Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
You know what else puts this fund into perspective? The fact that it is more than 5 years old and has only attracted $273 million in assets. Maybe most people, like me, see the folly in paying a 1.26 expense ratio for a fund that routinely holds so …
A somewhat-related question on TRP Summit program. Do those of you who hold TRAIX, the institutional version of PRWCX, have any difficulties purchasing more if you hold it somewhere other than TRP — say, Fidelity, Vanguard or Schwab?
@David_Snowball, I appreciate you sharing your portfolio. One question I had is that it seems apparent you are not too concerned about investing in funds that have expense ratios north of 1 percent. For example, FPACX is very intriguing, but I have …
Giroux is great, but PRWCX was stellar before he came aboard (under Boesel, and Howard before him). I will be bummed if Giroux retires or otherwise goes away, but I don’t think this is like other key-man risk scenarios.
Like @Griffin, I am a longtime follower, but first-time poster. I felt compelled to chime in on this thread because it concerns two of my very favorite funds. I have held substantial positions in both AKRIX and EGFIX for several years and am very pl…
