ten two-and-two funds Thank you Mr. Snowball.
I opine...
SSTHX - out of the reckoning on first principles. Wells Fargo...FAR GO I.
GABCX - Succession issues.
ZEOIX - not available at Brokerages (I know, I know, I'm being picky)
MWSTX - Just look at the chart and see what happened in 2008. No sirreee...
ENIAX, SEEAX - $100,000K minimum. Nope
ITAAX - After Dot Com Bust can't look at this fund company ever again, just like can't look at Invesco ever again
HLGFX - $1MM minimum, so looked at ONUAX which dropped a M*, then looked at chart around 2008. Nope dee doo.
RPHIX - I own RPHYX
BRASX - BATAX may be more accessible to buy, but BRASX is Corporate Bond and BATAX is Intermediate Bond, and someone please put M* out of business.
So all in all, ZEOIX is it for me looks like...
Question - Where do I get max DD numbers if MFO does not track fund. I own IRNIX and wanted to see how it did. Rolling returns on 1 year basis at M* not looking too bad at first glance, but I'm worried I am not evaluating correctly.
Finally - I also own FPNIX. Thinking RPHYX, RSIVX, IRNIX, FPNIX - I should just chill out.
Cash Alternatives I have been intrigued by GADVX, but never pulled the trigger. I have used RPHYX, RSIVX, LCMAX, MINT, and some free trade ETF
Cash Alternatives Thanks for all of the suggestions! I hold RSIVX which I consider to be in that 3-5 year timeframe. I had found ZEOIX to be intriguing when I had looked before but at least at that point it was not ntf through fidelity. Hopefully that has changed. I will do some research on the other funds listed as well. I appreciate everyone's suggestions.
-psuche98
Cash Alternatives Hmmm...I never heard of PTIAX and it has a maturity out 7-8 years. Need to research. I do own both RPHYX and RSIVX in both taxable and tax deferred accounts.
I am really trying to avoid directly holding fund with the fund company. It is just a pain at tax time. Very few funds I own direct. PTIAX is available at brokerages so its a plus. Funny thing is its municipal bond fund has capital preservation in the goal, PTIAX doesn't, and very wierd part is that for fact sheet of PTIAX it mentioned municipal bonds are undervalued while for THAT funds fact sheet it mentions no such thing.
If anyone aware of any manager interviews or something for PTIAX, kindly link. Google didn't help me out, but then you have to know what to search for.
2016 At A Glance Some other taxable fixed-income mutual fund categories, not well represented in the AGG, with significantly different results
per M* category return pages: multisector +7.6%, bank loan +9.2%, high yield +13.3%, emerging mkts +10.0%.
Short duration high yield funds (not a M* category):
RSIVX +9.9%, OSTIX +11.0%.
Basically you're looking at bond funds whose portfolios land them in the lower left corner of the style box (short term, junk)?
That covers a pretty broad swath of funds. Bank loan funds, obviously. More generally, any floating junk (since the float keeps effective duration small). Also some other funds of interest: DBLTX +2.17%, JUCTX +3.92%, ZEOIX + 4.32%, DFLEX +5.48%, TGBAX +6.61%, BXIAX +14.59%.
2016 At A Glance Some other taxable fixed-income mutual fund categories, not well represented in the AGG, with significantly different results
per M* category return pages: multisector +7.6%, bank loan +9.2%, high yield +13.3%, emerging mkts +10.0%.
Short duration high yield funds (not a M* category):
RSIVX +9.9%, OSTIX +11.0%.
Rising rates and what to do! All of the above illustrates the dilemma of finding a way to wring income out of a sector ( Bonds) that is so overbought. Look what has happened to Munis in the last two weeks.. an entire year's income gone.
I had a large position in FFHRX in May 2015 after which it lost 9% in the next nine months, souring me on BL funds for a while
Kiplinger's Income Newsletter portfolio ( widely diversified with MLPs, Taxable and Muni Bond Funds, Dividend stocks) has had an income return of about 16 % since 1/1/2014 (about 6% a year) but the principal has declined 5% in that time so a retiree would see their nest egg shrink (and it was far worse in March before the current rebound in energy!)
A quick M* chart from May 2015 to March 2016 of some of the above funds shows losses of up to 8% ( RSIVX ), and of course those funds with the higher yields lost the most. PONDX somehow sailed right thru, but the leverage is a huge concern.
No one has mentioned ZEOIX which held up nicely but still pays 2.4% . Maybe better to accept a lower income stream (if you can) than to see your money melt away as rates rise.
There is no such thing as a free lunch