Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
For the record, Morningstar published this rebuttal to my article: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/morningstar-responds-to-david-trainer-2012-03-26?link=MW_TD
AndyJ - I am disappointed that you have lost interest. If the funds you entered did not hold (mostly) the same stocks, then they held stocks with similar ratings.
I doubt you will be surprised that the majority of funds get my Neutral rating. I mea…
AndyJ:
Thank you for your follow up.
The only way funds will get the same rating is: they hold the same stocks and charge the same fees. The tickers you entered must have been for very similar funds. Otherwise, the ratings would be different.
We d…
Catch22,
My apologies for delay in reply. It is not representative of my interest in your work.
The ratings are updated daily based on new holdings and stock prices of all holdings.
For premium features: http://www.newconstructs.com/nc/fundscreener…
Reply to @WallStreetRanter: good point, New Constructs monitors the inner workings of all the equity funds. Our ratings are based on the combined ratings of the individual stocks held by a fund.
http://www.newconstructs.com/nc/fundscreener/fund-scre…
