It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I would get a couple free lunches per month. If I was worried that much about it I would eat lunch at home instead of going out every day. :)I keep roughly 1% of assets in cash from two accounts at Schwab. Even if they paid me 5% it wouldn't change my life any.
Won't change my life either but 1% in say, a million dollar account(s), would be about $500 bucks more in my pocket each year. I play the Schwab game of moving between MM and the sweep account as they made the rules, typically limiting the sweep to a couple of bucks. If a trade kicks in you have a day or two to make the switch back.
Won't change my life either but 1% in say, a million dollar account(s), would be about $500 bucks more in my pocket each year. I play the Schwab game of moving between MM and the sweep account as they made the rules, typically limiting the sweep to a couple of bucks. If a trade kicks in you have a day or two to make the switch back.I keep roughly 1% of assets in cash from two accounts at Schwab. Even if they paid me 5% it wouldn't change my life any.
Thank you yugo, opening 'individual' accounts is exactly what we are doing and then moving some of the 'joint' account shares 'in-kind' to the individual A/Cs. Thanks for your comment.Coverage is $500K per 'separate capacity' - defined, loosely, by account ownership and type: https://www.sipc.org/for-investors/investors-with-multiple-accounts
Since it sounds like everything is currently in a "joint" account, you could open an 'individual' account at the same firm and move some of the assets there.
Alternatively, you can move assets to another firm "in-kind", which would not be a taxable event.

I do not think so. Our neighbor's sewer line broke and fortunately they had insurance through a company called American Water Resources. They were quite difficult to deal with, but in the end they sent someone out to dig up the street and make the necessary repairs.This thread is getting flushed down the sewer pretty fast but Old_Joe's home maintenance tip with "thin stuff" is useful. My neighbor spent $5K on sewer line repair because evidently tree roots went into his sewer line just before the sewer line connects to the city's and he had to get it fixed. I did not want to ask the neighbor but I am presuming home insurance covers, subject to deductible, episodes like this. No?
https://etfdb.com/index-education/mlp-investing/40 Act Funds – RIC Compliant – Less than 25% MLPs
Funds that own less than 25% MLPs do not pay taxes at the fund level, enabling them to pass through the entire return to their investors. The return of capital benefit from owning MLPs is muted due to the limit imposed on MLP ownership. Investors interested in RIC-compliant energy infrastructure funds should research what the fund owns for the other 75%. Common positions include midstream C-Corporations, utility companies, exploration and production companies, refiners, and MLP affiliates structured as C-Corporations.
Advantages:Disadvantages:
- Ownership of the underlying securities
- Little to no tracking error
- Generally lower yield
Definitely not. First of all, I'm not sure this axiom is even valid. Secondly, algorithms are often based around market axioms. This has to be a situational decision. We've had all manner of bad news, and, despite everything, we've held up. We're coming off a downturn. I think there's at least a slight upward bias at this point. I think you can safely be a little bit bullish here. Not crazy, though.@racqueteer : "playing the odds" Sell in May & go away ?
@Crash - You’re more patient than me. I fiddle for 5 or 10 minutes and than cancel the order. Don’t like uncertainty. One reason I’ve moved mostly to open end traditional funds is to get away from this minute by minute game.Difficult to stay patient sitting on an unfilled Limit Buy Order when Mr. Market is rising and rising..... But it cannot go on forever upward in a straight line. Behavioral Economics. Beware of FOMO.
Consider yourself lucky. The K-1 filing deadline is March 15th, but companies can request an automatically granted extension to Sept 15th. (Sept 16th this year; Sept 15th is a Sunday.)I bit the bullet and bought into an MLP NOT in my IRA. I don't like waiting for the k-1, but the stock is worth the "hassle." The company lets you sign-in to access the k-1 before it comes in the mail. THIS year, the k-1 came atrociously late via the USPS.
https://www.etftrends.com/energy-infrastructure-channel/beyond-the-k-1-tax-treatment-for-an-mlp-fund-vs-an-mlp/If any fund (mutual fund, closed-end fund, or ETF) owns more than 25% MLPs, the fund will be taxed as a corporation. Accordingly, there are two types of MLP funds – those structured as RICs, which own up to 25% MLPs, and those structured as corporations (or C-Corp funds), which tend to be 90-100% MLPs.
ETFtrends (cited above).One disadvantage of investing in a C-Corp fund instead of individual MLPs is the potential for tax drag to weigh on fund performance relative to its underlying holdings. C-Corp funds accrue a deferred tax liability for the portion of distributions considered to be a tax-deferred return of capital and for gains in underlying holdings.
Apart from a Fidelity MMF (which can't be THAT expensive!) I don't see any funds in their Portfolio holdings. Just straight equities from what I can tell.Invesco website says 5.44% comes from underlying funds - holdings look a mix of funds and individual MLPs. Why would there be funds within anything called "Select".
https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/mutual-funds/product-detail?audienceType=Investor&fundId=32052
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla