FYI: Providing historical context is one of the roles we play on behalf of our clients.
And that’s a good thing, because for an investor who just began paying attention to markets in the last ten years, the extent of their context is that the S&P 500 is the only game in town worth playing, it always goes up, and dollars invested in anything else are wasted.
Looking out past this period, however, and you see that this is plainly not the truth. It’s our job to not only make sure that clients understand this, empirically, but that they’re invested in such a way so as to take advantage of the myopia of others.
Regards,
Ted
http://thereformedbroker.com/2017/05/24/what-were-telling-clients-about-european-stocks/
Comments
If the worry is that a US decline is overdue, they'll get even cheaper.
(Unless you're betting against the dollar, which really is gambling.)
One thing Josh Brown. I want to see article you published in Jan, at least Feb when you said you moved your clients assets into European stocks. Not *now* after everyone has seen the move in those stocks. Else it is what I call "using hindsight to market your genius" over the past 6 months. Seen it a long time. "How we told our clients to sell at the 2000 market top". You tell it to me few months down the road, means nothing.
In one 401k have Europacific growth. In another I have a smattering of PASDX and MALOX. At TRP I am using some TRRLX. At Scottrade I bought more OAKGX and OAKIX. I also bought more MACSX and MAPIX.
Not sure that helps. Basically I'm not married to any fund or manager who run traditional funds. In my taxable accounts, I just look once every quarter and decide where to send money. This I do to manage asset allocation. In my 401ks I'm not really doing asset allocation. You can say I'm doing trading. I have models I run that tell me how much to be invested in the markets. 0% - 100%