Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
I'm sure there are multiple things to consider, and maybe I am a simplistic thinker, but wouldn't a company that gets to keep 85% of its earnings year after year be worth substantially more to an investor than a company that keeps 65% of its earnings? It seems obvious to me that it would be.
Exactly. A cut in the corporate tax rate is the single, most straightforward thing to increase stock prices. -- After all, at least in a theoretical sense, the market capitalization of stocks represents the discounted value of future cash flows of companies available to shareholders...
Comments
Nick de Peyster
Undervalued Stocks