Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
"If there's any point in U.S. stock market history, next to the market peaks of 1929 and 2000, that has deserved a time-stamp of speculative euphoria that will be bewildering in hindsight, now is that moment."
What's the word which is the opposite of "uplifting"? That would describe this article.
It sure would have been nice to have seen the normal and customary 10% corrections more frequently over the past few years. The spring is wound very tightly.
He is perhaps not as bad as Henry van der Eb of the Mathers fund who I don't think has owned a single share of stock sine 1974!
I lost a significant amount of money with Hussman when the marker turned down in 2008 ( you would expect he would have been bullish after 2008 ) and he has kept going down
He writes brilliant pieces and has lots of reasons why stocks should drop but so far they aren't listening
Comments
It sure would have been nice to have seen the normal and customary 10% corrections more frequently over the past few years. The spring is wound very tightly.
He is perhaps not as bad as Henry van der Eb of the Mathers fund who I don't think has owned a single share of stock sine 1974!
I lost a significant amount of money with Hussman when the marker turned down in 2008 ( you would expect he would have been bullish after 2008 ) and he has kept going down
He writes brilliant pieces and has lots of reasons why stocks should drop but so far they aren't listening
While I agree things are overvalued, you don't stop a runnaway train by lying down in front of it.