Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

"Brandolini's Law, or the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle,"


"Brandolini's Law, or the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle," states that the energy required to refute misinformation is significantly greater than the energy needed to create and spread it. Coined by Italo Brandolini in 2013, it explains why, in digital or political debates, false claims often prevail because debunking them requires extensive time, data, and patience.

Key Aspects of Brandolini's Law:

Meaning: Lies or misinformation can be produced instantly, but refuting them requires evidence, context, and nuance.
Synonyms: The Bullshit Asymmetry Principle, The Truth-to-Bullshit Ratio.

Usage Examples:

Social Media: A user posts a false, emotionally charged claim about a health issue or a political candidate that goes viral, making it nearly impossible for experts to address every comment.

Workplace/Business: A manager presents a misleading, overly optimistic, or completely inaccurate, yet brief, interpretation of project metrics, requiring hours of analysis to disprove.

Scientific Debunking: An unscientific, one-sentence conspiracy theory, such as "the Earth is flat," requires a comprehensive, data-driven, and detailed explanation to debunk, which is far more complex than the original claim.

Context: While it feels like a universal truth, it is a heuristic (a rule of thumb) rather than a rigid scientific law, say Effectiviology."

A short (1:30 minutes) description, no CC.
You'll need to unmute.

Comments

  • No argument from me regarding any of that. Almost everything we've studied and learned about vaccines is now suspect in the blink of an eye largely due to ignorance and arrogance. On the bright side it is thinning out the idiots.
  • Spot on. Why certain posters need to be ignored, not necessarily refuted. Twain said the same with his quote about arguing with idiots. The way that I have put it previously, is that I don't want to put in the time to educate people, who choose not to educate themselves.

    Context and a total view is prerequisite to proper understanding.
  • On the bright side it is thinning out the idiots.
    Well said. That is also called natural selection.
  • Wow. He nailed it.
Sign In or Register to comment.