharma. (Page 40) Investment implications?

    Being that this is MFO, I like that this poll comes from The Economist.
  • Yes, The Economist is still a pretty decent news source. It's getting thinner, though, just like every other "print" news source that we subscribe to.
Sign In or Register to comment.