Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • How to Pay Next-to-Nothing in Taxes During Retirement
    @stillers,
    Please indulges us with your "pay no tax" strategies.
    With your RMDs being 16 years away and retirement starting in 2012 or at age 45, I am all ears.
    Congratulations.
    Thanks!
    Let me correct your dates. Sorry if my post was confusing on that!:
    Retired in 2012 at Age 56
    RMDs will start in 2029 at Age 73 (unless gov't pushes back further)
    Paid ZERO FIT 2013-2024 (12 years)
    Plan to (and very likely will) pay ZERO FIT/SIT 2025-2028 (4 years)
    Total ZERO FIT/SIT period (16 years)
    Strategy was pretty simple (but takes a while to explain!):
    Starting with first professional employments in 1980, got as much $ as humanly possible into tax-deferred accounts. We were DINKS, Double Income, No Kids.
    ONLY worked for companies that had defined benefit pension plans as a bene. Collectively had four professional jobs and four defined benefit pension plans between the two of us between 1980-2012. Annually maxed out 401k's and 403b's and all other investable monies went to Roth IRAs.
    Rolled all possible Pension monies to IRAs upon termination of service to control when we receive income. Final employers provided lovely parting gifts of Retiree Health Insurance, Retiree Dental Insurance and a RHSA (Retiree Health Savings Account). Retired with just enough $ outside the umbrella (in taxable a/c's) to bridge income gap in years until early SS began for both at Age 62 in 2018.
    Started taking (effectively) tax-free IRA w/d's in 2013 to fully defray annual income gaps and/or maximize tax savings. Currently, SS and remaining pensions (that could not be rolled) cover all but a couple grand of annual living expenses.
    98% of liquid net worth is still in IRAs and only 2% is in taxable accounts. We have generated negligible taxable income other than early SS starting in 2018 and remaining Pensions that weren't rolled starting in 2013. We have ALWAYS since 2013 kept total taxable income UNDER the taxable MFJ threshold.
    And to answer question by @derf:
    No formal employment since both retired in 2012. We do however have some friends and relatives throw at us a little cash, dinners, event tix and the like for our otherwise gratuitous mgmt of their ports. I have also done some yard work for some neighbors to keep busy and active for a ridiculously smallish hourly fee. Currently down to just one neighbor as I've tired somewhat of all that.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    ”hank, are you willing to provide more personal details about your situation, so your opinions have some context?”
    Which opinion? I’ll try to compare my situation to yours but not sure if that affects most of my opinions about investing or finance..
    - “When I retired 13 years ago,”
    I retired 25 years ago
    - ”I attempted to project my future spending needs”
    Ditto. I worked this out over the 2 or 3 years before retiring.
    - “Over these years I have meet my spending needs with a combination of pension income (with a COLA), an Annuity Income (Savings that I converted to an Annuity), and some part time work.
    Pretty close. I have Social Security and a pension. While working I opted-in to a pension feature that adds 3% yearly of initial amount. Not really COLA - but helpful. The pension provides some supplemental health care coverage in combination with Medicare. I’m not as up-to-speed as I should be on the out-of-pocket expenses - but there are some. Never owned an annuity. No part time work. Active maintaining home infrastructure others might farm out.
    - ”Since retirement, I have continue to contribute to my HSA and my IRA with contributions from part time work income. Recently I began managing one of my properties as a seasonal rental for additional income. I will work part time spending some of that work income and saving some into an IRA until age 73. My RMDs will then become a forced taxable event that may turn into an income source if needed or taxable savings if not needed."
    Had a 403-B at work invested 100% in a global equities for 28 years. On retirement I converted it to a Traditional IRA and diversified the assets more broadly. In early ‘09 I converted about 40% to a Roth to take advantage of the crash. Made 2 smaller conversions over the next decade. 90% now in a Roth. RMDs alone from the Traditional are adequate to meet all my needs (along with SS & pension). The Roth provides a safety-net that might be needed for major infrastructure repair or other unexpected needs. I’m single and once-divorced. Own some nearby real estate that could be sold for additional cash. The home has a small fixed rate 3.13% mortgage (less than 20% of value) taken out for some renovation more than 5 years ago. Could pay it off, but think I can do better investing across a diversified portfolio consisting largely of OEFs, CEFs & ETFs.
    Thanks for your information Hank! Your comparisons are actually to those of "bee", which I quoted in my post to you above, but that is fine since this thread actually should link back to the OPs.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    ”hank, are you willing to provide more personal details about your situation, so your opinions have some context?”
    Which opinion? I’ll try to compare my situation to yours but not sure if that affects most of my opinions about investing or finance..
    - “When I retired 13 years ago,”
    I retired 25 years ago
    - ”I attempted to project my future spending needs”
    Ditto. I worked this out over the 2 or 3 years before retiring.
    - “Over these years I have meet my spending needs with a combination of pension income (with a COLA), an Annuity Income (Savings that I converted to an Annuity), and some part time work.
    Pretty close. I have Social Security and a pension. While working I opted-in to a pension feature that adds 3% yearly of initial amount. Not really COLA - but helpful. The pension provides some supplemental health care coverage in combination with Medicare. I’m not as up-to-speed as I should be on the out-of-pocket expenses - but there are some. Never owned an annuity. No part time work. Active maintaining home infrastructure others might farm out.
    - ”Since retirement, I have continue to contribute to my HSA and my IRA with contributions from part time work income. Recently I began managing one of my properties as a seasonal rental for additional income. I will work part time spending some of that work income and saving some into an IRA until age 73. My RMDs will then become a forced taxable event that may turn into an income source if needed or taxable savings if not needed."
    Had a 403-B at work invested 100% in a global equities for 28 years. On retirement I converted it to a Traditional IRA and diversified the assets more broadly. In early ‘09 I converted about 40% to a Roth to take advantage of the crash. Made 2 smaller conversions over the next decade. 90% now in a Roth. RMDs alone from the Traditional are adequate to meet all my needs (along with SS & pension). The Roth provides a safety-net that might be needed for major infrastructure repair or other unexpected needs. I’m single and once-divorced. Own some nearby real estate that could be sold for additional cash. The home has a small fixed rate 3.13% mortgage (less than 20% of value) taken out for some renovation more than 5 years ago. Could pay it off, but think I can do better investing across a diversified portfolio consisting largely of OEFs, CEFs & ETFs.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    @dtconroe, do you have Medicare or Medicare Advantage? Once you start Medicare, you cannot contribute to hsa, But you can continue to draw from hsa.

    My question was misdirected to @dtconroe. It should have been to @bee.
    Yes. Began paying medicare part b premium as well as medicare advantage premium. Both are qualified HSA expenses for reimbursement along with all of the following:
    HSA Eligible List
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    @dtconroe, do you have Medicare or Medicare Advantage? Once you start Medicare, you cannot contribute to hsa, But you can continue to draw from hsa.
    My question was misdirected to @dtconroe. It should have been to @bee.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    hank, are you willing to provide more personal details about your situation, so your opinions have some context? bee did provide personal details of retirement and consideration of an "annuity-like" income stream:
    "When I retired 13 years ago, I attempted to project my future spending needs. Over these years I have meet my spending needs with a combination of pension income (with a COLA), an Annuity Income (Savings that I converted to an Annuity), and some part time work. Since retirement, I have continue to contribute to my HSA and my IRA with contributions from part time work income. Recently I began managing one of my properties as a seasonal rental for additional income. I will work part time spending some of that work income and saving some into an IRA until age 73. My RMDs will then become a forced taxable event that may turn into an income source if needed or taxable savings if not needed."
    I never know if posters are in similar situation as the OP, or if they are in a very different situation, when they offer their input to the OP.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    @dtconroe, do you have Medicare or Medicare Advantage? Once you start Medicare, you cannot contribute to hsa, But you can continue to draw from hsa.
    I have a Medicare Advantage plan and an HSA. Fortunately, I have been very healthy throughout my retirement. Same is true for my wife!
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    @dtconroe, do you have Medicare or Medicare Advantage? Once you start Medicare, you cannot contribute to hsa, But you can continue to draw from hsa.
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    bee: "Question: How many have turned to annuities or "annuity - like" strategies to increase your income spending?
    When I retired 13 years ago, I attempted to project my future spending needs. Over these years I have meet my spending needs with a combination of pension income (with a COLA), an Annuity Income (Savings that I converted to an Annuity), and some part time work. Since retirement, I have continue to contribute to my HSA and my IRA with contributions from part time work income. Recently I began managing one of my properties as a seasonal rental for additional income. I will work part time spending some of that work income and saving some into an IRA until age 73. My RMDs will then become a forced taxable event that may turn into an income source if needed or taxable savings if not needed.
    What type of a portfolio would you design as an "Annuity - like" strategy for yourself? Maybe a combinations of Balanced mutual funds/EFTs that distribute periodically? Am I deribing the 4% rule?
    Shifting from a mindset of saving for retirement to a mindset of confidently spending in retirement is a huge challenge we all face."
    For me, I accumulated a significant amount "defined contribution" assets through my employer, along with some estate inheritance assets inherited by my wife. Those all reside in our property, in our Schwab Brokerage, and in local banks and credit unions. As part of our retirement, my wife and I depend on income from Social Security, a small government pension, which pays enough income for about half of our normal living expenses. We produce additional income through a changing array of asset holdings at our brokerage and our bank and credit unions. The closest thing to an "Annuity-like" strategy, that we use are fixed income instruments such as Money Market accounts, CDs, high yield Savings Accounts, and treasuries, to supplement SS and the small pension of my wife. The fixed income instruments are comfortably producing a 4 to 6% stream of income, so I am able to maintain principal and just live off the income that my "principal assets" throw off annually. I have in previous years used bond oefs, that were very low volatility, low "risk" funds, such as RPHIX and DHEAX, but when the Market went through a severe correction in 2020, I sold all the bond oef funds, put all the sales proceeds into MMs, and then moved money out of MMs into other low risk fixed income instruments, many of which are covered by FDIC and NCUA government insurance protection. That is where I am now, but I always have to maintain enough investing flexibility to make investment decisions necessary to throw off enough income, with the least amount of risk, to meet my 4 to 6% annual earnings.
  • Barron’s Funds Quarterly+ (2024/Q4–January 13, 2025)
    Barron’s Funds Quarterly+ (2024/Q4–January 13, 2025)
    https://www.barrons.com/topics/mutual-funds-quarterly
    (Performance data quoted in this Supplement are for 2024/Q4 and YTD to 12/31/24)
    (No Supplement – it’s all within the main issue)
    Pg 12:2024 was tough for stockpickers. So, look at the holdings of the top funds – LC-PAGDX, LC-BRAGX, MC-RCMFX, SC-HFCGX. Those included Magnificent 7, big tech, financials, energy. What may work for 2025? AI, energy, materials, infrastructure, travel.
    Pg 14: In this Trump market, just follow the leaders. Watch cryptos, the best M* category (Digital Assets) of 2024, followed far behind by the MLPs. Trump and sons have a crypto venture called World Liberty Financial. Bonds and rate sensitive plays (utilities, real estate, etc) were laggards with the exception of financials that should benefit from coming deregulations. Funds related to Trump’s circle of friends did very well – PTIR (2x PLTR), TSLL (2x TSLA), MLXIX (9.6% in ET).
    SP500 has 33% in tech and 13% in financials and did quite well in 2024 with +25% despite softness in stocks in 2024/Q4. The total ETF AUM was over $10 trillion with 4 ETFs among the top 10 being the SP500 ETFs. Inflows into ETFs, including the active ETFs, were strong. Mutual funds had outflows. Foreign funds didn’t do well (the US investor returns were also hurt by a strong dollar). (By @LewisBraham at MFO)
    More on Funds & Retirement
    RETIREMENT. Super Catchup for 401k/403b from 2025. Another Secure 2.0 provision for catchups for 401k, 403b, government 457 and federal TSP kicks in 2025.
    For 55+ $7,500 (regular)
    For 60-63 $11,250 (higher of $10,000 and 150% of regular catchup)
    SIMPLE retirement plan catchups are also adjusted: 55+ $3,500, 60-63 $5,250.
    Priority order – 401k to employer match, Roth IRA, HSA, top off 401k.
    Barron’s weekend issue has CASH TRACK charts showing 4-wMA of flows.
    imagehttps://i.ibb.co/dDw0rm1/Barrons-Cash-Track-011125.png
    Q4 Top 5 Fund Categories (MFOP)
    imagehttps://i.ibb.co/5x4xYCK/MFOP-Quarterly-Top5-010925.png
    Q4 Bottom 5 Fund Categories (MFOP)
    imagehttps://i.ibb.co/R69M4pz/MFOP-Quarterly-Bottom5-010925.png
    LINK
  • PRWCX vs. ITRIX
    PRWCX vs (TCAF+PRCFX)
    If you can't own PRWCX, maybe consider owning a combination of TCAF/PRCFX.
    Using a percentage of the eft TCAF in combination with a percentage of PRCFX one can approximate the same portfolio as PRWCX.
    PRWCX allocation changes dynamically so this is an imprecise science.
    Using PV, you can back test these three funds over the short lifespan of TCAF and PRCFX (1 Year). I found that a combination of approximately (1/3) TCAF and (2/3) PRCFX achieved a slightly better return that PRWCX with similar risk profiles. Maybe, in large part to a lower ER than PRWCX.
    Here's the PV link:
    https://portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&sl=3fHSaFUgvCF0hNyOy10GSc
    As @fundly observed, one can purchase the ITRIX clone w/$100 min through Firstrade. While not an exact copy, it is a faithful clone that mimic's PRWCX's allocations between stock and bonds, and even within stocks.
    My impression is that this dynamic allocation is part of Giroux's secret sauce. Duplication through static allocations dilutes this sauce. According to PV, the proposed admixtures result in 71% large cap stocks, while "the original' currently keeps only 63% of its equity in large caps.
    One year is hardly enough time to get any sort of meaningful impression. Here's the same PV comparison extended back just one extra month, December 2023. Here, PRWCX is the one that achieves a slight better return.
    https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&sl=7lfscKm5n0ACQ13fTdpipc
    What a difference a month makes. 31 little days.

  • PRWCX vs. ITRIX
    PRWCX vs (TCAF+PRCFX)
    If you can't own PRWCX, maybe consider owning a combination of TCAF/PRCFX.
    Using a percentage of the eft TCAF in combination with a percentage of PRCFX one can approximate the same portfolio as PRWCX.
    PRWCX allocation changes dynamically so this is an imprecise science.
    Using PV, you can back test these three funds over the short lifespan of TCAF and PRCFX (1 Year). I found that a combination of approximately (1/3) TCAF and (2/3) PRCFX achieved a slightly better return that PRWCX with similar risk profiles. Maybe, in large part to a lower ER than PRWCX.
    Here's the PV link:
    https://portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&sl=3fHSaFUgvCF0hNyOy10GSc
    Very helpful. Thnx. :)
  • PRWCX vs. ITRIX
    PRWCX vs (TCAF+PRCFX)
    If you can't own PRWCX, maybe consider owning a combination of TCAF/PRCFX.
    Using a percentage of the eft TCAF in combination with a percentage of PRCFX one can approximate the same portfolio as PRWCX.
    PRWCX allocation changes dynamically so this is an imprecise science.
    Using PV, you can back test these three funds over the short lifespan of TCAF and PRCFX (1 Year). I found that a combination of approximately (1/3) TCAF and (2/3) PRCFX achieved a slightly better return that PRWCX with similar risk profiles. Maybe, in large part to a lower ER than PRWCX.
    Here's the PV link:
    https://portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&sl=3fHSaFUgvCF0hNyOy10GSc
  • Retirees Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings - Working Paper - Blanchett & Finke
    Question: How many have turned to annuities or "annuity - like" strategies to increase your income spending?
    When I retired 13 years ago, I attempted to project my future spending needs. Over these years I have meet my spending needs with a combination of pension income (with a COLA), an Annuity Income (Savings that I converted to an Annuity), and some part time work. Since retirement, I have continue to contribute to my HSA and my IRA with contributions from part time work income. Recently I began managing one of my properties as a seasonal rental for additional income. I will work part time spending some of that work income and saving some into an IRA until age 73. My RMDs will then become a forced taxable event that may turn into an income source if needed or taxable savings if not needed.
    What type of a portfolio would you design as an "Annuity - like" strategy for yourself? Maybe a combinations of Balanced mutual funds/EFTs that distribute periodically? Am I describing the 4% rule?
    Shifting from a mindset of saving for retirement to a mindset of confidently spending in retirement is a huge challenge we all face.
    Sourced through Ron Berger's Weekly email Newsletter:
    https://robberger.com/newsletter/
    Working Paper:
    Retirre's Spend Lifetime Income, Not Savings
    Abstract: The shift to defined contribution savings plans means that more retirees must fund spending
    from savings. Prior studies find that there appears to be a behavioral resistance to spending down
    savings after retirement in a manner that is consistent with life cycle models. We explore how lifetime
    income, wage income, capital income, qualified savings, and nonqualified savings are used to fund
    retirement spending. We find that retirees spend far more from lifetime income than other categories of
    wealth. Approximately 80% of lifetime income is consumed, on average, versus only approximately half or
    other available savings and income sources. Overall, the analysis suggests that converting savings into
    lifetime income could increase retirement consumption significantly, especially for married households.
  • Medicare Costs For 2025
    If you have an Health Saving Account, Medicare Part B Premiums and deductibles are eligible for HSA reimbursement.
    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services just announced that monthly costs for Medicare Part B premiums, annual deductible and IRMAA surcharges will rise by a much higher amount, about 5.9%, for 2025.
    https://tipswatch.com/2024/11/15/medicare-costs-for-2025-once-again-are-rising-faster-than-inflation/
    image
  • Tax Rates for 2025 - IRS
    Thanks @yogibearbull.
    I'd like to add (since I just turned 65):
    2025 standard deduction over 65
    There's an additional standard deduction for taxpayers 65 and older and those who are blind. For 2025 that additional amount is $1,600 ($2,000 if unmarried and not a surviving spouse).
    Those eligible can add the extra standard deduction to the regular amount for their filing status. So, a single taxpayer 65 or older (or who is blind) can claim a total standard deduction of $17,000 on their 2025 federal tax return.
    Source:
    https://kiplinger.com/taxes/the-new-standard-deduction-is-here
    Also, found these contribution limits for 2025:
    "Remember there are catch-up provisions that increase some of these limits"
    -I noticed they missed the $1K catch-up provision for HSA
    image
  • Why Stay in Medigap Plan F?
    Zero or low costs for all our meds too (Optum, Costco, CVS)
    The good news is that starting in 2025, drug costs will be capped at $2,000, so exposure isn't unlimited.
    I am learning (first year of Medicare) that there are payment phases with Part D.
    The Premium - (in my case, it is embedded in my Medicare Advantage Premium)
    The Deductible - (Full out of pocket Cost of the RX up to a specific $...in my case $200)
    The Co-payment - (A percentage of the RX cost based on the tier of the drug up to a $ Amount... in my case, $2000).
    I assume my deductible and my copay are additive ($200 +$1800 = $2000). At that point the cost of meds are fully coverage by my plan...whoopie!
    For 2025:
    All must pay for:
    Medicare Part B - which looks like it will be about $185/M (plus IRMAA adjustments)
    Next select between:
    - A Supplemental Plan (Some may include benefits for hearing, eye care... maybe even dental?) or
    - Medicare Advantage Plan (Hearing, Eye care , Dental or Part D may be included)
    Select a Part D Plan (Costs = Premium + as much as $2K of deductibles and co-pays)
    Some Non - required Coverage I plan on having:
    - Dental (My local Dentist offers an in house care plan) - $280 - Covers basic Care - 2 cleanings, x-rays, exams
    - Hearing (Hearing Tests and Hearing aid allowances) - I found that Costco or Easter Seals in our area offered affordable services
    - Eyecare (Eye Tests and Eye glass allowances) - I found that Costco offered affordable services
    Snapshot of maximum Health care costs for 2025:

    Part B= ($185*12) = $2,220
    Medicare Advantage = $1200 (Includes Part D Premium) + Max $2000 Medical Deductible + Part D Potential out of Pocket Max cost of $2000
    Dental Plan - $280 (50% discount of other procedures)
    All of the above costs are close to $7700
    In years where I have mostly Wellness visits I would have costs close to $3700
    Most of this is HSA eligible for reimbursement so I will have decisions to make on how I manage that account going forward.
    Lots to continue to learn and do.
  • Fidelity Medicare Services
    Fidelity has gotten into the Medicare brokerage business. I just sent them a note because, as I conclude in the note, it doesn't yet seem ready for prime time.
    My note to Fidelity:
    I ran across this service at:
    https://medicare.fidelity.com/home/
    I don't need help but wanted to give you some feedback. First, it isn't clear to me what the value-add above Medicare.gov is, unless one speaks to a Fidelity agent.
    More importantly it omits several providers, notably HealthFirst in NYC. According to its website, HealthFirst has more Medicare Advantage customers in the NY metropolitan area than any other insurer. FWIW, it's a good insurer - I used one of its ACA plans.
    It looks like the only companies that Fidelity is listing are national (as opposed to regional) insurers: United Healthcare, Aetna, Cigna, Wellcare (Centene), Anthem. That may make sense from Fidelity's perspective, but it can steer people away from other plans that might suit them better.
    A note advising that this is not a complete list of available plans might help.
    In New York, Fidelity only shows two companies for Medigap plans, Humana and Mutual of Omaha. It omits even some national carriers like United Healthcare and Globe
    Also problematic is omission of information. For example, Cigna True Choice Medicare PPO (Plan H7849-082-000) has a $25 copay for PCP out of network. Fidelity doesn't show this. Likewise, there is a $60 copay for specialists out of network that Fidelity doesn't show. And so on.
    I like Fidelity for one stop shopping (e.g. HSAs). But this particular service does not yet seem ready for prime time.
  • Treacherous September is Leaving Traders Everywhere on Edge - Bloomberg Market Analysis
    BF,
    You won't have to don your Huggies.
    Hussman's funds are up today.
    HSGFX - 2.36%
    HSAFX - 0.32%
    Can't say the same for PHEFX.
    PHEFX - (-1.29%)
  • Follow up to my Schwab discussion
    @larry
    Ty for sharing your experience. I hear you -- Schwab and Fidelity both have their upsides and downsides. Here is how I see them.
    Schwab: Reps are polite, broader selection of mutual funds, real bank, ATM fee rebate does not require a new account. Lower system reliability, customer svc is less efficient, no HSA accounts, high yield MMF cannot be default option
    Fidelity: Reps are efficient, high yield MMF is the default option, free wires, better system reliability, has HSA accounts. Wire form UI to other brokerages is a mess, free ATM fee rebate requires CMA account, not a real bank - a facade to PNC.