Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Mr. Baron needs to take a good look at his funds' expenses. They are not outrageous, but they are higher than they should be given the company's assets and the low turnover ratio in the funds. 1.30% for $5.3 billion BSCFX, compared to 0.15% for a small cap index fund?
A long time ago I owned a few Baron funds and I was pretty happy at the time. But I saw an article about his appearance on CNBC yesterday and the headline suggested he's a billionaire. Can that really be true? Fair enough, he started his own firm many years ago and I'm sure he's made a good amount of money. But I thought being a billionaire was reserved for a small handful of massively successful people. Is he really in that league?
So he's in the same neighborhood as Bill Gross ($2.3 billion in 2015 from Forbes). I'm not a huge fan of Bill Gross, but he co-founded PIMCO, ran a fund with 10 times as much money in it than Baron has in his entire firm and was widely touted as the best bond investor of his time. @BobC has a very good point about those expense ratios!
Comments
Regards,
Ted
Baron Funds Website:
http://www.baronfunds.com/
to POAGX, based on both performance and expense, I'll stick with POAGX.
[1] Forbes: the World's Billionaires - Ron Baron March 2014