I have noticed that unless one is Tom Brady the timing of important life choices are often not optimal. One can sell the boat too soon or too late. One can downsize the home too soon or too late. You get the idea. It’s hard to get it just right. For those of us with spouses who aren’t involved in portfolio design and management how to simplify the portfolio so that it runs on auto pilot may be the next big question. Anyone else thinking about this? For me it keeps coming back to something like Wellesley….. Moderate income and some growth. And the equity allocation fits our current style.
Comments
I’ve heard good things about Wellesley on the board over the years. It appears to be moderate risk with a beta according to Lipper of .38. I’d guess my own do-it-yourself portfolio (age 75) right now to have a beta somewhat lower than that - but have never attempted to measure it. At Lipper / Marketwatch, clicking on “Risk & Return” ” tab brings up a fund’s beta - one measure of volatility.
I think your thinking in terms of late life portfolio positioning is on the right track Larry. As far as the cognitive issues, it’s an area I can’t offer any insights on. I work out daily, eat a healthy diet, etc. etc.
100% VWINX (larryB Portfolio)
90% / 10% VFINX / VFSTX (Bufffet Portfolio)
100% PRWCX (Moderate Allocation Fund)
If we are at high valuations VWINX would provide the best downside protection, but over the long term not the best choice for capital appreciation.
I tend to like the historical performance of a fund like PRWCX. Historical performance doesn't repeat , but I tend to think it rhymes.
1988 -2022 (starting with $100K and a 4% WD rate):
200-2022 (from Tech High) (starting with $100K and a 4% WD rate):
1. I’m not Warren Buffett.
2. To roughly paraphrase Christine Legarde today, “I don’t make unconditioned statements.” So note that I began my response saying “Depends so much on somebody’s situation.” In Larry’s case that would include (among many other factors) the age and health of his spouse as well as his legacy planning.
Aside from the above, Warren Buffett is the “perfect” investor to quote in this thread. Two ways to view it: (1) At 91 he himself may be in cognitive decline and an unreliable source or (2) at 91 he’s testament to our ability to continue making good decisions as we approach the century mark. I have a friend who’s 92 and her mind is sharp as a tack. Unfortunately, it’s the other parts that are giving out.
Would love to hear others debate the pros and cons of Buffett’s advice. All ears.
BTW - Most fiduciaries today allow seniors to designate a responsible individual to make decisions for them in the event their cognitive abilities fail them.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/15/advisors-are-asking-their-clients-for-a-trusted-contact-choose-wisely.html
And we did “bat that one around” quite thoroughly here 8-10 years ago when it was first announced. Geez - would have been sometime in the first 2 or 3 years of MFO’s existence. Thanks @larryB for posting the question. All of us can reflect / learn from this.
For continuation of thread …
Most people who are left with money to manage without any experience or interest should probably hire someone, even if it is expensive