Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Reviewing Allocation Funds in a Retirement Portfolio
    @Old_Skeet...lots to ponder...longer response coming.
    @Ted, yes. They have been and should be good investments for growth going forward.
    @Derf, yes. I looked at these retirement funds as glide path funds for the 5 year increment / spending needs in retirement.
    I never pull the trigger on this idea, but it would go something like this:
    Yr/Date----Age---Hold Retirement/Income Fund
    2020 ------60----2020 Fund
    2025-------65----2025 Fund
    2030-------70----2030 Fund
    2035-------75----2035 Fund
    Etc
  • Reviewing Allocation Funds in a Retirement Portfolio
    @ bee: At one time didn't you throw out the idea to use target date funds to accomplish this in a retirement portfolio ? Ret. income, 2020, 2025, 2030.
    @ Old Skeet; You bring up a point of interest. How much to put in each pot so to speak?
    Derf
  • Reviewing Allocation Funds in a Retirement Portfolio
    One strategy that I have attempted to include as part of my portfolio review and yearly reallocation is to use "allocation funds" as the destination for other funds that need paring back. I consider these allocation funds as having attributes that served my goals well when I started investing and I now see them as serving a different goal in retirement.
    I began my investing (call this my 30's) by first owning well diversified allocation funds such as VGSTX, OAKBX, VWINX, VWELX, DODBX, PRPFX, PRWCX, and others. These funds provided me with a way to funnel small contributions into one or a few of these funds based mainly on their availability to my workplace retirement plan. It exposed "my meager, but dear savings" into what I consider a long term well managed (hopefully), well diversified investment. These funds often had a history of good risk / reward, solid management, were reasonably priced (low ER ratio) and made "staying the course" pretty certain.
    As my savings increased and my knowledge base grew (call it my 40-50's) I began realizing that I could create my own personal portfolio allocation using not only these funds, but a combination of "non-equity" funds (Bonds, RE, Commodities) and equity funds that had an "alpha/growth" strategy (sector, size, class, valuation, manager, etc.). These "fund combos" provided me with the biggest momentary losses and the largest momentary gains, but in the end have kept me up at night more often than the allocation funds I also still owned.
    I began to discipline myself to trust my fund choices to "stay the course" and use these momentary ups and downs in the market to reallocate between the "non-equity" portion and the "equity" portion of these investments, but as I reach my 60's, 70's and beyond I see myself developing a third approach.
    I see some of my low risk / low return "non-equity" funds along with some very conservation allocation funds as serving a roll in holding a portion of my portfolio for short term needs. (1-3 year, call these PONDX, PTIAX, CBUZX) for distributions of income, RMD, emergencies and retirement "fun".
    I see the higher risk / higher reward "non-equity" funds along with the higher risk / higher reward "equity" funds as serving a roll in maintaining long term growth. (10 years and longer), and I'll place my stallions here (POAGX, VGHCX, FSRPX, etc). Note to self: "I have too many of these..."
    I see my conservative, moderate & aggressive allocation funds as having a larger and key place in my retirement portfolio as the core of my holdings will occupy this space. These are investments have a (3-9 year) holding period that provide good portfolio diversification as well as "growth and income" to reallocate and "feed" ongoing (1-3 years) needs.
    The Conservative Allocation fund (3-5 year) needs in VWINX, GLRBX or CBUZX.
    The Moderate Allocation fund (5-7 year) needs in JABAX or OAKBX.
    The Aggressive Allocation fund (7-9 year) in PRWCX or BTBFX).
    Each of these allocation funds will periodically "feed" the 1-3 year funds over time.
    Each of the long term funds (10 years or more) "feed" the allocation funds.
    Hopefully there will be enough "feed" to go around.
    If you have any thought on this approach or suggestions for potential candidates for:
    1-3 year funds -
    3-5 year funds -
    5-7 year funds -
    7-9 year funds -
    10 and longer funds -
    I'd appreciate it.
  • It Would Take An ‘Immaculate Conception’ To Create Bear Market In Stocks Right Now:
    Mixing religious concepts with the tawdry business of pricing paper in the capital markets is probably not a good idea.
    Well said, Edmond. I agree. But the curious juxtaposition has at times made for some great literature.
    From Washington Irving’s The Devil and Tom Walker,
    Tom was the universal friend to the needy, and acted like "a friend in need"; that is to say, he always exacted good pay and security. In proportion to the distress of the applicant was the hardness of his terms. He accumulated bonds and mortgages, gradually squeezed his customers closer and closer, and sent them at length, dry as a sponge, from his door.
    As Tom waxed old, however, he grew thoughtful. Having secured the good things of this world, he began to feel anxious about those of the next ... He became, therefore, all of a sudden, a violent church-goer. He prayed loudly and strenuously, as if heaven were to be taken by force of lungs. Indeed, one might always tell when he had sinned most during the week by the clamor of his Sunday devotion.
  • It Would Take An ‘Immaculate Conception’ To Create Bear Market In Stocks Right Now:
    Probably Mr. Ramsey could have used a more apropos metaphor than 'immaculate conception'. Mixing religious concepts with the tawdry business of pricing paper in the capital markets is probably not a good idea. While I am not a religious person, using a term which connotes a unique miracalous event as the possible cause for a negative event (a decline in equity values), strikes me an offputting juxtaposition.
    Perhaps Mr. Ramsey might consider instead citing a "Black Swan" or "exogenous- or geopolitical-shock"...
    As to the gist of Mr. Ramsey's thoughts, I was immediately reminded of the following quote by then Yale economist Irving Fisher:
    “Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau,”
  • Buy, Sell and Ponder October 2017
    Hello,
    I was wanting to make Old_Skeet's market barometer a monthly comment feature on the board; however, I am finding, thus far, some things of weekly interest to make comment on. This past week saw the S&P 500 Index advance about +0.1% and end the week with a barometer reading of 135 putting it towards the top part of overvaluation on the barometer scale and close to an overbought reading. The barometer is indicating that staples (XLP), healthcare (XLV) and utilities (XLU) currently offer the best value form a technical score perspective. It is also interesting that staples and utilities were up 1.4% and 1.35% respectively for the week and were two of the three best performing major sectors of the 500 Index with the third being real estate (XLRE) which was up 1.9%. This week also saw earning season begin so perhaps investors were seeking cover in the traditional defensive sectors.
    In listening to some of the talking heads onTV this past week many are favoring financials from a longer term outlook and in a rising interest rate environment. It is interesting that financials (XLF) was down 0.83% for the week as earnings season began with major banks reporting.
    In addition, Morningstar's Market Valuation Graph indicates that stocks, in general, are currently at a premium now being about four to five percent overvalued.
    With this, it seems, to me from review of my barometer data feeds, money sought out value this past week over growth and foreign over domestic.
    I remain in the cash build mode within my mutual fund portfolio due to a richly priced market. According to my equity weighting matrix, which is driven by my market barometer, and used to help set my allocation in equities within my mutual fund portfolio I am now overweight equities by six percent according to the matrix. However, due to a seasonal trend calendar, I have chosen to remain overweight equities over what the matrix is currently calling for. Generally, I load equities in the fall through winter and maintain an overweight position in them through the winter months; and, come spring I usually rebalance and return to a more neutral weighting position within my asset allocation through the summer months. Come late summer I repeat the process and again begin to rebalalnce and load equities taking into account my equity weighting matrix reading. This past spring when I rebalanced and reduced by equity weighting I used the sell proceeds to move, over time, into some good yielding hybrid funds over the summer where prices are generally more favorable. This has, thus far, proved to be a good strategy move because there has been some good capital appreciation on the hybrids I purchased plus I have increased my mutual fund portfolio's yield by about ten percent along the way through this process as well.
    Currently, I have six funds on my shopping list to add to them when better valuations can be had. With this, I remain in my current cash building mode while I await the next stock market pullback. I call this investment and rebalance process throttling my asset allocation of which my barometer and equity weighting matrix as well as the calendar are key drivers in helping me determine my portfolio's equity weighting and positioning.
    So, is investing considered an art, or is it a science? I'm thinking, it is some of both.
    Have a good weekend ... and, thanks for stopping by and reading.
    Old_Skeet
  • The Cost Of Missing The Market Boom Is Skyrocketing
    Eventually, the cost of missing the market boom will be so high that the holdouts will capitulate and buy in.
    We all know what happens next. But we aren't there yet.
    What do you pay attention to so you know when the holdouts are capitulating? I'm not a fan of trying to time the market or major adjustments/bets based on those kinds of things, but I would definitely adjust at the margins, taking dividends in cash as others do or taking some gains if they're close to my targets and/or need to be rebalanced.
  • Consuelo Mack's WealthTrack: Guest: Rupal Bhansali, Ariel & Andrew Foster, Seafarer Funds
    FYI: (The Video Clip turned out to be the actual episode. I think someone at WealthTrack goofed.)
    Regards,
    Ted
    October 12, 2017
    Dear WEALTHTRACK Subscriber,
    WEALTHTRACK has been promoting the benefits of global investing since our launch in 2005. The reasons are pretty obvious. More than 95% percent of the world’s population lives outside of the United States. 76% percent of the world’s goods and services are produced in other countries.
    Yes, the U.S. economy is the largest contributor to global GDP, accounting for nearly 25% of the world’s $74 trillion economy, but others are moving up. China accounts for about 15% of global GDP, having eclipsed Japan as the world’s second largest economy several years ago. Japan’s GDP footprint is now lagging at around 6%.
    As far as future drivers of world growth, the U.S. is still a major force but other countries are growing faster. Estimates are that China will generate 35% of the world’s real economic growth, that’s excluding the effects of inflation, during the next three years. The U.S. is projected to contribute about 18% of additional growth, followed by India’s nearly 9%, the Eurozone’s 8% and surprisingly, Indonesia, the world’s fourth most populous country, is predicted to be the fifth largest driver, followed quickly by South Korea, Australia, Canada, the UK, Japan and Brazil.
    These are estimates, but you get the point. There is substantial additional economic power coming from other countries. Given these global realities should U.S. investors with their well-known and understandable home bias increase their foreign exposure? If so when and where?
    This week’s WEALTHTRACK guests are both successful global investors with a specialty in international markets. We’ll be joined by Rupal Bhansali, Chief Investment Officer of International and Global Equities for Ariel Investments. She is also Portfolio Manager of two top rated funds which she launched there in 2011. The 5-star rated Ariel International Fund is ranked in the top 10% of its Morningstar Foreign Large Value category with its over 9% annualized returns over the last five years. The 4-star rated Ariel Global Fund is in the top third of its World Large Stock category with 11% annualized returns during the same period.
    We’ll also hear from Andrew Foster, Founder, Chief Investment Officer and Lead Portfolio Manager of Seafarer Capital Partners, which he started in 2011. In 2012 he launched his flagship Seafarer Overseas Growth and Income Fund which is focused on foreign markets, especially in the developing world. It carries a Morningstar silver medalist ranking and a 4-star rating for its performance and shareholder friendly management. It is in the top 20% of its Diversified Emerging Market category with nearly seven percent annualized returns over the five- year period. Before launching Seafarer, Foster spent several years as a Portfolio Manager and Director of Research at Asia mutual fund pioneer Matthews Asia.
    I began the conversation with the question: how compelling are the investment opportunities overseas?
    As always, if you miss the show on Public Television, you can watch it at your convenience on our website. You’ll also find my weekly Action Points there, plus our guests’ “One Investment” ideas. Also, you’ll find our web exclusive EXTRA interviews with Bhansali and Foster there.
    If you would like to take WEALTHTRACK with you on your commute or travels, you can now find the WEALTHTRACK podcast on TuneIn, Stitcher, and SoundCloud, as well as iTunes. Find out more on the WEALTHTRACK Podcast page.
    Thank you for watching. Have a great weekend and make the week ahead a profitable and a productive one!
    Best Regards,
    Consuelo

    M* Snapshot AINTX:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/AINTX/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot AINTX:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/aintx
    AINTX Is Unranked In The (FLCV) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
    https://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/foreign-large-value/ariel-international-fund/aintx
    M* Snapshot AGLOX:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/AGLOX/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot AGLOX:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/aglox
    AGLOX Is Unranked In The (WS) Fund Category By U. S. News & World Report:
    https://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/world-stock/ariel-global-fund/aglox
    M* Snapshot SFGIX:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/SFGIX/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot SFGIX:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/sfgix
    SFGIX Is Unranked In The (DEM ) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
    https://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/diversified-emerging-mkts/seafarer-overseas-growth-and-income-fund/sfgix
  • Buy, Sell and Ponder October 2017
    Hi guys!
    LA port traffic has seen record imports.....July, August and now September.....with 40% of imports coming through LA. This looks good for Christmas. Also, where or at what price would you start to think about GE? Just pondering a bit....
    Also, a Fidelity update:
    Quarterly market update: fourth quarter 2017
    93% who voted found this helpful
    Key takeaways
    The global economy is experiencing a relatively steady, synchronized expansion amid low inflation, with low risk of recession.
    U.S. fiscal policy is supportive of growth, and hopes for tax-cut legislation represent a potential upside for corporate earnings.
    A shift toward tighter global monetary policy may boost market volatility, underscoring the importance of diversification.
    Each quarter, Fidelity's Asset Allocation Research Team (AART) compiles a comprehensive quarterly market update. Here is a summary of their outlook, plus key investor takeaways for the third quarter of 2017. For a deep dive into each, read the Quarterly market update: fourth quarter 2017 (PDF) or the interactive PDF.
    First, let's look at how the markets did in Q3.
    Market summary: Goldilocks backdrop persisted, widespread gains across asset markets
    The synchronized expansion in global economic activity—along with low inflation and accommodative monetary policies—continued to provide a steady backdrop for asset markets in the third quarter of 2017. Non-U.S. equities spearheaded a global stock market rally for the third quarter in a row, bolstered by a weaker dollar and a strengthened economic backdrop. Credit spreads tightened further amid the "risk-on" tone, allowing emerging-market and high-yield corporate bonds to add to their solid year-to-date gains. Steady interest rates kept high-quality bonds in the black, and all asset categories posted positive returns.
    Since equity markets hit a near-term bottom in early 2016, global assets have posted exceptional returns while experiencing remarkably low levels of volatility. Compared to historical averages, price fluctuations of riskier assets were extremely subdued, even as they registered big gains. More defensive assets such as investment-grade bonds posted smaller gains, but also experienced unusually low volatility.
    Economy/macro backdrop: Synchronized global economic upturn, but markets may be tested by monetary policy shift
    The global economy is experiencing a relatively steady, synchronized expansion. Broadly speaking, most developed economies are in more mature (mid-to-late) stages of the business cycle, with the eurozone not as far along as the United States. Recession risks remain low globally, although less accommodative policy in several countries, including China, may constrain the upside to growth going forward.
    A rebound in global trade continued to bolster the global economy. The global expansion has been underpinned by a turnaround in export-oriented sectors and manufacturing activity. China's rising import demand over the past year has helped push the percentage of major countries with expanding new export orders to more than 90%. China’s economy remains in expansion, however, policymakers' tighter stance is beginning to show an impact, and peaking activity suggests that upside to China's cyclical trajectory is limited.
    Elsewhere, the eurozone is on a cyclical upswing, enjoying a reasonably synchronized mid-cycle expansion across both its core and its periphery. The U.K., however, is confronting late-cycle pressures, as consumers’ expectations deteriorate alongside rising inflation and faltering real income growth.
    The U.S. economy remains in expansion, between the mid- and late-cycle phases. Tight labor markets are supporting wage growth and the U.S. consumer, keeping recession risk low. So far, low inflation has been the key to a prolonged mid-to-late cycle transition in the United States. U.S. inflation is likely to remain range-bound due to multiple factors: Tight labor markets, rising wages, and increasing food costs have been supportive, while slowing shelter costs and other transitory factors have served to dampen inflation. Historically, rising wages pressure profit margins and cause the Federal Reserve (Fed) to tighten monetary policy; this in turn has caused a flattening of the yield curve and raised debt-servicing costs for businesses. While many of these indicators remain relatively healthy, they have all deteriorated and are indicative of a maturing U.S. business cycle.
    U.S. fiscal policy is supportive of growth, and hopes for tax-cut legislation represent a potential upside for corporate earnings. However, tax cuts may do more to boost inflation than growth, as rate cuts tend to have a bigger impact on growth when there is a large amount of economic slack and monetary policy is easing (unlike today). Meanwhile, escalating tensions in the Korean peninsula represent a potential catalyst for meaningful market risk, as the U.S. and China are the world's 2 economies that are most central to global trade.
    Firming U.S. inflation and global growth have given the Fed confidence to continue gradually hiking its short-term policy rate; other central banks may also recognize the need to begin moving away from extraordinary easing. The Fed's unwinding of its balance sheet, and the ECB's likely tapering of asset purchases next year, could pose a liquidity challenge to markets. Overall, the global economy is in a synchronized expansion amid low inflation, with low risk of recession. Going forward, a shift toward global monetary policy normalization may boost market volatility.
    Asset markets: Non-U.S. valuations still most attractive, higher market volatility may be on the way
    The third quarter was another strong quarter for U.S. and global equity markets. Growth stocks and emerging-market categories were the strongest performers, boosted by their exposure to big gains in the information technology sector. Credit categories continued to lead gains in the bond market, and year-to-date returns were almost universally positive across major asset categories and sectors.
    Turning to fundamental factors, international corporate earnings growth has accelerated for several quarters and surpassed U.S. corporate profit growth. Earnings revisions have also stabilized for the first time in years, although lofty forward earnings growth expectations may provide a tougher hurdle to clear in the year ahead, particularly in emerging markets.
    Generally speaking, stock valuations are mixed using one-year-trailing earnings; U.S. price-to-earnings ratios are above average, developed markets are below average, and emerging markets are roughly average. Forward estimates for all markets look more reasonable. Using 5-year peak inflation-adjusted earnings, P/E ratios for foreign developed and emerging equity markets remain lower than those in the United States. Despite dollar weakness in 2017, the value of most currencies also remains in the lower half of historical ranges versus the U.S. dollar. Meanwhile, yields and credit spreads across bond sectors remained low relative to history.
    With the U.S. exhibiting the mid- and late-cycle phase dynamics, it's worth looking at the historical playbook. Historically, the mid-cycle phase of the U.S. business cycle tends to favor riskier asset classes, while late cycles have the most mixed performance of any business-cycle phase. The late-cycle phase has often featured more limited overall upside and less confidence in equity performance, though stocks have typically outperformed bonds. Inflation-resistant assets, such as commodities, energy stocks, short-duration bonds, and TIPS, have performed relatively well, as have non-U.S. equities.
    From an asset allocation standpoint, given the maturing U.S. business cycle, the likelihood of less reliable relative asset performance patterns and increased volatility as a result of the risks in the global monetary policy, smaller cyclical tilts may be warranted. The possibility of higher volatility underscores the importance of diversification.
    Long-term themes
    Slowing labor force growth and aging demographics are expected to tamp down global growth over the next 2 decades. We expect GDP growth of emerging countries to outpace that of developed markets over the long term, providing a relatively favorable secular backdrop for emerging-market equity returns. Over long periods of time, GDP growth has a tight positive relationship with long-term government bond yields (yields generally have averaged the same rate as nominal growth). We expect interest rates will rise over the long term to an average that is closer to our 3.6% nominal GDP forecast, but this implies they would settle at a significantly lower level than their historical averages.
    Next steps to consider
    Research investments
    Get industry-leading investment analysis.
    Analyze your portfolio
    Find investing ideas to match your goals.
    Invest using the cycle
    See how the cycle has impacted performance.
    God bless
    the Pudd
  • BlackRock's Fink Warns Of Risk Of Inverted Bond Yield Curve
    From the article: Despite nearly nine years of gains in U.S. stock markets, investors are flocking to bonds. ... U.S. based bond funds have brought in more than $2 for every $1 gathered by equity funds this year ... BlackRock alone reported nearly $60 billion in bond fund inflows and another $20 billion in “cash management” products that also invest in debt during the third quarter, compared to $12 billion for equity funds.
    That explains Fink’s concerns looking out a year or two. Interesting conundrum. On one hand, investors are seeking shelter from what they perceive as expensive equity markets. On the other hand, they’re avoiding cash and the short end of the curve because they yield next to nothing. As a consequence, longer bonds are pulling in money. If that continues long enough it could drive down long term rates to levels below what shorter paper yields. That’s rate inversion. Yes, it is often a precursor of recession.
    What I think is different here is that usually the inversion is brought about by central banks raising rates at the short end to choke off an overheating expansion. But in the case Fink outlines, it would be a result of investors piling into the longer end of the curve in search of yield. But investors aren’t that dumb - are they?
  • Wife's job change and her 401K
    I'm not a tax guy so please double check my understanding. It sounded like the transfer has already happened from the 401K at your wife's employer to her Roth IRA at a mutual fund company. If that's true I'm not sure how easy it is to undo it because I think it would be considered a withdrawal from a Roth without waiting what I believe is the required 5 years and that would probably incur a penalty. If the transfer isn't done yet and you still have the option to change your mind, one advantage of transferring to a rollover IRA rather than the Roth IRA is that you don't pay any tax. Depending on your situation and what you believe/want to bet on about Trump's tax plans, you might potentially pay lower tax on a Roth conversion if you waited until a new tax code is in place.
    As an addition to Bill's comments, I believe once you wait the required 5 years after converting to a Roth IRA, you're able to withdraw what you "contributed", or in other words what you've paid tax on, at any time without penalty. It's only the gains on what you contributed that you're not allowed to withdraw until retirement age without penalty.
  • Wife's job change and her 401K
    Wife worked for a large box store till May 1, 2017 and was involved in a layoff. They would not hold her 20 years of 401k investments and were required to make a distribution - so we directed the funds to in her ROTH IRA at another MF investment company with plans of paying the required taxes end of this year. Does anyone see any problems with doing this! Also the first of September she has went back to work at the same company but at a different location. Was wondering about the possibility of having the 401K funds in her ROTH IRA - plus gains transferred back to the same 401K fund administrator for the company.
    Any response or ideas would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Gary
  • Why Bitcoin’s Bubble Matters
    I've no investment in crypto-currency, though I think dabbling in it -- as a trade -- could prove very profitable. I think we are in the early, EARLY innings of this trend. IF its a bubble, I think it has a lot of room to run. It kinda feels like the internet 'bubble' circa 1994. -- speculate with a SMALL amount of capital, make a lot of money. Exit.
    At this point, I have not identified any public investments in the blockchain 'ecosphere' which strike me as meritorious.
    I would be interested in hearing any investment/trade ideas anyone has in this space...
    Anyone?
  • New Target-Date Funds Are Geared For Withdrawal Time
    Great find @Ted.
    I’m always interested in what T Rowe Price is doing. Interesting that they had a Retirement Income Fund for many years, but decided about 5 years ago to rename it Retirement Balanced.
    Now a new Retirement Income fund? Modeling its performance expectations on their current 2020 Target date fund would make it somewhat more aggressive than their previous Retirement income fund (TRRIX). In hindsight, rebranding the old fund must have been Price’s way of “clearing the deck” for this new one. Brings to mind, “What’s in a name ...”. When a company reaches the point where there are no longer enough names to go around due to their offering so many funds, what does that say? :)
    Still reading this story. Not entirely clear whether there’s a glide slope with this one - but probably not.
    (Actually, their website says there is a glide slope). I don’t understand where the firm is going with the launch of so many new funds in recent years. This one is a real puzzle (unless their goal is just to attract more and more assets). Dodge & Cox seems to do just fine with only 5 or 6 funds.
    One thing that would steer me clear of this one - In order for it to work as intended, an investor would seem to have to entrust his/her entire retirement nest egg to this fund. Diversifying into several other funds would appear to thwart the fund’s intended goal.
  • MFO Ratings Updated Through September 2017

    There are now nine equity funds at least 10 years old through September that have never incurred a negative return over any 3-year rolling period. There were only five last month. The four new funds just turned 10! They are Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX), Delaware Healthcare Fund Inst (DLHIX), Prospector Capital Appreciation Fund (PCAFX), and Prospector Opportunity Fund (POPFX).
    Four of the nine are MFO Great Owls, and David profiled PCAFX in 2011. He gave it a thumbs-up.
    Here's an update of the complete list published in this month's commentary (click image to enlarge):
    image
  • Jonathan Clements: Retirement
    FYI: If you just entered the workforce, it’s time to start preparing for retirement. Over the next four decades, you might pull in tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars every year. An October 2012 Census Bureau study estimates that those with a bachelor’s degree have average lifetime earnings of $2.4 million, figured in today’s dollars.
    Of course, it’s lucky you have all that income coming in, because ahead of you lies life’s toughest financial task: amassing enough money so you can retire in comfort. In dry economic terms, your working career is about accumulating enough financial capital, so that one day you’ll no longer need the income from your human capital. This, alas, is a task that most Americans are not good at.
    Want to do better? As you ponder how to pay for retirement, it’s helpful to think about your life in three stages—your 20s, 30s and 40s, your 50s and early 60s, and age 65 and beyond—which is how this part of the guide is divvied up.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.humbledollar.com/money-guide/retirement/
  • The Closing Bell: Wall Street Indexes Scale Fresh Record-Highs On Tech Gains
    FYI: The three main U.S. indexes climbed to fresh record-highs for the fourth day in a row on Thursday, fueled by gains in technology stocks, including Microsoft (MSFT.O) and Amazon.com (AMZN.O).
    Nine of the 11 major S&P indexes were higher, led by the information technology .SPLRCT and financial .SPSY sectors. Tech stocks, which have powered much of the recent rally, have risen about 26 percent this year.
    Regards,
    Ted
    Bloomberg:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-04/dollar-bonds-are-listless-as-oil-drops-below-50-markets-wrap
    Reuters:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/wall-street-indexes-scale-fresh-record-highs-on-tech-gains-idUSKBN1CA18I
    MarketWatch:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-stocks-set-to-hover-at-record-levels-with-fed-speakers-in-the-spotlight-2017-10-05/print
    IBD:
    http://www.investors.com/market-trend/stock-market-today/nasdaq-leads-solid-up-session-as-bull-run-continues-unabated/
    CNBC:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/05/us-stocks-sp-record-high.html
    AP:
    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FINANCIAL_MARKETS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
    Bloomberg Evening Briefing:
    https://www.bloomberg.com//news/articles/2017-10-05/your-evening-briefing
    WSJ: Markets At A Glance:
    http://markets.wsj.com/us
    SPDR's Sector Tracker:
    http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectorspdr/tools/sector-tracker
    SPDR's Bloomberg Sector Performance Pie Chart:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/sectors
    Current Futures: Positive
    https://finviz.com/futures.ashx
  • how to protect yourself if you fear new market crash coming
    Sounds sensible, if generic. But that's about as much as anyone can expect, given the topic. "Riding The Storm Out," whenever it happens, seems the best angle for me. Because my overall plan is in place, and whatever other investments (single-stocks is where I'm investigating, currently) I add to the portfolio in days to come is gravy: bought for their dividends. Capital gains would be nice, but not a requirement, for me, in October of 2017. :)