What a terrible-sounding idea. I so wonder how it came about, in the name of diversification and inflation protection and whatnot.
As of a couple months ago:
https://www.fidelity.com/news/article/investing-ideas/201606210751STREETCMREALTIME_13613510 With a self-directed IRA you can direct funds beyond the market into alternative investments, such as real estate, tax liens, private company stock, partnerships, private mortgage lending, precious metals, intellectual property, foreign currency and private equity.
Comments
These are for people who want to have private offerings (usually requiring one to be an accredited investor) or other ultra-high-risk stuff in their IRAs.
For maximum flexibility (and risk, both investment and tax), people use their self-directed IRAs to buy a shell LLC that they control. It's the LLC that then makes the investments. Do a search for "checkbook control" IRA.
There are a handful of companies that serve as trustees for self-directed IRAs. Here's a writeup of checkbook control from one of them. What it doesn't tell you are the risks.
Here's an SEC page telling you about the investment risks (Ponzi schemes and such):
http://www.nasaa.org/5866/self-directed-iras-and-the-risk-of-fraud/
or pdf version: https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/sdira.pdf
Assuming people here are all "sophisticated investors" and of course would never be taken in by any of these investment schemes, a perhaps more interesting risk is the tax risk. Problems can arise through inadvertent self-dealing (which disqualifies the IRA), or by earning unrelated business taxable income (UBTI), or by missing filing requirements, or ...
Here's a Journal of Accountancy article on the tax risks: Self-directed IRAs: A tax compliance black hole
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-directed_IRA
@hank- Not sure getting up early works, either.
I'd looked into this because of a fluke event, not because of personal interest. Though I'll admit to a bit of curiosity about how the other half (whoops, 1%) lives.
I hadn't looked much into Romney's IRA - it was just so extreme that it didn't strike me as interesting even in passing. I believe @claimui is correct, though I also believe there is more to it - notably how investments, even partnership interests, can generate that much income.
Related is something that I noticed briefly not long ago. When rich folk gift minority interests in a business, they are allowed to undervalue it. It seems there's a proposal (or something more concrete, I forget) floating around now to do away with this estate/gift tax loophole. It is likely that whatever interests Romney put into his IRA were similarly undervalued.
Here's one wealth advisor's writeup about this valuation discount and possible changes to the rules:
"Discounts are commonly claimed for lack of control (minority interest discount) and lack of marketability."
https://www.cbiz.com/insights-resources/details/articleid/4298/dramatic-proposed-changes-to-impact-estate-and-gift-tax-planning-article