Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • How many different mutual funds and etfs do you own?
    Reply to @Accipiter: Imho, Accipiter, there are more variables, though, that you can't isolate with a simple poll like this to be able to draw conclusions on the order of what you've stated above.
    One category that will really muddy the relationship you're wanting to explore is the number of separate accounts in a household, which of course is influenced by the number of wage earners and work history. How many 401ks? IRAs? Any separate Roths vs. traditional? These numbers have a big influence on how many separate funds etc. anyone owns, particularly in 401k's and similar accounts, where the options are usually severely limited. Those variables can strongly influence the total number of positions, but aren't purely related to how active an investor someone is.
  • [Solved] new message count appears to be incorrect. Incompatible Browser
    Reply to @Accipiter: Worked fine, lasts long time!
    BTW, have given you well-deserved credit for info in new UG version, to be posted soon, I hope.
  • [Solved] new message count appears to be incorrect. Incompatible Browser
    Reply to @Accipiter: For problems with lynx try opening in new tab.
    (Sorry- couldn't resist...)
  • Report Bugs and Problems Here
    Reply to @Accipiter: Thanks. I suspected something like this.
  • How many different mutual funds and etfs do you own?
    Reply to @Accipiter: Thanks for taking the trouble to set-up this poll and also to the respondents willing to share. Also, you have explained some good reasons why the poll may be skewed a certain way. Overlooked - at least in part - is a considerable amount of "sampling bias." A couple ways that comes into play: (1) Sample Bias #1 - Those who login to MFO are more likely to be "active" investors with an above average interest in funds - and as a consequence may own a larger than normal number of funds than fund investors who don't visit the site. (2) Sample Bias #2 - MFO participants are comfortable using the Internet - not true of the total population (especially the 60+ group). We can assume a significant % also buy, trade, sell funds over the Internet. There are statistics out there showing that those who access their fund accounts via the Internet actually buy and sell funds more often than those who don't. - I'd expect that more buying and selling translates into an overall larger number of funds owned.
    Still find this poll both interesting and of value. Having done one myself before, I can appreciate the time and effort you put into it.
    Brief article about sampling bias. http://onlinestatbook.com/2/research_design/sampling.html
  • The Signin Process - and why you may have trouble with the "keep me signed in" checkbox.
    Accipiter - by chance would not having a current version of Java create a login problem? Despite doing all of the items listed above to correct the problem I was still experiencing the frustrations of multiple logins a few months ago. Once Java updated itself the problems seem to have all disappeared. It was either that or gremlins. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
  • What Mutual Fund will GAIN IF We Have a Recession?
    Well, Cathy; howdy. How does your garden grow? With silver bells and cockle shells.... Okay, away from the nursery rhymes.
    Personally, we do not and find no reason to hold any CD at this time; as the end result is almost as bad as some investments, as the "real return" is negative when factoring inflation; and worse yet if the CD's are held in a taxable account. As to recession; I do believe it is still in place.
    This would be my "convince" choice for a spouse or friend who is "itchy" about the markets:
    A plain jane TIPs fund. Yes, I see the head shakers; but:
    TIP, 3 year chart
    TIP, M* performance page
    The below article just popped up a few days ago.
    TIPs in a brave QE3 world
    TIP is representative of many managed TIPs funds; although, be aware some of these funds many also have up to a 20% exposure to corp. bonds; but generally AAA issues.
    Many of the Real Return funds have either the ability or true exposure to TIPs holdings.
    Not all TIPs active managed funds will perform in line with TIP; as managers position the holdings among duration types. Direct exposure to this area may be had via funds as:
    STPZ or LTPZ.
    TIPs, being U.S. gov't issues, of course; may provide and have proven of value when global markets as "itchy" about "things". May of 2010 and 2011 were itchy times; as well as August of 2011 with the downgrade of the U.S. credit worthiness. You may view these time periods in the 3 year chart for TIPs reactions to these events. May, 2010 through July, 2010 found about a + 2% and March, 2011 through Nov., 2011 found about a + 11%. Will there be swings? Yes, not unlike any other area. But, the price swings (for the past 4 years) won't cause one to spill their glass of wine onto the linen table cloth. :):):)
    Yes, there will be those that think one is a fool to invest in an area that has a negative yield. The negative yield comes from "demand"; which, of course, drives the price upward. Our house does not hold TIPs for the benefit of yield, but to obtain the capital appreciation from the upward price. This is the driver with many bond funds today; not just a yield. Currently, our house will take both......thank you.
    One other area of consideration, is low duration bond funds. I know there are other likely candidates; but my choice today (without further research) would be PLDDX. I note low/short duration, versus funds that may be named ultra-short bond funds; although some of these may do well, too; and may indeed have similar holdings. PLDDX also has a track record involving the 2008 market melt (- 1.6% ).
    I know you are very good at digging into choices. Do not forget the easy finder here at MFO, from the gracious Accipiter; being the drop down menu of Resources at the MFO title bar.
    Select navigator, in the "fund" box area, begin typing "inflation" and the TIPs related funds list will begin to populate. Do the same for the words "low duration" or "short duration".
    The lists may not be totally inclusive, but fine lists, regardless. Obviously, you know of other methods you have used to find fund types, by naming/investing style.
    Some of this was going to be a "Funds Boat" write, but your question finds the note here and now.
    Lastly, TIPs can't and won't fix everything for a totally sleep easy investment sector. Rising interest rates will play into this area, too. As the global economy is still broken, our house doesn't have any problem with monies in this area, today. While there are many multi-sector bond funds that one may consider as a "core bond fund", I would also currently place a TIPs fund with a decent, long term track report into this area for some of one's holdings. The above 3 year chart may not be the best that one could find; but the 50, 100 and 200 lines tell some of the story, eh? One surely could do a lot worse.
    If you choose to invest the Roth monies into TIPs, you may choose to use the TIP etf and obtain the lower E.R.
    Disclosure: Can't fully determine via M* analyze; but about 15% of our bond portfolio mix is involved in some form of TIPs.
    Gotta get back to work.
    Take care,
    Catch
  • Report Bugs and Problems Here
    Reply to @Accipiter: Thanks. It is now a dark black x as opposed to a faint bluish/grayish x before.
  • Latest Presentation From Gundlach: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall
    Reply to @Accipiter: Sorry, Accipiter, but the exact same thing happens with both Firefox and Safari:
    Simply click on "here", link fails.
    "Open with New Tab": Works fine.
  • Report Bugs and Problems Here
    Hi Accipiter. Of course you're correct with respect to the need to accurately paste a link URL, or anything (or nothing) may happen. But this whole thing started with Investor's "Here" link in the "Latest Presentation From Gundlach: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall" thread of Sept 11, below.
    Let's go there... Investor's post is up near the top.
    By the way- the above "Let's go there" link was generated according to the example which will be included in the next user guide revision:
    from the main "Discussions" page, copy link location of the desired post, then use the URL button.
    This has been tested a number of times and works just fine, but if there is a reason that this is incorrect, please let me know before I submit that revision.
  • Report Bugs and Problems Here
    Reply to @MikeM:
    Try using this link mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions
    That worked for one other person today. If it works for everyone that has trouble, Accipiter and I may have a clue to this problem.
  • Report Bugs and Problems Here
    Reply to @Accipiter: Same behavior in 5.1.7.
    Yes, 3.0.4 is 5 years old, but I don't have the problem with 2.4, which is at least a year older than that.
    Clicking the link sends me to the same "Not Found" page.
  • Are you selling, buying, or staying the course these days.
    Hi Accipiter,
    Thanks for doing the poll.
    Score me as sticking tight as I recently reduced and I am now watching being that I am at the mid point in my equity allocation at about 50%. As of Friday close I compute the Index selling on a forward price to earnings ratio at 13.3 and on a trailing price to earnings ratio at 16.0. From this, I conclude it is fully priced. Should the S&P 500 Index continue its upward march I’ll be reducing equities as they will have become overbought from my thinking. Should there be a five percent, or greater, pull back I’ll be modestly increasing my allocation in equities accordingly.
    Based upon my risk tolerance score as determined by my broker my allocation to equities ranges form forty to sixty percent. As stated above I am currently at the mid point and have room to maneuver either upward or downward based upon market valuation movement.
    I am about 20% cash, 30% income and 50% equity & other.
    Good Investing,
    Skeeter
  • How would you describe your current equity allocation?
    Reply to @Old_Joe: Hey there OJ. - Just trying to figure this new-fangled board out. Took awhile, but got a poll up & running. Thought along with Accipiter's "buying" & "selling" question, it would help also to get some sense of people's perceptions of the market now. Thanks for asking.
  • How would you describe your current equity allocation?
    Wondering how folks are positioned relative to their equity holdings. Hopefully, the five possible responses provide enough latitude. Please select the one that best describes your current equity investments compared to what you consider "normal" (given your age, situation, needs, risk tolerance, etc.). *** Note - There are 5 voting tabs on the right side of this page. Register your vote by clicking on one.
    1. Cautious - You currently have LESS in equities than normal - based on your reading of valuations, the economy, or other factors.
    2. Neutral - You currently have your NORMAL allocation to equities (within 2 or 3%)
    3. Aggressive - You currently have MORE in equities than normal - based on your reading of valuations, the economy, or other factors.
    4. Buy & Hold with rebalancing - You never vary your allocation to equities except for occasional (quarterly, semi-annual, annual) rebalancing back to whatever you deem normal.
    5. Buy & Hold - Never rebalance ("Gone Fishing" :-)
    Here's the link to another poll put up by Accipiter today - just in case you missed it. Hope the two polls serve to complement each other. (Plus I wanted to learn how to do one:-)
    http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/3965/are-you-selling-buying-or-staying-the-course-these-days-#Item_13
    Thanks in advance for your responses. FWIW - I voted "Neutral" - (but am trending towards cautious)
    #polldata
  • Are you selling, buying, or staying the course these days.
    Reply to @Accipiter: Thanks & No offense intended. Just trying to put some perspective on this. Upon retrospection, guess I'm best described as buying and selling - usually looking to tweak somewhere. Can't sit still long.
  • Are you selling, buying, or staying the course these days.
    Hi Accipiter- the forthcoming revision to the user guide will have a page on setting up Polls. I'll incorporate that hint to that material. Thanks.
    Sticking Tight, he said nervously...
    Regards- OJ