Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • MAPIX dividend update.
    @mrdarcey, A lot of questions unanswered as Matthews has not been very transparent in this whole issue. There is supposed to be a report out this month I think and whether there is a better explanation of what happened remains to be seen. If anything has bothered some of us, it is this.
    Agreed. The earlier explanation seemed to be that the sale of PFICs generated capital losses/gains that were taxed at some bizarre rate. That seemed pretty straightforward to me.
    This explanation seems to be that PFICs are taxed at a higher rate specifically because they are passthrough income, and that the sales have nothing to do with it.
    Again, devil in the details, but those are two different explanations as I read it, which is pretty maddening.
    Beyond that, though, if a substantial portion of your income is being used just to pay taxes on certain holdings, what is the total return potential?
  • MAPIX dividend update.
    @expatsp, I have had no problems with MAPIX and the returns. In recent months it has pared back quite a bit from its high. Most Asia funds have had their struggles as talks of slowdown in China are on the increase. I have been in it for some time now and still have good gains.
    But it is still on a short leash for me.
  • A Portfolio Review Question
    I think you might be interested in this. I think it is correct and you have time to adjust your portfolio.
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/schifrin...dlach-king-me/
    Here is the new bond king’s view of the world today:
    The Fed may raise the federal funds rate for the wrong reasons.
    “They don’t really need the rates to be higher, but they seem to want to reload the gun so they aren’t stuck at zero without any tools.”
    Deflationary forces will accelerate if the Fed raises rates.
    “With a tightening, the dollar is going to not just be strong, but it will run up like a scalded dog. If that happens, then commodity prices are going down, we will import deflation and you will see an episode of deflationary scare.”
    The long end of the Treasury curve will stay put and possibly go down further.
    “There’s a 30% chance that importing deflation creates a panic into Treasurys creating a ‘melt-up,’ moving rates to German Bund levels today of around 1%.
    It’s not okay to own risk assets when the Fed starts hiking rates.
    “What is fascinating is, if you sell junk bonds and buy Treasurys, the minute the Fed hikes the first time, going back to 1980, in every case you did well.”
    Don’t be surprised to see the yield curve flatten and possibly invert.
    “Long rates have done nothing but fall. That tells me the market is saying to the Fed, ‘Go ahead, make my day.’ The curve is going to invert when and if fed funds hit 2.5 to 3%.”
    Be long the dollar, especially in emerging market bonds.
    “We have been all dollar [denominated in our foreign bond holdings] since 2011. For a while it didn’t really matter, but now it matters a lot. If you are nondollar you are really in trouble.”
    Stay away from homebuilders, TIPs and mortgage REITs, and oil will fall further.
    “I am convinced the Saudis want the price of a barrel of oil to go to $70. They don’t care if they run a short-term deficit if it slows down U.S. fracking and turns the screws on countries in their region that mean them harm.”
    As we get closer to 2020 interest rates and inflation (and taxes) could really start rising.
    “We are in the calm right now before the hurricane. I’m talking about the aging of the great powers, which is undeniable and can’t be quickly reversed. The retiree-to-worker ratios, the size of labor forces globally. China will have no one in the labor force. Italy’s losing 39% of labor force in the next generation and a half. Japan has an implosion of working population and no immigration. Russia is facing one of the greatest demographic crisis in the history of the world, absent famine, war and disease. It’s pretty bad. Italy has no hope,” says Gundlach matter-of-factly.
    “The Federal Reserve bought the bonds from the deficits of 2011, 2012 and 2013, and those will roll off increasingly over time. Come 2020 you are not just financing massive entitlements like Social Security and Medicare but also old debt. No one talks about that. It’s a big deal. China doesn’t have the demographics to buy that debt. Who’s going to buy it?”
    The coming debt storm–which Gundlach says is too early to worry about tactically–will hit financial markets just as DoubleLine approaches its tenth anniversary in business.
    Giant pension funds and endowments are typically plodding in the redeployment of assets because it often requires coordinating board meetings, soliciting bids from new firms, listening to presentations and gathering votes. But with tens of billions likely to shift out of PIMCO over the next few months, DoubleLine is buzzing with activity. The task at hand is proving to existing clients and to new ones that the drama days are over and DoubleLine is all grown up.
  • The Hidden Truth About Rebalancing Your Portfolio
    This is interesting. I have often wondered about the wisdom of rebalancing into a falling knife although I have sometimes done it. However, periodically clipping away at winners does make sense to me as a way to preserve some of the gains. I looked through the detailed paper and its comments about momentum but its too complicated for my relatively passive style. The main initial take away for me is to think harder about rebalancing into a still declining market even if the calendar says to do it. Delaying action in that case may be wiser.
  • So? Does one just go all in for Healthcare sectors to make a buck today?
    Hi @kevindow
    Not that M & A is not taking place in other sectors, too; but because of large capital outlays R & D in the bio/health area, I feel the M & A will continue to be stronger in this sector versus other areas. With this (M&A) supporting pricing going forward in the broad healthcare sector.
    This is obviously just my opinion and viewpoint; and perhaps I am offbase with this view, but one of the overall reasons for our investments in "health".
    Take care,
    Catch
  • 2014 estimated (preliminary) year end distributions
    With many thanks to Charles for his help, the Capital Gains link (below) has been updated as of 12/10 to include Heartland Funds, Pinnacle Value Fund, Robeco Funds, and Westchester Capital Funds (i.e. Merger Fund), Janus (final estimates), Vanguard and Bogle. Viewers should check at the link below. With posters' contributions of links, they have alphabetized into the link below.
    http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/resources/capital-gains/
  • a quick survey: which managers write letters that are worth reading?
    Late with my answer but Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital Group is always a good read. ( Firm manages VCVSX.
  • Jeff Gundlach Correctly Predicted The Dollar Would Break Out — Here's What He's Saying Now
    Here's DXY (US Dollar Index)
    image
    The US Dollar has been used extensively in transactions of "Carry Trade".
    Here's an article on what may be changing due to the strength of the USD:
    raoul-pal-dollar-chart
    Article's final line:
    "$5trn carry trade — with China at the epicenter."
    Others chime in on the strengthening US dollar:
    Jeff Saut:
    2015?
    Worth Wray (quotes from Kyle Bass):
    "In the autumn of 2009, Kyle Bass told me a scary story that I did not understand until the first “taper tantrum” in May 2013.
    He said that – in addition to a likely string of sovereign defaults in Europe and an outright currency collapse in Japan – the global debt drama would end with an epic US dollar rally, a dramatic reversal in capital flows, and an absolute bloodbath for emerging markets.
    Extending that outlook, my friends Mark Hart and Raoul Pal warned that China – seen then by many as the world’s rising power and the most resilient economy in the wake of the global crisis – would face an outright economic collapse, an epic currency crisis, or both."

    how a stronger-dollar-affect-emerging-markets
    Ivy Funds:
    stronger-us-dollar-may-have-far-reaching-impact
    Kyle Bass (dollar to $1.20 in 12 months):
    video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000322711
    Schwab Insight:
    strong-us-dollar-changes-everything
    Forbes:
    strong-dollar-weak-china-puts-gold-in-crosshairs/
    5 US dollar etfs:
    etf-us-dollar/
  • Morningstar's Portfolio Manager Price Updating Concern ...
    Like the rest of you, my own TIME is valuable enough, so I don't anymore keep going back to check if M* is finally, finally updated each evening. I just don't EXPECT it to be correct and accurate until the late hours. I never bothered with what they call a "transaction" portfolio, recording all cap gains and pay-outs, to get my own personal "investor earnings" rather than to rely just on their published statistics for the funds. Yes, I have a porfolio at Yahoo. But it's just a tracking list to check against Morningstar, which always "brings up the rear." I often see, at Morningstar, that when I click on a particular fund in my M* portfolio (evening,) the updated share price is correct, but not yet entered --- for a long time--- over at the Portfolio Manager! .... I still keep my simple portfolio at Morningstar only because it has been my experience that it's the most user-friendly. Too bad it's so always damn tardy with info, though. I see contradictions on its "performance" pages for funds, compared to its daily calculations, also. I think that's because the performance comparisons are done MONTHLY, only? Another fly in the ointment. Yes, M* sucks it, but I tried loading-in my portfolio at other sites including google, and M* is still simplest and user-friendly. Unless you want news and daily share prices that are fresh when you go to look and read!
  • a quick survey: which managers write letters that are worth reading?
    In terms of US funds, I like Whitebox, Marketfield, Wintergreen (although I don't always agree, I think his recent battle with Coke was kind of absurd) and Seafarer for solid letters. Tekla's outstanding investor day presentation from earlier this year (which I'd missed) got me more excited about owning their funds and I've added recently - I hope they do another presentation next year.
    They're brief and it's not a US fund, but it's interesting to hear from Jacob Rothschild a couple of times per year via RIT Capital Partners letters (ritcap.com)
  • Morningstar's Portfolio Manager Price Updating Concern ...
    @Old_Skeet said:
    knowing what providers others are using to combine all of their funds together and also to track multi accounts.
    I just use open libreoffice spreadsheet, click a button that automatically downloads last quote from yahoo.
    I manually add lt cap gain, income, and st cap gains.
    http://www.libreoffice.org/
    one example here:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=automatic+download+stock+prices+in+libreoffice
    all kinds of sample spreadsheets here:
    http://www.gummy-stuff.org/Tutorials.htm
    http://www.gummy-stuff.org/spreadsheets.htm
    http://www.gummy-stuff.org/TA.htm
    http://www.financialwisdomforum.org/gummy-stuff/gummy_stuff.htm
    provided you know spreadsheets or want to learn, or want to bother doing it yourself.
    yahoo always seems to have up to date quotes, so the spreadsheet is pretty accurate, provided you update distribution info.
  • iShares Frontier ETF’s Monster Cap Gains
    FYI: iShares recently released its estimated capital-gains distributions for 2014. And, not surprisingly, the iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM | D-68) expects to pay out capital gains of $0.91-1.11 per share, amounting to roughly 6.3-7.6 percent of its closing net asset value on Nov. 20.
    The exact distribution amount isn’t yet known, but this confirms that FM will in fact pay out a massive distribution on Dec. 24, with an ex-dividend date of Dec. 17.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.etf.com/sections/blog/23949-ishares-frontier-etfs-monster-cap-gains.html?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=
  • Manager Change at Meridian Funds
    As MFO reports, Meridian Equity Income Fund is changing managers. Minyoung Sohn is taking the reins. He apparently earned a good but short record [3 years] with Janus Growth and Income.
    I’ve been invested in this small Meridian fund since the day it opened. My investment has more than doubled, and I liked the conservative value approach of its experienced managers [the same people who manage Meridian Contrarian Fund, formerly Meridian Value Fund].
    I’ve experienced many manager changes over the years [always an unsettling experience if you had confidence in the founding managers. The most distressing was when Michael Price sold his Mutual Series funds to Franklin Templeton].
    The first result of this change at Meridian Equity Income is that the fund almost immediately issued a large capital gain. This occurred because the new manager sold a large number of holdings so he could invest in stocks that meet his different investing style. I suspect the distribution was made early [before December] to prevent existing shareholders from selling the fund in an effort to avoid the large capital gain distribution. [Fewer shareholders to share the taxable gain obligation] [Last year, Meridian Growth Fund also sold a large portion of its holdings as its new managers implemented their investment style].
    The second result of this change of managers is that my money will now be invested in a more growth than value style.
    I plan to keep my money in this small fund and give the new manager an opportunity to impress me. But these manager changes may be an argument in favor of investing in ETFs.
    Does anyone have any thoughts about Minyoung Sohn?
  • Creating a More Tax-Efficient Portfolio
    Nice post msf. It looks like neither the Vanguard 500 Index fund VFIAX nor the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund VTSAX have had any capital gains distributions in the past 10 years
    Source: https://advisors.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/advisor/investments/price?fundId=0540#state=30
    And the tax cost ratio and tax adjusted returns for VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market Index ETF) and VTSAX (Admiral shares, Total Stock Market Index Fund) were just about identical over 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, per Morningstar.
  • Creating a More Tax-Efficient Portfolio
    Sometimes ETFs are not more tax efficient.
    Vanguard Admiral class shares and ETF class shares are identical in tax efficiency. Vanguard Investor class shares, which are a poorer choice, are inherently more tax efficient.
    For example, for the Vanguard 500 fund, its admiral share class (VFIAX) and ETF share class (VOO) have 1 year tax cost ratios of 0.83%, and 3 year tax cost ratios of 0.57%. (VOO doesn't go out five years.)
    VFINX, the investor share class, has corresponding tax cost ratios of 0.78% and 0.53%.
    The reasons are twofold:
    1) These are different share classes of the same (not merely identical) portfolio, so they share equally in the realized gains.
    2) Interest and dividends of the underlying stocks are used to pay the ERs. So the higher the ER of a share class, the less that is distributed in the way of income dividends. That means that the higher the ER, the higher the tax efficiency (lower dividends).
    It's the same idea as hoping a fund will have small distributions because it made little money. Not something to be hoped for.
    Admiral shares and ETF shares currently have the same ERs, so they'll have the same tax efficiency. All else being equal, the ETF will lose a little bit on a round trip, because of the bid/ask spread that is absent from the other share classes.
  • Your Roth IRA in retirement
    I think this depends on a great many factors, including age, tax situation, etc.
    (my age 69.5)
    We got into Roths late - doing a conversion of a portion of our Traditional near the '09 market bottom and after we had already begun taking SS benefits. Initially it was 100% invested in aggressive global growth funds because they were among the most beaten-up when we converted. Now, we're more interested in protecting our sizeable tax free gains (counter to the traditional approach to Roths).
    Roth now comprises nearly half our investments. it's still a bit more aggressively positioned than the Traditional IRA portion - but not that much so. Mostly balanced funds along with a portion in diversified income funds. I will say the Roth contains what I consider the finest funds we own - so overall quality of the Roth investments is better - and it continues to out-perform the Traditional IRA. Kinda begs the question: Why don't we move everything to those select funds? Go figure.
    Future uses? (1) Would be handy should we encounter some unexpected major expense - as wouldn't incur the tax cost pulling from the Traditional would. (2) Since Roths aren't subject to RMD, we'll be able to protect that tax-sheltered portion longer than otherwise.
    PS: Goal is to run completely out of money the day before we die. :)
  • a quick survey: which managers write letters that are worth reading?
    Maybe there is one more category: the manager remains completely silent as in the semi-annual report from Brown Capital Management I just received.
  • Fidelity Fifty Fund to reorganize
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/35348/000003534814000086/Main.htm
    Supplement to the
    Fidelity Fifty®
    August 29, 2014
    Prospectus
    Proposed Reorganization. The Board of Trustees of each of Fidelity Hastings Street Trust and Fidelity Capital Trust has unanimously approved an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization ("Agreement") between Fidelity Fifty® and Fidelity® Focused Stock Fund pursuant to which Fidelity Fifty® would be reorganized on a tax-free basis with and into Fidelity® Focused Stock Fund.
    The Agreement provides for the transfer of all of the assets of Fidelity Fifty in exchange for shares of Fidelity Focused Stock Fund equal in value to the net assets of Fidelity Fifty and the assumption by Fidelity Focused Stock Fund of all of the liabilities of Fidelity Fifty. After the exchange, Fidelity Fifty will distribute the Fidelity Focused Stock Fund shares to its shareholders pro rata, in liquidation of Fidelity Fifty. As a result, shareholders of Fidelity Fifty will become shareholders of Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (these transactions are collectively referred to as the "Reorganization").
    A Special Meeting (the "Meeting") of the Shareholders of Fidelity Fifty is expected to be held during the second quarter of 2015 and approval of the Agreement will be voted on at that time. A combined proxy statement and prospectus containing more information with respect to the Reorganization will be provided to shareholders of record of Fidelity Fifty in advance of the meeting.
    If the Agreement is approved at the Meeting and certain conditions required by the Agreement are satisfied, the Reorganization is expected to take place on or about June 5, 2015. If shareholder approval of the Agreement is delayed due to failure to meet a quorum or otherwise, the Reorganization will become effective, if approved, as soon as practicable thereafter.
    The foregoing is not a solicitation of any proxy. For a free copy of the Proxy Statement describing the Reorganization (and containing important information about fees, expenses and risk considerations) and a Prospectus for Fidelity Focused Stock Fund, please call 1-800-544-8544. The prospectus/proxy statement will also be available for free on the Securities and Exchange Commission's web site (www.sec.gov).