Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Gundlach's DoubleLine Plans To Shutter Its Equities Growth Fund

FYI: DoubleLine Capital, which oversees some $90 billion in assets, is shutting down its three-year old DoubleLine Equities Growth Fund, a spokesman said on Wednesday
Regards,
Ted
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-funds-doubleline-idUSKCN0W42TR

M* Snapshot DDEGX:
http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/DDEGX/quote.html

Comments

  • Good idea - these guys are not equity investors and with a 99% one year ranking among Large Growth caps no great loss.
  • Even better marketing idea - shut it down one month before M* gives it a 1* rating. (It would have been three years old on April Fool's day.)
  • Yet another example of survivorship bias in historical returns. Doubleline doesn't want this fund to show up in their historical performance record.
  • On a dollar-weighted basis, the impact on industry performance figures is de minimis.

    Just as I don't look at inflated (unweighted) expense ratios - 1.25% for the average fund vs. 0.71% for the average dollar (2013) - I don't pay much heed to all the noise from short-lived, scrawny funds.
    http://corporate.morningstar.com/US/documents/researchpapers/Fee_Trend.pdf

    While these petty funds don't move the industry needle, they can affect fund families' reputations that are built on high star ratings. For example, T. Rowe Price touts over 60 4 and 5 star funds.
Sign In or Register to comment.