There's a lot of negativity here currently about the whole sector. See, e.g. posts in the WFC thread (several painting the whole sector with a broad brush), and my own comments on medical coverage complaints ("but they're no different than many of the others"). So I thought I'd post a few positives.
---
One of my favorite good guys, one that caters to the "working man", is Amalgamated Bank. You can read about their history and service
here. Not mentioned is their leadership in serving women. Back in those halcyon days when America was Great, banks refused to allow married women to open separate accounts. Amalgamated did.
Coincidentally (this is not why I'm posting), Amalgamated today
announced an IPO. Originally completely union-owned, it has been 5/8 union-owned for a very long time. That will now drop to 40%.
---
The long term care policy of a friend's parent lapsed through a series of mail missteps on the part of both the parent and the friend. The insurer had no legal obligation to reinstate the policy (that ship had sailed). But based on the circumstances and extended family history with the insurer, the insurer voluntarily reinstated the policy. I'm not naming the insurer (one of the majors) because this is likely a one-off incident. Nevertheless, sometimes they do the right thing.
---
My neighborhood bank where I have a safe deposit box (and little else) has gotten to know me personally even though I'm in there infrequently. They provide free notary services (they even have a sign posted on their door) at a time when the majors within feet or blocks don't even have notaries.
They are in the process of merging with another neighborhood bank. They explained to customers why they rejected a merger from another bank and why they felt this was a good fit. They have extended hours for the couple of weeks when the systems will be merged, so that they are available in case people have problems. They have communicated every step of the way.
---
None of these are big deals. They just show that not all financial institutions are evil all the time.
Comments
Regards
Ted
Add: It's been my personal experience that the bigger the bank, the more prone to evil it is. And how did some of those big banks get to be so big? By buying out many of the smaller and better local and regional banks, driving out competition and acquiring their customer base.
https://money.cnn.com/galleries/2011/pf/1108/gallery.bank_customers_most_loyal/5.html
After a century in business the bank was acquired by First National Bank of Chicago and I dumped the card. Here's how First Chicago treated its credit card customers around the time it was gobbling up banks (1991): https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/25/business/first-chicago-revokes-credit-cards.html
Evil? Not exactly, but there must be better ways of doing business. Especially when banks claim to be interested in their communities, as they all seem to say.
A board member at a small startup where I once worked later committed (and was convicted of) first degree murder. I was rather surprised when someone told me about it. Based on that, I'd say that evil is harder to recognize than one might think. (The villains don't all come twirling mustaches.)
You never know what sort of person you'll run into if you work long enough.