Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Is It Time to Throttle Back Equities?
    I have no issue with people who have all manner of strategies. I'm a believer in "do what works for you."
    Personally, I've turned into much more of a "buy and hold" investor in the last few years from the standpoint of it's just not very enjoyable to me to have to frequently rebalance and tweak.
    There may be some variation in the desired holding periods for me, ranging from multi-decade (railroads fall within this, as well as some other things including Archer Daniels, International Flavors and Fragrances and Jardine Matheson), to 5-10 year (Ecolab, Visa, WP Carey as examples) and a lot that I have a 3-5 view on.
    Things change, absolutely, but I think the Buffett quote of "Buy what you would feel comfortable with if the market closed for 10 years" is a good filter in the decision making process.
  • WHAT COLUMBUS MISSED: Royce Rediscovers India:
    MINDX has performed well over this year, but as @JohnChisum mentioned India funds have had a history of providing a roller coaster of a ride. This past year, MINDX has exhibited very little volatility as well as consistent upward momentum. As @Junkster has mentioned of his investment choices, MINDX has exhibited a movement over the past year that I believe he would call "strong upward momentum with very little volatility".
    I like to use MAPIX as my "safe harbor" (diversified fund for Asia exposure) so I chart MINDX against MAPIX to determine MINDX relative volatility. Over the last year MAPIX has moved sideways while MINDX provided a 60% gain.
    image
    I am watching shorter charts of 1 & 3 months for higher volatility signals again using MAPIX as my indicator. The most recent 1 month chart indicates pretty similar movement compared to MAPIX.
    image
  • In Defense Of Advisors Who Sell Variable Annuities
    Fortunately a very tongue-in-cheek essay. Quite clever, actually.
    We have had a number of clients who come to us with existing variable annuity contracts. If they are lucky, they have held them long enough to be free of deferred sales charges. Some have come in with 10-year surrender/deferred charges, some owned by folks who are in their 70s and 80s (yeah, real ethical salespersons). If there is no net gain, the contracts can be surrendered. If there is a gain of any size, at least they can be 1035-exchanged to a no-load product (like Jefferson National, Vanguard, or Schwab). Sadly, most are sold by bank salespersons, who know almost nothing about the products they sell, except that they are told to push them. The annual expenses can really be awful, not to mention the salespersons almost never disclose that owners can only access 10% of the principal in the first year. All who have been sold these products think otherwise.
    There may be honest, ethical variable annuity salespersons out there somewhere.
  • The Various Flavors of Long Short Equity Funds.
    GENIX has been open less than 2 years (since May 31, 2013). Classic pattern for many of these boutique funds with high fees. Tailor a hot combination of investments (in this case 99.5% equities) and ride the wave. Watch the money pour in (already over 1.5 BL). Pump that new money into the currently hot sectors. A year (or two or three) later, the market climate changes and the fund starts to swoon. The money pours out as fast as it came in and everybody is convinced the fund's losses are attributable to "bloat" (missing the larger issue).
    As usual, those who were last in and last to leave suffer the losses.
    Seen this over and over with these funds.
  • The Various Flavors of Long Short Equity Funds.
    Most have struggled this year, as the article mentions...one of my favorites WBMIX is off 3.5% YTD. Honestly, hard to beat the pure index in this market.
    I don't think the article mentioned a different kind of long/short strategy that is doing well lately...Gotham Absolute Return Fund (GARIX)...up 9% YTD, or Gotham Enhanced Return Fund (GENIX)...up 16.7% YTD. I'm actually reluctant to call attention to Gotham's Funds, despite my admiration for Mr. Greenblatt...hard for me to get past the 2.25% er. But, in this case, so far anyway, must give these funds credit.
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    Note:
    For some reason, Ted's link to his original article disappeared or became inoperative after I wrote a response. Not good. Here's the original article to which I was responding:
    http://www.nasdaq.com/article/target-date-funds-twice-as-popular-vs-15-years-ago-cm425440
    The comparison is with 1998. That was an extraordinarily "euphoric" period for retail investors for many reasons. So, the rise in popularity of balanced funds in subsequent years doesn't surprise me.
    If I'm reading this article correctly, it's really about balanced funds "which include target-date funds" (quoting from article). I find this presentation a bit suspicious.
    That aside, it's unfortunate so called "target date" funds get lumped together at all by financial commentators like this one. They vary greatly in their approach to investing. If you want a good one, look to the fund family first. That's where it all starts with these things.
  • BlackRock Continues To Make The Most Of The ETF Growth Story
    FYI: The exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry saw one of its largest monthly gains in November, with data compiled by ETF.com showing that U.S.-listed ETFs witnessed $42 billion in net inflows for the month. [1] The strong performance for the extremely popular investment channel helped asset managers rake in more than $192 billion in net new money across their ETF offerings for the eleven-month period this year – comfortably surpassing the $188 billion record figure for full-year 2013. U.S.-listed ETFs are just shy of $2 trillion in total assets – a threshold they are very likely to cross by the end of the year thanks to the record run for the equity market over recent weeks.
    ,BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) gained the most over the year, with the financial institution capitalizing on its position as the world’s largest asset manager as well as world’s largest ETF provider to report net inflows of $71.4 billion in the U.S. and almost $90 billion worldwide. [2] Vanguard, which saw an exceptionally strong start to the year (see Vanguard Trumps BlackRock, State Street To Record Highest ETF Inflows In Q1), comes in a close second with $63.5 billion in U.S. inflows and $75 billion in global inflows. This has brought Vanguard within striking distance of State Street (NYSE:STT) for the position of the second largest U.S.-listed ETF provider.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.trefis.com/stock/blk/articles/271067/blackrock-continues-to-make-the-most-of-the-etf-growth-story/2014-12-19
  • Inflation and the value of the $
    @Tampabay
    How is a U.S. president (regardless of party affiliation) directly responsible for a large increase in inflation? Albeit, the two most recent (and ongoing) wars have caused vast sums of debt.
    Cost of Iraq/Afgan Wars, one source, March, 2013
    Thanks.
    Catch
  • Barry Ritholtz: No Room For Feelings In The Market
    Problem: 24/7 financial news cycle, Solution: you must learn to filter garbage, take ONLY what YOU can use (to make money), file the rest into useless, then make your OWN decisions
    Predictions: are for entertainment purposes only, have fun with them, do your own:
    I predict we will make good money in 2014,esp. after 2013, and we will make money again in 2015, write that one down for your first 2015
  • Barry Ritholtz: No Room For Feelings In The Market
    LATEST MEMO FROM OUR CHAIRMAN, HOWARD MARKS
    Memo to: Oaktree Clients
    From: Howard Marks
    Re: The Lessons of Oil December 20,2014 © 2007-2014 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. All Rights Reserved.(excerpts)
    "Over the last year or so, while continuing to feel that U.S. economic growth will be slow and unsteady in the next year or two,
    I came to the conclusion that any surprises
    we're most likely to be to the upside. And my best candidate for a favorable development has been the possibility that the U.S. would sharply increase its production of oil and gas. This would make the U.S. oil-independent, making it a net exporter of oil and giving it a cost advantage in energy–based oncheap production from fracking and shale–
    and thus a cost advantage in manufacturing. Now the availability of cheap oil all around the world threatens those advantages. So much for macro
    forecasting!

    There’s a great deal to be said about the price change itself.
    A well-known quote from economist
    Rudiger Dornbusch goes as follows:
    “In economics things take longer to happen than you
    think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.”
    I don’t know if
    many people were thinking about whether the price of oil would change, but the decline of 40%-plus must have happened much faster than anyone thought possible.
    On the other hand
    –and in investing there’s always another hand–high levels of confidence,
    complacency and composure on the part of investors have in good measure given way to disarray and doubt, making many markets much more to our liking
    .
    For the last few years, interest rates on the safest securities–
    brought low by central banks
    –have been coercing investors to move out the risk
    curve. Sometimes they’ve made that journey without cognizance of the risks they were taking, and without thoroughly understanding the investments they undertook. Now they
    find themselves questioning
    many of their actions, and it feels like risk tolerance is being replaced by risk aversion.
    This paragraph describes a process through which investors are made to feel pain, but also one that makes markets much safer and potentially more bargain-laden.
    http://www.oaktreecapital.com/MemoTree/The Lessons of Oil.pdf
    Elsewhere; A look at the commodity bubble in the 2000-08 period.Just an observance of the past for me personally.I have no opinion on his bullish outlook for oil. Article from Seeking Alpha.
    Lawrence Fuller, Fuller Asset Management Dec. 20, 2014 2:55 PM ET
    The Oil Price Plunge - Fiction, Reality And Opportunity (excerpts)
    "Shortly after the tech bubble burst in 2000, institutions began to allocate billions of dollars into commodities through the futures markets in an effort to capitalize on growth in the developing world. Commodities became a new financial asset class. The continual and escalating flow of funds into a buy-and-hold strategy of a basket of commodities with no sensitivity to price led to a parabolic move upwards in prices prior to the financial crisis in 2008.
    The regulatory body for the futures exchanges (CFTC) exacerbated the volatility by exempting Wall Street banks from the limits under which traditional speculators operate. As a result, a hedge fund can use a Wall Street bank as a counter-party to speculate on commodity prices for financial gain with no limitations. It is important to recognize that the vast majority of oil futures contract holders never take delivery of a single barrel of oil-they simply roll over the contracts. As a result of these changes in market structure, futures prices now dictate spot prices.
    There was no greater evidence of commodity prices divorcing from fundamentals than the surge in oil to $147/barrel during the summer of 2008. That parabolic move occurred six months into what we now call the Great Recession. There were no lines at the gas pump. There was no outcry from oil-importing nations that they were unable to obtain the oil that they needed. That move was fueled by speculative investment flows into oil futures contracts in a herd mentality. The herd was being steered (over a cliff) in part by deluded research reports from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs that were forecasting prices of $150 and $200/barrel, respectfully. Just a few months later the price had collapsed to less than $60/barrel, but not because of a commensurate decline in demand or increase in supply. Institutional investors and speculators were being forced to deleverage and unwind long positions in the throes of the financial crisis and stock market meltdown"
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/2770205-the-oil-price-plunge-fiction-reality-and-opportunity?ifp=0
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    FYI: Many workers want to put their retirement accounts on autopilot.
    That's the lesson from new data that show that recently hired plan members flock to balanced funds — which include target-date funds
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTg3NzE2ODQ=
    Enlarged Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=webMFbalanc122214.png&docId=731592&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=562&caption=&id=731583
  • 5 Great Tech Funds Without Loads
    FYI: Add spice to your portfolio with these top-performing no-load mutual funds that focus on technology stocks.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.kiplinger.com/printstory.php?pid=13111
  • WHAT COLUMBUS MISSED: Royce Rediscovers India:
    FYI: In 1492, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus set sail to
    discover India. He missed his mark, however, landing in
    America instead. The rest, as they say, is history—with the
    exception that more than 500 years later India is still worthy of
    discovery for many Western investors.
    India is the world’s largest democracy and Asia’s third-largest
    economy. With its rapidly growing middle class, India is also the
    world’s third-largest economy measured by purchasing power
    parity, and with a median age of just 25 years old, it will also
    soon have a fi fth of the world’s working-age population.1 India’s
    median age is 10 years younger than the U.S.’s and nine years
    younger than China’s.2 This demographic dividend sets the
    stage for growth.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.roycefunds.com/insights/2014/02/pdf/INDIA-0213.pdf
  • The Closing Bell: U.S. Stocks End With Biggest Weekly Gain Since October 2014
    Ha! I had one of those rare good days when all stock ticker symbols in the portfolio were green, even though S&P 500 was off a little. Wonderful week.
  • International Quantitative Value (IVAL) Launched Today
    The international sister to Quantitative Value (QVAL), which we profiled in the December commentary.
    Here's letter announcement from Dr. Gray:
    Friends/Family/Fans:
    ValueShares has launched its second Active EtF, the ValueShares International Quantitative Value EtF (Ticker: IVAL).
    The IVAL mission is straightforward:
    We seek to buy the cheapest, highest quality International value stocks.
    We believe that because you understand value investing, and the inevitability of human bias, a systematic approach to value investing offered through IVAL might be interesting.
    Financial markets offer a wide array of products today, and you are free to choose among them, but if you are a value investor, IVAL can provide you with a simple way to practice Ben Graham’s common sense value investing style.
    We have a White Paper entitled, “Our Quantitative Value Philosophy,” which outlines the philosophy underpinning our IVAL strategy.
    Many investors are seeking actively managed investments, which focus on high-conviction portfolios (e.g., less than 50 stocks), and do not seek to replicate the performance of an index. Unfortunately, there are very few actively managed, high-conviction, value-focused international equity EtFs available today. We hope IVAL can meet the needs of investors who are seeking an actively managed, high-conviction, value-focused, international equity EtF.
    You can learn more about IVAL at ValueShares.com and you can learn more about Alpha Architect (the advisor) at AlphaArchitect.com.
    Semper Fidelis,
    Wesley R. Gray, Ph.D.
  • Is there a good reason to be other than U.S. centric for equity investments, at this time?
    I think the reality is that stocks of the developed world should do well. The Japanese are pumping something like 3 trillion yen (about $25 billion) in stocks and roughly $750 million in Japanese REIT's on an annual basis. At the end of October the Japanese Pension Fund also increased its allocations to both Japanese and international stocks from 12% to 25% (that's 25% each not combined) which I think is about $137 billion for each.
    The Europeans are in desperate need and will likely make their own QE more aggressive sometime in Q1 2015. I believe this will drive their stock markets higher and will help the US too as some of that money gets invested in the US.
    Of course the Nikkei has already seen a good increase since these measures were announced, but if you think about how far the S&P has come since QE started in the US then there should be a lot further to go. Even if you consider the economy of Japan, and maybe even Europe is better than the US was in early 2009, and certainly sentiment is better, I think there's still a long way to go for these markets.
    The key is, and I think this the most important part, if you want to invest in Europe and/or Japan, I would want to be hedged against the currency. I have a few mutual funds that are typically not hedged and I'm keeping them but not using them to invest more. To the extent I'm investing more in Europe or Japan I'm using hedged ETFs or the futures market where I can hedge the currency myself.
    I also like emerging markets because I think, like Europe, the valuations are more reasonable than the US or Japan right now and I think not many are talking about those markets, partly because they fear they will suffer when/if interest rates start increasing in the US and I tend to believe the Europeans and Japanese will most likely fill in any gaps left by US investors.
    So, overall, I think the returns in Europe and Japan will be even better than the US but only if you hedge, but you are quite right that you get a decent amount of foreign exposure just buying the big US companies. Let's just hope they're good at hedging their currency exposure too.
  • Is there a good reason to be other than U.S. centric for equity investments, at this time?
    Morning Coffee Question.
    This question is outside of what percentage one may have in bond holdings of various colors; but related to the equity side.
    Okay, be diversified, etc. This prospect depends upon the investor.
    A good guess may indicate that if one holds U.S. centric funds of whatever flavor, that perhaps 10% of the holdings may be outside of the U.S.; the exception may be in the small cap area. A further presumption will be that especially with the large/mid cap holdings, may have a fair share of earnings from outside of the U.S. With this, one may presume some international equity exposure; whether desired or not.
    Just wondering what you may favor and the thought process for your choice; regarding leaning more towards the U.S. equity side or not.
    Our house has about 5% of the equity portfolio positioned directly at non-U.S. equity ( GPROX ), with the remainder currently overweighed towards the large and mid cap U.S. equity area.
    Well, a somewhat loaded question, with an answer being in the comfort zone of each investor.
    Thank you and take care,
    Catch
  • Anybody Buy the Recent Dip in the S&P 500 Index?
    One of those years where it's been very hard to beat the S&P 500 index.