Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund to close to new investors
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1016073/000119312517278810/d456584d497.htm
    497 1 d456584d497.htm 497
    Driehaus Mutual Funds
    Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund *DMCRX
    (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated September 7, 2017 to
    Prospectus for the Fund dated April 30, 2017 and
    Summary Prospectus for the Fund dated April 30, 2017
    The Board of Trustees of the Driehaus Mutual Funds has approved the closure of the Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (the “Fund”) to new investors, except as described below. The closure will be effective immediately after 4:00 pm Eastern Time on September 29, 2017.
    You may purchase Fund shares and reinvest dividends and capital gains you receive on your holdings of Fund shares in additional shares of the Fund if you are:
    • A current Fund shareholder;
    • A participant in a qualified retirement plan that offers the Fund as an investment option or that has the same or a related plan sponsor as another qualified retirement plan that offers the Fund as an investment option; or
    • A financial advisor or registered investment adviser whose clients have Fund accounts.
    You may open a new account in the Fund if you:
    • Are an employee of Driehaus Capital Management LLC (the “Adviser”) or its affiliates or a Trustee of Driehaus Mutual Funds;
    • Hold shares of the Fund in another account, provided your new account and your existing account are registered under the same address of record, the same primary Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number, the same name(s), and the same beneficial owner(s); or
    • Are a financial advisor or registered investment adviser whose clients have Fund accounts.
    These restrictions apply to investments made directly through Driehaus Securities LLC, the Fund’s distributor, as well as investments made through intermediaries. Intermediaries that maintain omnibus accounts are not allowed to open new sub-accounts for new investors, unless the investor meets the criteria listed above. Once an account is closed, additional investments will not be accepted unless you meet the criteria listed above. Investors may be required to demonstrate eligibility to purchase shares of the Fund before an investment is accepted. The Fund reserves the right to (i) eliminate any of the exceptions listed above and impose additional restrictions on purchases of Fund shares; and (ii) make additional exceptions that, in the Adviser’s judgment, do not adversely affect its ability to manage the Fund.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
    For more information, please call Driehaus Mutual Funds at (800) 560-6111.
  • Big Critic Of ETFs Planning To Launch One Of His Own
    FYI: Like many active managers, Mark Yusko of Morgan Creek Capital Management LLC has some serious gripes about the rise of exchange-traded funds and the ascendancy of passive investing.
    And like many of those managers, he’s also starting his own ETF to cash in on their popularity -- but with a twist.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.fa-mag.com/news/big-critic-of-etfs-planning-to-launch-one-of-his-own-34517.html?print
  • Late? That’ll Cost You 50%: (RMD)
    @bee - we've had exchanges on these things before. If these particular strategies work for you, more power to you. They do seem to carry some assumptions that may not apply to some other people, so they're worth pointing out.

    I have a few personal strategy for dealing with RMDs. Consider strategically spending down these taxable IRA dollars first rather than raiding taxable accounts, Roth accounts or Health Savings Accounts, especially between the years of 59.5 and 70.5.
    I'm guessing you're doing this to keep RMDs manageable, i.e. not growing so large that they kick you into a higher tax bracket.
    Say you need $20k/year. You seem to be suggesting that you withdraw approx $23.5K (so that after paying 15% tax, you've got your $20K for expenses). If your taxable account is generating no income (just cap gains when you sell), that works fine for you, since you'd be paying no cap gains tax in that tax bracket.
    An alternative for some would be to tap the taxable account for the $20K in expenses, withdraw the same $23.5K from the IRA (pay the same $3.5K taxes on that), and put the rest ($20K) into a Roth as a conversion.
    Comparing the two strategies - either way, you get $20K to spend, and you've reduced your traditional IRA by $23.5. The difference is that the first way left you with $20K in the taxable account (you spent the IRA distribution), the second way let you move $20K into a Roth (you spent money from a taxable account).

    Fund an H.S.A:
    -Between the age of 59.5 and 65 (when you become medicare eligible) distribute a portion of your tax deferred IRA yearly equal to your maximum H.S.A contribution. This will provide a funding source for my H.S.A as well as make these IRA distributions tax free since there tax liability will be offset by the H.S.A contribution (income tax credit) for that same year.
    You're get an income reduction for the HSA contribution regardless of what's generating the income. That taxable income could be coming from taxable investments or from IRA distributions, or even from a Roth conversion. What matters is that you've got a fixed size "deduction" (the HSA contribution). So the IRA distribution is tax-free (due to the HSA) only to the extent that you have no other ordinary (taxable) income.
    For example, if you contribute $4K to your HSA, and have $1K in taxable income, then only the first $3K of IRA distributions will be tax-free. If you withdraw $4K, then your total taxable income is $5k, and $1k of that is taxable after subtracting off the $4K HSA contribution.

    Fund Itemize Medical Expenses:
    - Between ages (65 -70.5) track medical expenses that are eligible as an itemized tax deduction. Do not use your H.S.A dollars during this time frame to pay for these medical costs. Instead, pay all of these medical expenses with yearly IRA distributions. Using IRA distributions as the funding source for medical related expenses may potentially lowering your taxes on these taxable distributions.
    You can use medical expenses as itemized deductions (subject to a floor of 7.5% or 10% of AGI). To do that, you're right, you can't pay them out of an HSA. This works for some people, but only if they've got really high expenses (relative to their AGI), and if they've got enough other itemized deductions to get them above the standardized deduction. At least I think that's what you're writing about here.
    Each person's situation is different. This strategy seems to work fine for yours.
  • The Breakfast Briefing Wall Street Stocks Set For Downbeat Open As North Korea Standoff Intensifie
  • Janus' The Health and Fitness ETF to liquidate
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1500604/000119312517273155/d447144d497.htm
    497 1 d447144d497.htm 497
    Janus Detroit Street Trust
    The Health and Fitness ETF
    Supplement dated August 30, 2017
    to Currently Effective Prospectus and
    Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”)
    The Board of Trustees of Janus Detroit Street Trust (the “Trust”) approved a plan to liquidate and terminate The Health and Fitness ETF (the “Fund”), effective on or about October 2, 2017 (the “Liquidation Date”). After the close of business on or about September 26, 2017, the Fund will no longer accept creation orders. Trading in the Fund will be halted prior to market open on or about September 27, 2017. Proceeds of the liquidation are currently scheduled to be sent to shareholders on or about October 3, 2017. Termination of the Fund is expected to occur as soon as practicable following the liquidation.
    Prior to and through the close of trading on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) on September 26, 2017, the Fund will undertake the process of closing down and liquidating its portfolio. This process may result in the Fund holding cash and securities that may not be consistent with its investment objective and strategies. During this period, the Fund is likely to incur higher tracking error than is typical for the Fund. Furthermore, during the time between market open on September 27, 2017 and the Liquidation Date, because shares will not be traded on NASDAQ, there may not be a trading market for the Fund’s shares.
    Shareholders may sell shares of the Fund on NASDAQ until the market close on September 26, 2017 and may incur typical transaction fees from their broker-dealer. Shares held as of the close of business on the Liquidation Date will be automatically liquidated for cash at the current net asset value. Proceeds of the liquidation will be paid through the broker-dealer with whom you hold shares of the Fund. Shareholders will generally recognize a capital gain or loss on the liquidation proceeds. The Fund may or may not, depending upon the Fund’s circumstances, pay one or more dividends or other distributions prior to or along with the liquidation payments. Please consult your personal tax advisor about the potential tax consequences.
    After the Liquidation Date, all references to the Fund will be deemed to have been removed from the SAI.
  • RBC liquidates several funds
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1272950/000089710117001041/rbc172312_497.htm
    RBC FUNDS TRUST
    RBC BlueBay Absolute Return Fund
    RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Corporate Bond Fund
    RBC BlueBay Global Convertible Bond Fund
    RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Unconstrained Fixed Income Fund
    (All Share Classes)
    Supplement dated August 25, 2017 to the RBC BlueBay Funds’ Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated January 27, 2017 (as may be supplemented from time to time)
    Notice of Liquidation of the RBC BlueBay Absolute Return Fund, RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Corporate Bond Fund, RBC BlueBay Global Convertible Bond Fund and RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Unconstrained Fixed Income Fund (the “Funds”). The Board of Trustees of the Funds has approved the liquidation and dissolution of the Funds on or about September 28, 2017 (the “Liquidation Date”). Effective immediately, the Funds may depart from their stated investment objectives and strategies as they increase their cash holdings in preparation for their liquidations. Each Fund shall distribute pro rata to its shareholders of record all of the assets of the Fund in complete cancellation and redemption of all of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest, except for cash, bank deposits or cash equivalents in an estimated amount necessary to (i) discharge any unpaid liabilities and obligations of the Fund on the Fund’s books on the Liquidation Date, including, but not limited to, income dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, payable through the Liquidation Date, and (ii) pay such contingent liabilities as the officers of the Fund deem appropriate, subject to ratification by the Board. Capital gain distributions, if any, may be paid on or prior to the Liquidation Date.
    Effective on or about August 28, 2017, the Funds will suspend all purchases and exchanges into the Funds other than purchases through dividend reinvestment, in order to facilitate an orderly liquidation. You may redeem your Fund shares at any time before the liquidation, as the Fund will continue to process redemptions in the ordinary course until the Liquidation Date. No sales charge, contingent deferred sales load or redemption fee will be imposed in connection with a redemption. If you do not redeem your Fund shares prior to the Liquidation Date, the Fund will automatically redeem your shares and forward the proceeds to you based on the instructions listed on your account.
    If you are invested in the Fund through a tax-deferred account (e.g., an IRA) and you do not arrange to liquidate the shares held in such account prior to the Fund liquidation date, the liquidation proceeds will be reinvested in shares of the U.S. Government Money Market Fund, the shares of which will continue to be held in the tax-deferred account until you provide instructions. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation.
    The sale, exchange or liquidation of your shares will generally be a taxable event. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation.
    INVESTORS SHOULD RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1272950/000089710117001040/rbc172308_497.htm
    497 1 rbc172308_497.htm 497
    RBC FUNDS TRUST
    RBC Mid Cap Value Fund
    (All Share Classes)
    Supplement dated August 25, 2017 to the RBC Equity Funds’ Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated January 27, 2017 (as may be supplemented from time to time)
    Notice of Liquidation of the RBC Mid Cap Value Fund (the “Fund”). The Board of Trustees of the Fund has approved the liquidation and dissolution of the Fund on or about September 28, 2017 (the “Liquidation Date”). Effective immediately, the Fund may depart from its stated investment objective and strategy as it increases its cash holdings in preparation for its liquidation. The Fund shall distribute pro rata to its shareholders of record all of the assets of the Fund in complete cancellation and redemption of all of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest, except for cash, bank deposits or cash equivalents in an estimated amount necessary to (i) discharge any unpaid liabilities and obligations of the Fund on the Fund’s books on the Liquidation Date, including, but not limited to, income dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, payable through the Liquidation Date, and (ii) pay such contingent liabilities as the officers of the Fund deem appropriate, subject to ratification by the Board. Capital gain distributions, if any, may be paid on or prior to the Liquidation Date.
    Effective on or about August 28, 2017, the Fund will suspend all purchases and exchanges into the Fund other than purchases through dividend reinvestment, in order to facilitate an orderly liquidation. You may redeem your Fund shares at any time before the liquidation, as the Fund will continue to process redemptions in the ordinary course until the Liquidation Date. No sales charge, contingent deferred sales load or redemption fee will be imposed in connection with a redemption. If you do not redeem your Fund shares prior to the Liquidation Date, the Fund will automatically redeem your shares and forward the proceeds to you based on the instructions listed on your account.
    If you are invested in the Fund through a tax-deferred account (e.g., an IRA) and you do not arrange to liquidate the shares held in such account prior to the Fund liquidation date, the liquidation proceeds will be reinvested in shares of the U.S. Government Money Market Fund, the shares of which will continue to be held in the tax-deferred account until you provide instructions. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation.
    The sale, exchange or liquidation of your shares will generally be a taxable event. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation.
    INVESTORS SHOULD RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
  • First Trust Launches The First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities And Income ETF: (FPEI)
    Preferred stocks are said to be targeted at institutions if they have a $1k par value? These just sound like vanilla bonds, most of which have a $1K face value.
    Admittedly most preferred stocks, unlike most bonds, are for smaller denominations. But the vitality of the bond market, especially munis where individual investors tend to dominate, illustrates that a $1K denomination isn't really much of a deterrent to individual investors seeking income streams.
    Institutional preferreds tend to be sold OTC, just like bonds, not via private placements. From the summary prospectus: "Institutional preferred securities are targeted to institutional, rather than retail, investors, are generally traded over-the-counter and may also be known as “$1,000 par preferred securities.”
    FWIW, what came to my mind is that the tax treatment for corporate investors in preferreds is usually more favorable than the tax treatment to individual investors. In that sense, one can say that most preferreds are targeted to institutional investors (like insurance companies and banks).
    An insurance company in the 35% tax bracket would pay only 10.5% tax on the dividends, because 70% are excluded. In contrast, the typical individual investor would pay 15%, 25%, 28% or even more. Just as munis are "targeted" to high income investors (because they get a bigger tax advantage from the tax-free nature of munis), vanilla preferreds may be said to target institutional investors, since institutions get a bigger tax advantage than individuals.
    Piper Jaffray, Prfeferred Stock: Stocks That Act Like Bonds
    There's a relatively new type of preferred (about a quarter century old) that does puts individuals on a level playing field. It's sometimes called a hybrid preferred stock and more formally called a fixed rate capital security (FRCS). No 70 percent exclusion here. I'd guess that this fund stays away from these preferreds.
    Here's an old AAII article describing the structure of FRCSs noting that "Monthly income preferred securities (MIPS) are geared as a fixed-income alternative for retail investors."
    AAII Journal (July 1997), Hybrid Securities: A Basic Look at Monthly Income Preferred Stock
  • State of the Markets in Five Charts (SPY,IWM,HYG,AGG,GLD)
    This time of year these five guys (SPY, IWM, HYG, AGG, GLD) are best digested with a burger and fries from a different Five Guys washed down with a chocolate shake.

    From David Fabian and FMD Capital:
    The summer is rapidly closing and a new season will shortly be upon us. The seasonality of the markets this time of year has always been a tricky proposition as well. With that in mind, I’m going to outline my current thoughts on some of the big picture charts.
    state-market-5-charts-august-2017image
  • Ben Carlson: When To Sell Your Investments
    FYI: A reader asks:
    I wanted your advice about when do you recommend one sells holdings that have appreciated? I understand the concept of buying low but would appreciate your advice on when to sell. I understand reversion to the mean and have been guilty in the past of holding on too long, only to see all the gains melt away as the market corrected.
    This is a topic that probably doesn’t get enough time share for investors. All of investing is more of an art than a science but there are plenty of books and research papers written about what to buy but very few about when to sell.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://awealthofcommonsense.com/2017/08/when-to-sell-your-investments/
  • VMVFX -- Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility
    @AndyJ, Concur with your assessment. USD has been declining versus other currencies since Jan 2017 and it negatively impact funds which use currency hedging strategy for this year.
    Last I reviewed VWVFX, it has over 30% allocated to mid- and small-cap and the median market capitalization is lower than ACWV, which is dominated by large caps. Similar investment strategy used in both fund/ETF, but the approaches are not equivalent. For maximum tax efficiency, ACWV create little or no long term capital gain since the benchmark is revised once a year; thus more suitable for taxable accounts. VWVFX is actively managed that generated small capital gain (turnover is in the teens) in the last several year.
  • AQR Capital Management Seeks Approval From SEC To Sell ETFs
    FYI: One of the most profitable quant money managers may soon be taking a dive into the hot exchange-traded fund industry.
    AQR Capital Management, the $195 billion firm co-founded by Cliff Asness, last week asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for what’s called exemptive relief for index-based and transparent actively managed ETFs -- the first step necessary to start a fund. If the permission is granted, the firm would have the legal go-ahead to offer the ETFs at any point in the future.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.fa-mag.com/news/aqr-capital-management-seeks-approval-from-sec-to-sell-etfs-34333.html?print
  • Better Than Expected, Barely Good Enough: Profits And Stocks

    "The seasonal trend is for stocks to go soft during the summer ... especially, August."
    Just off-the-cuff (without further research) I'd tend to agree. Some of the worst stock market sell-offs seem to have occurred in late summer or early fall. The '29 crash, the '07-'09 debacle, and a one-day drop of more than 20% in '87. However, unlike some, I would never risk being substantially underweight equities or largely absent from the markets out of some kind of observance of this historical pattern. To me there's just too big a risk of making an incorrect call and missing out on big gains.
    Isn't investing interesting?
    I'd agree Ol'Skeet. I consider that's a good reason to follow the postings at MFO and indulge in other
    financial print/electronic media. As you well know, however, there are some (well ... 1 in particular here) who profess to find the ebb and flow of markets of little no interest and who are content to "peek" at their investments only once or twice a year. Different strokes for different folks.
  • Any reason to pick up Vanguard PrimeCap funds?
    If you're young, willing to stay in a fund for a long time despite volatility, and can sleep well at night after a potential significant decline, you could add Capital Opportunity. If it were me, I'd be happy with POGRX, and just sit tight. If you overlay these funds on the same graph, you'll see they all have very similar performance profiles. The two that are somewhat different are Capital Opportunity, and Primecap Odyssey Aggressive Growth, which I would characterize as being more aggressive (and therefore somewhat more volatile) than the others (which are very similar to each other). I was fortunate to open an account in POAGX several years ago, and am very happy with it; I plan to hold it for a long time.
  • Any reason to pick up Vanguard PrimeCap funds?
    I currently own shares in POGRX (PrimeCap Odyssey Growth), and recently got Flagship status with Vanguard which now gives me the opportunity to purchase their PrimeCap managed funds (VPCCX, VPMCX, VHCOX). It looks like they all have a good deal of overlap, but wondered if anyone thought it was worth it to put some money in the Vanguard funds, or just continue to contribute to my Odyssey Growth fund? If I was, I've considered going with Capital Opportunity (VHCOX) as I've read that it's the closest comparison to PrimeCaps's Aggressive Growth fund (POAGX), which I've wanted to get in to, but it's closed. Do you think that VHCOX is different enough from POGRX (or close enough to POAGX) that it's worth it?
  • Jeff Gundlach Has Been Bashing The WSJ For A Story It's Still Working On
    FYI: DoubleLine Capital is engaged in an unusual media relations campaign against the Wall Street Journal, attacking reporters on Twitter and in emails to rival news organizations for a story that has yet to be published.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bloomberg.com//news/articles/2017-08-17/gundlach-attacks-wsj-for-doubleline-story-it-s-still-reporting
  • GMO White Paper: The S&P 500: Just Say No
    Hello,
    For what it is worth ...
    It is the many perspectives, strategies and thoughts put into action that make the markets. And, yes I invest to put coins in my pocket to improve my standard of living. From my own experience you have to get beyond the fear of loosing some money along the way to become a winner and enjoy the benefits of success. I have found that, for me, it is best to harvest profits from my portfolio along the way to keep the unrealized gains from becoming vaporized in stock market downdrafts. And, also to have a sell down (not sell out) strategy in place as the markets decline to raise some cash if one is short of it within their asset allocation.
    I feel it better to maintain a well diverisfied portfolio over just being invested in the S&P 500 Index. But, in just investing in the 500 Index through the years can make you a winner even though it is not my preferred way. In investing the concept is to grow your principal over time while in trading it is to make profit over short time spans.
    Skeet
  • GMO White Paper: The S&P 500: Just Say No
    @BobC. Not so sure. I lost half my portfolio in dot com bust. I lost 22-23% in Financial Crisis. Only because I sold.
    It is true I also didn't enjoy the gains after 2008 that one would have done simply buying and holding. However, I'm not sure I am worse for it. I'm more objective now because I was more "active". Sometimes that's better than deer caught in headlights.
    I need to read the whole GMO paper. I'm not going to say anything about people's ability to predict. However I do manage my allocations systematically. I was a 100% invested until last week in my retirement accounts, now I'm not. One doesn't have to make 100% on/off moves, but for me taking some money off the table and trying to deploy it somewhere else or gradually putting it back in does make sense.
    Also, sometimes I keep a list of things I "want" (not "need") and if I take gains, I will go buy something. After all, that's why we invest.
    Best.
  • GMO White Paper: The S&P 500: Just Say No
    FYI: Pension Trustee Smith: I recommend to the committee that we liquidate our International
    equity assets and index our equity exposure to the S&P 500. US stocks have outperformed
    for the last 20 years, and I see no reason why that should not continue. Everyone knows
    that the US is the strongest economy and market in the world.
    This is a somewhat fictionalized version of a comment or conversation that has gone on in many
    committee discussions over the last several years in one form or another. And why wouldn’t it?
    Being a US equity investor over the past several years has felt glorious. The S&P 500 has trounced
    the competition provided by other major developed and emerging equity markets. Over the last 7
    years, the S&P is up 173% (15% annualized in nominal terms) versus MSCI EAFE (in USD terms),
    which is up 71% (8% annualized), and poor MSCI Emerging, which is up only 30% (4% annualized).
    Every dollar invested in the S&P has compounded into $2.72 versus MSCI EAFE’s $1.70 and MSCI
    Emerging’s $1.30. Diversification theoretically sounds good, but as Yogi Berra said, “In theory there
    is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.” Diversification in this particular
    instance seems good in theory but not so much in practice.
    So, shouldn’t we agree with Trustee Smith and throw in the towel, index all of our equity exposure
    to the S&P 500, and call it a day? If our goal is compounding capital for the long term, which it is,
    we would not just say “No,” but something akin to “Hell no!”
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.gmo.com/docs/default-source/research-and-commentary/strategies/asset-allocation/the-s-p-500-just-say-no.pdf
    MarketWatch Article:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/just-say-no-to-the-sp-500-and-buy-these-stocks-instead-say-gmos-strategists-2017-08-16/print