Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
MikeW mentioned this fund in another thread. I was going to ask for your opinions on this one, but when I tried entering a "test order" at Schwab it shows open to existing buyers only. Anyway, below is some info from Schwab- it looks to be a pretty good fund.
One thing I've noticed with PKSAX and the other KAR funds is its fairly concentrated, 29 stocks, for a small-cap fund. It owns high quality small-caps so one assumes they are resillient to downturns, but one company blowup here can significantly hurt returns. So few stocks in a small-cap fund would make me nervous, whereas I would feel less so in a blue chip fund where you're investing in big dominant businesses.
These are the key attributes that attracted me to PKSAX. It is the only equity fund that I have found that has the combination of Great owl, consistent strong long term performance (3 year -- 15.9%, 5 year -- 13.9%, 10 year -- 14.9%), what I consider to be reasonable Max drawdowns in both March 2020 of 18.3% and 2022 of 17.7%, and managers who have been in place for a long time (since 2008). It has consistently beaten both its index and its category and does so with a non-traditional approach to sector selection. It has heavy concentrations in both industrials and financials which are quite different from its index. I was able to purchase it through the Thrift Savings plan which is the government's retirement program. I wonder if it might also be available in some other 401k programs. You are right its unfortunately not available at Schwab and Fidelity. Lewis is correct in that it is fairly concentrated, but it has managed that risk to date quite well. I would be very interested if anyone has identified any funds with similar attributes. I think they are rare...
To answer @Old_Joe, there are four share classes: A, C, I and R6. A share class carries a front-end load. That is one of the reasons why I would not buy it unless I can avoid the load.
A shares of lots of funds come load-waived at brokerages. Fidelity has a big stable of them; seems like the LW ones there are mostly from larger fund companies. Don't know about Schwab, but might be worth checking.
A shares of lots of funds come load-waived at brokerages. Fidelity has a big stable of them; seems like the LW ones there are mostly from larger fund companies. Don't know about Schwab, but might be worth checking.
Seems to be no load and no sales change at Schwab.
This A share fund is listed as “closed to new investors”, at Fidelity and sold with front-load waived. This is more common now especially when savvy investors are buying ETF and other low cost equivalents.
When invest through an advisor, the front-load generally may get reduced or eliminated (at some large pre-determined $), advisor fee is also added annually. In the end, layers of “fees”’ adds up quickly. Personally, I much prefer to find cost-effective approaches to invest.
Comments
What that means is you can probably find another fund in their stable that has a similar strategy and reasonably similar results that remains open to new investors. For instance, VKSAX or VMACX are both core funds run by similar or same management teams and open I think to new investors.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/34273/000114420418029523/tv494384_497.htm
https://www.virtus.com/products/kar-small-cap-core#shareclass.A/period.quarterly
To answer @Old_Joe, there are four share classes: A, C, I and R6. A share class carries a front-end load. That is one of the reasons why I would not buy it unless I can avoid the load.
As was said in the early days of the internet and computer technology- "the nice thing about standards is that there's so many to choose from".
Add: Thanks for the info on the share classes- hadn't thought about that possibility.
When invest through an advisor, the front-load generally may get reduced or eliminated (at some large pre-determined $), advisor fee is also added annually. In the end, layers of “fees”’ adds up quickly. Personally, I much prefer to find cost-effective approaches to invest.