Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • QDSNX - A Fund for Retirees?
    Only problem I see with REMIX/BLNDX, is that 50% of the portfolio is in ultra cheap ETFs to get market “beta” and the other half is in the actual alternative strategy. The expense ration is 1.5% for the cheaper share class. Most of us have the market exposure already so might as well save the 1.5% and get a fund that just concentrates on the strategy your interested in and doesn’t just charge you an exorbitant fee for 50% exposure to what you most likely already own.
  • CD
    I continue to use CDs as long as they keep paying 5% or more. Currently at Schwab, they have a significant number of non-callable CDs. For me in retirement, it is a very comfortable, no risk way, to make the 4 to 6% TR that I seek in retirement. I maintain about a dozen CDs in an 18 month ladder, with a preference for 12 month CDs I also use the Schwab Money Market funds, SNAXX and SWVXX, for those assets I need for liquidity.
  • ⇒ All Things Boeing ... NASA may send Starliner home without its crew
    https://thehill.com/regulation/transportation/4579944-part-falls-off-boeing-plane-during-takeoff-in-denver/
    SWA. Engine cowling fell off during or after takeoff. Safe return to Denver Airport. Are they using Spirit for maintenance, too? WTF!
  • January MFO Ratings Posted
    Just posted all ratings to MFO Premium site through March using Refinitiv's data drop yesterday ... reflecting MTD performance through 5 April.
  • QDSNX - A Fund for Retirees?
    WABAC,
    My plan penalizes rollovers for those under 59 1/2. -- The punishment is 6 months of no contribution (which means I pay more taxes this year) -- which also means 6 months without a 7% company match.
    Thanks. I was jumping the gun. You still need to retire. :)
  • DJT in your portfolio - the first two funds reporting (edited)
    @Baseball_Fan said: ”illegal invaders begging in front of many stores in some of the most exclusive neighborhoods in the country”.
    I’m absolutely astounded at the wealth disparity in this country. By all accounts it is growing. You do not need to be an immigrant (legal or otherwise) to be living in relative squalor. Where’d all that wealth come from? All clever hard working dudes? Some for sure. But much is inherited generationally and not always from the cleanest hands. Work ethics, legalities or good fortune aside, it still stinks to high heavens.
    Access to food and shelter in the US is rampant. Not only is it a shame it's a crime in one of the richest countries in the world. If you think even for a minute that it's all illegal invaders take a trip to your local food shelf and streets of any city. Here's a report on one group.
  • Retirement Savings By Age - What to do with your portfolio (T Rowe Price 2024)
    An easy read. Thanks, @hank. Age 70 is coming for me in July. I can afford some more risk with a longer time-horizon---- given that I have a working spouse, much younger, and have heirs in mind, not just myself. Still, everyone should be prudent about taking either not enough risk, or too much.
    I'll switch-out of some of my junk bonds sooner or later. They are still juicy and advantageous at the moment. But yes, they will require me to stay vigilant about their risks in different circumstances. I've just BEGUN a position in FALN: investment-grade bonds which have fallen into "junk" status. The safer side of the junk bond world.
    My allocations are not far off from those offered in the article. I do not include savings in the credit unions; those accounts are always earmarked for some goal or expense we are saving for. And in just several months, the car will be paid-off: the new car we bought, after arriving here in the Aloha State. We got a good deal on that Nissan sedan, though there have been battery issues.
    7 cash.
    48 US stocks
    5 foreign stocks.
    38 bonds of all sorts, including the balanced funds we own. (Soon switching out of BRUFX and into WBALX to counter-balance some of the risk inherent in the single-stocks we now own. Oil/gas midstream and drilling is doing nicely; but financials and Real Estate? Not good at all, yet.)
    3 "other."
    Still reinvesting everything that comes, except with TS, because it's an ADR. I'm unable to reinvest profit from TS at Schwab. So, I'll reinvest the cash manually, myself. Every year in January, I take just a very thin slice from the T-IRA, which does not affect tax return. I deliberately keep that withdrawal amount limited, so that the portfolio can make up the difference through the coming year. Finally: I have been continuing to ADD monthly to the portfolio in tiny bites, too. I'll re-start that habit shortly with the new broker dealer (Schwab.)
    RMDs are coming in a couple of years. I suppose the "good news" is that I'm already accustomed to taking those RMDs unofficially, already. Maybe not quite as big a chunk as the required RMDs will be...
  • QDSNX - A Fund for Retirees?
    WABAC,
    My plan penalizes rollovers for those under 59 1/2. -- The punishment is 6 months of no contribution (which means I pay more taxes this year) -- which also means 6 months without a 7% company match.
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    "RELIABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, ACCURACY, DEPENDABILITY"
    You've obviously not tried to talk to anyone on the Customer Rage and Aggravation phone line in the past 30 years.

    "Customer Rage and Aggravation" phone line? Is that for real? Never knew such a thing even existed.
    The only thing Schwab has ever upset me about in 27 years was when they redid all the research pages, and TOOK AWAY a lot of personal portfolio data, in the fall of 2022. I complained about it to the regular people on the phone numerous times, but never went on a rage over it.
    The research pages are much clumsier to find actual data on than they used to be. They look like some 5 year-old kid arranged them -- but they have to keep the nerds busy. I often go to Mstar or Yahoo if I can't find what I"m looking for on Schwab's mess.
    "Change, just for the sake of change, is always good." -- any nerd.
    Just in recent months they brought back (finally) the personal portfolio data and charts.
    So I'm still good with the whole organization.
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    @FD1000
    Hand-holding, I don't need much. What has gone missing is RELIABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, ACCURACY, DEPENDABILITY, and Customer Rage And Aggravation agents who can THINK. I also think it's disgraceful that employers won't ALLOW employees to simply have a pad and pencil to take notes, to assist the process when their help is asked for. I've been told that, explicitly.
    The above are serious accusations...based on what? If this is true Schwab would be shut down. Millions have been using Schwab for years, including several posters who stated they never had any issues for years...maybe it's you?
    Notes with a pencil? again, are you serious? notes are entered into the system so the next customer rep can see them.
    Several days ago you doubted Schwab would give you the $50...and they did...but you didn't report it until I asked you.
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    @Crash, you can fight and complain about the tech revolution that started decades ago...or, join it. It's a choice. I know people in their 50s who refuse to join, but I also know people in their 80s who joined it.
    Example: I'm in several groups who play Bridge, 1-2 don't do well with text and why they miss about half of what is going on, no one wants to call or email them, unless we miss a player.
    Schwab is better than Fidelity. I left VG decades ago but I'm sure Schwab is bette. I never had TRP but from reading posts for decades, I would not expect them to be at the top.
    You can't have hand-holding and very cheap/free services. Schwab still have plenty of offices you can visit.
    Try a generic tutorial (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v85mLIx3hJg)
    Try a specific tutorial (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf5N6dqfQaNRooD-MN434gIfzDyI71IsK)
  • Bloomberg Wall Street Week
    The "hot" jobs numbers released by gummint was mentioned by Summers. He's pushing for a rather higher neutral rate. I giggle at the jobs numbers, anymore: most of the hires are part-time. No vacation, no benefits. Because employers can get away with it. Some folks want P/T, ok. And 3.8% unemployment? LOL. How many part-time jobs are in that mix? No one can be a breadwinner working P/T, although many today are forced to try to do it.
    From this weeks Barron's:
    "One other knock on the labor market data has been the strength in part-time employment versus full-time jobs. But there’s nothing wrong with that, if it’s for the right reason, according to RBC Capital Markets economist Michael Reid. The number of part-timers who actually prefer those gigs outnumber those forced to take part-time work for economic reasons by a factor of five, he writes in a client note."
    "With more employers changing work-from-home policies, it isn’t surprising that some workers are preferring more flexible arrangements, he continues. There is also a clear upward trend in the number of over-55 workers opting for part-time gigs instead of full-time, he adds."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/stock-market-will-feel-a-tremor-if-payrolls-and-inflation-keep-rising/ar-BB1l9tDM
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    @hank, this T+1 (vs T+2) rule for stocks/ETFs/CEFs was adopted 2 years ago. Brokers were given 2 years to make changes to their systems and 5/28/24 is that final date. So, who wants to deal with a broker who couldn't fix this in the 2 year window?
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    Seek, and ye shall find. TAKE, and ye shall have. Giggle. My interactions at Schwab so far have not been egregiously awful, just rather typical, including the need to explain a problem 12 ways before they can comprehend what's going on. I even was accused once of "venting." (Maybe next time, stop to THINK first, Missy!) But not always. I DID indeed get the $50 extortion fee refunded, without even asking. The agent initiated it on her own, after I mentioned the strange -$50 debit amount showing. Officially getting access to my wife's as yet unfunded IRA was a monstrous fiasco. Contradictory misinformation abounded. Finally got it done. And we won't have to deal with the passive-aggressive twit on the phone anymore, at BRUFX. The required transfer form is supposed to be in the mail to us. The Schwab AMEX cards arrived yesterday. I had to call AMEX and waste a bunch of time simply trying to find our credit limit. It was also expertly camouflaged amid 14 pages of no doubt legally required STUFF that came with the cards. I remember receiving new credit cards in the past, with the credit limit printed right above the cards--- which are glued to the page.
    I'm learning where Schwab has hidden everything. Progress is being made. The most anti-intuitive website I've run into. Accomplished my first trade. Limit order, will go through after the week-end, I expect. I'll survive--- even the inattention of the fellow downtown. There is no advantage anymore in doing things face-to-face. That's been true, I guess, for decades. A bitter pill. Still stuck in my throat. Probably stay stuck there forever. The younger generation, including the ones sitting at the desks at "Customer Rage and Aggravation," don't even expect real service anymore. ("What's the problem? Why should you be annoyed at needing to fix OUR mistake?")
    I am a relic who still asserts that systems ought to serve people, rather than themselves.
  • Bloomberg Wall Street Week
    If you like hearing Ray Dalio you’ll enjoy the first segment (April 5). Never at a loss for words. Includes a clip of Dalio being interviewed on the original WSW in the 80s about the Mexican Peso crisis. Also features some clips of Congressional testimony he gave around then. And, of course, the interview with Bloomberg’s David Westin.
    A good portion of the later part is spent with Larry Summers. Better than average and longer than average discussion. Larry took exception to some of Powell’s recent rhetoric / interest rate comments. As usual, Summers sees the Fed as far “behind the curve” in moving rates up to a meaningful / appropriate level. (Of course, should the economy tank, it won’t be Summers taking the blame.) If there was much investment-specific advise on this show I missed it. But Dalio did talk about the learning curve and how early mistakes can prove rewarding longer term if you learn a lasting lesson. Dalio also emphasized taking diversified approaches as an investor.
    Addition - Sonal Desai, CEO of Fixed Income Investing at Franklin Funds, also was interviewed on the show for a few minutes. I find Desai engaging and bright … but a recent check of her prior Barron’s Roundtable record in predicting winners was a bit disheartening. Nonetheless, like Summers, Desai also finds the Fed’s fund rate too low and doesn’t agree with Powell on that matter.
  • DJT in your portfolio - the first two funds reporting (edited)
    From The Guardian "Trump Media deal faces calls for inquiry over alleged ‘influence peddling’"
    ARTICLE
  • Schwab move...Let's retire this thread. Lots of interactions. Food for thought. THNX.
    @Crash, I'm sorry for your difficulties, but I have to say that you seem to be the unluckiest person alive with all the difficulties you've had. I originally was with Thinkorswim; then to TDA; finally on to Schwab. All the transitions were smooth and all agreements were honored post-transition. Have had nothing but positive interactions with representatives all along the way. Anecdotal, of course, but your problems seem atypical to me as well.
    The following are several brokers that I have used: VG, Fidelity, Schwab, Scott, Welltrade,Thinkorswim. I have moved money several times from one to the other (Fidelity <--> Scwhab)..I had zero problems with all the above.
    I think it's more than being unlucky.
    Hey crash, did you get the $50 transfer/extortion fee charged to you by TRP.
  • QDSNX - A Fund for Retirees?
    @fred495, to add to the conversation and add to your post, which I think is a good one, I'm wondering if others, especially those near or in retirement, own or are looking at alternative type 'absolute return' funds in their portfolio. I actually like the idea of some percentage of these to smooth out the ride. Problem (maybe) is that there are so many in the alternative section to choose and they can be vastly different.
    So, I'll give the ones I'm using. If others want to chime in that would be great.
    I hold:
    JHQAX, at about 10%, an options fund recently discussed in this month's commentary by @Devo
    BLNDX/REMIX at about 5%, a multi asset fund, labeled as a L/S by M* (I don't agree)
    LCR, which can be closer to a balanced fund, at about 5%
    By the way, to give an opinion on your starting post, I do thing QDSNX would be as good a choice as others available to accomplish the "smoother" portfolio ride.

    @MikeM - those are great ideas for the "smoother ride" approach. I have a few more suggestions:
    -PSFF - FOF for options - prefer it to JHQAX, but really the same space.
    -RSIVX Lower SD than LCR, but also lower Returns. Very conservative.
  • The week that was, global etf's, various categories + heat map. Week ending May 17, 2024.
    The graphic is set for the 5 days ending April 5, Friday; for the best to worst % returns in select etf categories. One may then also select the one month column to align the one month return best to worst; or for the other listed time frame columns.
    ADD an etf performance of your choosing, if you desire. ***
    *** Requested ADD: For the week and YTD
    --- EWW = +1.46% / +3.64% (I Shares, Mexico)
    MMKT note: Fidelity mmkt's yields were down slightly this week, with core acct's yields at 4.95% (SPAXX) and 4.98% (FDRXX).
    NOTE: The broad U.S. equity and bond sectors finished the week with losses in the 1% range. With the longer duration bonds finding the largest losses towards the - 3% area.
    !!!!! Money market funds holdings set a new record amount of $6.11 trillion this week.
    NEW: 1 week 'heat map' by sectors. This is an interactive graphic. You may hover the computer pointer over the various blocks to view portions of sectors and/or stocks within those sectors. NOTE: to the left of the graphic, one may change the 1 week performance drop down menu to another time frame. Another example: at the left edge of the graphic, select exchange traded funds and then 1 week or a time period of your choice.
    Remain curious,
    Catch
  • the April newsletter is live
    @Ben, let's just go through it together
    Here's the relevant para:
    A Twist in Strike/Price
    An investor is long a stock at whatever price they buy the stock. (i've fixed the "a" in here)
    Not so with Options. Each Option comes with a Strike Price. At the Option expiry, one compares the Strike price of the Option vis-à-vis the then Stock price to determine if the Option expires in-the-money or out-of-the-money.
    Here's the intent of the writing:
    Stocks and Options behave differently. While a stock investor buys a stock and that buying price becomes their Basis, that is not the same with Options.
    If I buy a Call Option on Apple, here's how the Basis works.
    Suppose Apple stock is at 169 right now per share
    Suppose I buy a call Option on Apple at 175 that expires next month.
    Next week Apple announces a great product and the stock goes to 190 per share.
    When my Call Option expires, I "exercise" my Call Option at 175.
    That means my stock Basis is 175. It is not 169 (when I bought the call option), nor is it 190 (where Apple stock is on Option expiry date).
    It's 175 because that the Call Strike of my option.
    What is Apple was to go to 150 next week and stay there until my Expiry Date instead of 190?
    Well, then I would not Exercise my call option on Apple. I would lose my Call Premium and walk away. I would have never bought Apple. Not at 169, not at 175, and not even at 150.
    Thus Stock Purchases and Option Purchases have a different paths.
    With Option purchases, the ending Stock Price and the chosen Strike Price matter.
    Jargon:
    Is this a lot of jargon. It might be. Only each one of us can be honest with ourselves about what's too much jargon and terminology. In general, if I don't understand the jargon involved, I simply do not participate in the product offering. I don't have to know everything to make money. Just one or two things really well.