Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Support MFO
Donate through PayPal
huh and hmm, from ~3p on today, google has DJIA around 200 points higher than what it is
Attention to detail please! The Dow was never up anywhere near 499 points today, You got the close right at 24706.35 but the +499 points is from the Wednesday close.
Attention to detail please! The Dow was never up anywhere near 499 points today, You got the close right at 24706.35 but the +499 points is from the Wednesday close.
Right. So why was the djia data feed for google combining two days? It says it's for today, one day. I mean, do it again, put in djia at google.com. Then do it at yahoo.com.
A first.
What kind of 'attention to detail' were you thinking of?
Attention to detail please! The Dow was never up anywhere near 499 points today, You got the close right at 24706.35 but the +499 points is from the Wednesday close.
Right. So why was the djia data feed for google combining two days? It says it's for today, one day. I mean, do it again, put in djia at google.com. Then do it at yahoo.com.
A first.
What kind of 'attention to detail' were you thinking of?
Obviously you don’t monitor the markets intraday. Nothing wrong with that. I would guess the vast majority here don’t either.
Of course I did, and do. And over the entire last 90min-plus, moment to moment and finally at the end of the session, the google data for djia was 150-250 points higher than reality. Period. Thought it was weird, and in my experience unique (online since like 1996 and tracking before that through other means), and so I posted. Alas.
Comments
never seen this before, like two days glommed into one or something
Regards,
Ted
Market Summary > Dow Jones Industrial Average
INDEXDJX: .DJI
24,706.35 +499.19 (2.06%)
Possible news - numnuts
What ever printed - I'll take it for a good week!!
Gary
A first.
What kind of 'attention to detail' were you thinking of?
Regards,
Ted
Love that one @Ted.