I considered adding this opinion piece to the "buying/selling/pondering" thread. But I know many go there looking for specific recommendations and didn't want to dilute all the good suggestions there. Caught UBS Chairman Axel Weber interviewed on Bloomberg TV Monday morning. Wish I could link the video, but apparently its's not available online yet.
FWIW: Trying to reconcile record low VIX numbers (low trading volumes - previously discussed on this board) with polls showing high public anxiety over geopolitical tensions (like N. Korea and natural disasters), Weber suggested that people are pretty much
(1) already holding a lot of cash and
(2) essentially
frozen in place re their investments. In other words, the geopolitical anxieties have folks so much on edge, they've collectively decided to
do nothing.
I've commented before that my own trading among funds is at an unusually low level (in this case a
good thing). One small trade last week - the only change since early May.
Nominal cash (It's actually a bit higher when considering other parts of portfolio) sits around 19.5% It dwindled from the 20+ % I set it at in early May. That's more of a
barometer than any stroke of investment genius here. However, if it continues to fall (as risk markets rise) I'll need to reset it back to 20%.
I'll see if I can at least find a bit of biographical information on Weber. It was an interesting interview.
Biographical re Axel Weber:
http://www.4-traders.com/business-leaders/Axel-Weber-4783/biography/2 related threads (from
@Ted)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/could-some-vix-related-funds-go-poof-in-a-day-1504576860https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/28/business/dealbook/vix-trading.html?_r=0
Comments
Like Jerry I'm about 95% invested, collecting or reinvesting dividends when strategically appropriate and basically taking what Mr. Market gives me.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong only that it's right for me.
Regards,
Ted
5th Fifth Dimension: ,Up Up and Away,:
Guess I used excessive hyperbole trying to summarize Weber's comments. He sounded to me pretty level-headed. Far as I could tell, his firm isn't making any moves or suggesting anyone else do anything different. I think he's correct that, in general, money managers have moved to a higher cash position now than they might have been carrying a few years ago. Hard to document. Am mostly with T. Rowe. Most of their fund reports suggest their managers are exercising an extra dose of caution - lower than normal risk.
I didn't react to Weber either - except to share his thoughts here. You need to understand that some of us have really boring lives and actually find this kind of financial chatter of interest - even if we don't act on it. Come to think - It's kinda nice being retired and being able to enjoy coffee with Bloomberg blabbering in the background rather than being at work.
Agree 100% with sticking to whatever plan you have. And, if one's plan says to pay 0 attention to market valuation, geopolitical factors, age, risk tolerance or anything else - that's fine. Obviously, some do have plans that take into consideration some of those factors.
---
Clarification: Retired for 20 years. Don't maintain a separate cash reserve, emergency fund, cash on the side, or X-years living expenses (as many here do). Everything's invested all the time. Might help explain why a 20% cash position could appear "whacky" to some.