Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Iran's Strategy

FYI, here is a short and fairly succinct assessment of Iran's strategy from an article by Steve Erlanger in today's NYT:

Ali Vaez, the Iran director of the Brussels-based think tank International Crisis Group, said, “The Iranians want to spread the pain as much as they can, regardless of the cost to themselves and burned relations with their neighbors, hoping to create enough opposition to the war to compel President Trump to back off.”

The goals are to damage oil and gas infrastructure in neighboring countries, shut the Strait of Hormuz to shipping and curtail air traffic — all to disrupt the economies of the Persian Gulf and drive up global energy prices and inflation. “For the Islamic Republic,” he added, “survival is a victory, even if it is a pyrrhic one.”

In terms of my investment strategy, I have sold funds with a significant international component and will hold the proceeds in cash until the fog of war has cleared. As a retired investor, I prefer to err on the side of caution.

Good Luck.

Comments

  • edited March 3
    @Fred495

    Thanks for that POV.

    I wonder how much arsenal they have left in a couple weeks? Then, I suppose they switch to sabotage and terrorism. If they have deep assets in Western nations, it may be time to use those assets, too.
  • Sometimes, it doesn't take DJT all that much to back off.
  • My sense is that any investment instrument that holds a significant portion of its assets in energy dependent regions of the world (e.g., Europe) is going to be badly hit for a while. Rising inflationary pressures will be an additional obstacle.
  • Sometimes, it doesn't take DJT all that much to back off.

    Donnie just said he's ordering the Intl Finance Development Corp to offer political risk insurance and financial guarantees to 'ALL Maritime Trade' and says the US will start escorting ships in the Strait if needed.

    The financial costs to the American taxpayer keep going up in Donnie's little Iran adventure-cum-war-of-choice.
  • rforno said:

    Sometimes, it doesn't take DJT all that much to back off.

    Donnie just said he's ordering the Intl Finance Development Corp to offer political risk insurance and financial guarantees to 'ALL Maritime Trade' and says the US will start escorting ships in the Strait if needed.

    The financial costs to the American taxpayer keep going up in Donnie's little Iran adventure-cum-war-of-choice.
    That cheered up Mr. Market, but I suspect that the tanker owners and operators are noticing we can't keep our installations on land from being hit.
  • edited March 3
    My guess is that Donald J. Trump will stop boasting about cheaper gasoline and oil.
    There will be no more talk about "$2.00/gallon" gas!

  • --- The benchmark freight rate for Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) — used to ship 2 million barrels of oil from the Middle East to China — hit an all-time high of $423,736 per day on Monday, data from LSEG showed. That marked an increase of more than 94% from Friday’s close.

    Crude oil tanker insurance cost, Middle East to China report/article this morning.
  • My guess is that Donald J. Trump will stop boasting about cheaper gasoline and oil.
    There will be no more talk about "$2.00/gallon" gas!

    Or he will simply claim it is "cheaper than ever".

  • edited March 3
    Or he will simply claim it is "cheaper than ever".

    Nah- not his style:

    UNLIKE the PITIFUL PERFORMANCE of the Previous BIDEN administration I HAVE NOW CAUSED GASOLINE AND FUEL PRICES to be the VERY LOWEST since the Beginning of this GREAT COUNTRY.

    SEE- It SAYS THAT right here on this genuine SOLID GOLD plated TROPHY rewarded to ME by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF OIL BILLIONAIRES!
  • edited March 3
    Don't look now, but we've also got new special forces boots in the ground in Ecuador helping the local attack drug cartels....
  • edited 9:10AM
    A bug has invaded my brain for a few days so, this morning, I decided to ask Google AI for a quick description. Forgive me for sharing an AI response but it aligns with what I thought I remembered from high school. My question was "How did the first world war start?". The response from AI:
    World War I began on July 28, 1914, sparked by the assassination of Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist on June 28, 1914. This event triggered a rapid, domino-effect mobilization of pre-existing, rigid alliances (Triple Entente vs. Triple Alliance), converting a regional conflict into a global war.

    Key Factors Leading to the Conflict:
    The Assassination: Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb, assassinated the Archduke to break off Austria-Hungary's South Slav provinces.
    The "Blank Check": Germany promised unwavering support to Austria-Hungary, encouraging a hardline stance against Serbia.
    Alliance System: The tangled web of alliances meant Russia defended Serbia, Germany defended Austria-Hungary, and France/Britain were drawn in to support Russia.
    Long-Term Tensions: Intense militarism, colonial imperialism, and aggressive nationalism created an unstable European atmosphere.

    Following the assassination, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, prompting Russia to mobilize, which triggered Germany's declaration of war on Russia and France, leading to the invasion of Belgium and Britain's entry.
    So, a country (Israel?) set up an assignation (Khamenei?). Other counties, through alliances got drug in (U.S., many other middle east countries, some NATO? (almost)). I hope I am just paranoid.

  • @Anna, I am of the firm belief that Netanyahoo! (and the Saudis, to a lesser extent) played Donnie like a fiddle, getting the US to be his proxy and Big Gun(tm) for the Iran attack. Now that the whole Middle East is fighting amongst itself and occupying public attention, Netanyahoo! can focus on his interests -- Gaza, Lebanon, and ensuring Israeli primacy in the region. Frankly I think Israel has been the most destabilizing power in the region for decades, but that's just my take.

    Both Israel and Saudi Arabia had the most to gain by a crippled Iran. Sure, Iran was a perennial US concern, but certainly not an 'imminent' one as we've been led to believe.

    We're seeing NATO mobilizing in the Med, missiles landing in countries we'd never think of, and the Strait is closed....all within 5 days. Mixed messaging and flat-out lies from Washington make this an even more convoluted and debilitating situation both here and abroad.

    Ergo, I'm reminded of ADM Painter in 'The Hunt for Red October' ....

    https://clip.cafe/the-hunt-red-october-1990/this-business-will-get-out-of-control/





  • "Useful idiot" for other ruthless authoritarians captures Dump pretty well.
  • Just pray our supply of missiles holds out until Xi decides to strike
  • edited 3:00PM
    sma3 said:

    Just pray our supply of missiles holds out until Xi decides to strike

    "U.S. Army and Air Force vice chiefs who testified during a a Senate Armed Services subcommittee
    Wednesday could not give a good estimate on the status of their munitions. 'Right now, we don't have,
    you know, a good estimate on what is being clearly burned,' said Gen. Christopher LaNeve,
    vice chief of staff of the U.S. Army testified.

    "'It's a little too early to tell exactly what kind of impact it's going to have, just based on where we are
    in the conflict, but we'll absolutely commit to working with your team to provide details on munitions
    inventories as we go forward,' Gen. John D. Lamontagne, vice chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force, said."

    "The U.S. was already concerned about its stockpile before this war as the Russian-Ukraine conflict,
    the Israeli-Gaza conflict and last summer's conflict with Iran have dramatically increased demand for
    Patriot and THAAD missiles, according to Greico."

    "Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missiles that are used to intercept Iran's most powerful ballistic missiles
    are in particularly short supply. Grieco estimated that if the U.S. uses its THAAD missiles at same rate as the
    12-day conflict with Iran last year, it might only have enough for about two weeks."

    https://abcnews.com/Politics/war-iran-stretches-experts-raise-concerns-war-attrition/story?id=130719578
  • edited 3:30PM
    Excerpt From “The Dangerous Munitions Mismatch Between America and Iran”.

    “This is not idle speculation: The Department of Defense has warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping is preparing his military to be ready to successfully invade Taiwan by 2027. In pursuit of this goal, China has doubled its inventory of ballistic-missile launchers and almost tripled its number of missiles available since 2020. American and Japanese forces throughout the region will be subject to attack if the United States chooses to defend Taiwan. China will be keeping close tabs on U.S. munitions expenditures as it calculates whether (and if so, when) it will have enough of an advantage to assure victory. The war in Iran is likely advancing that timeline and increasing the odds that China will invade.
    The draining of U.S. missile stockpiles poses a serious problem for national security. In choosing this conflict with Iran, the United States privileged likely ephemeral gains against an adversary that was a marginal threat over deterrence of peer and near-peer adversaries that have the will and the means to profoundly endanger global stability.
    https://theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/us-iran-war-air-strikes/686228/

    The first week of campaign used 25% of the stockpile already. This approach is NOT sustainable. This explains the lack of air defense, Patriot missiles cost several millions versus Iranian drones that cost $50K.
  • More and more THAAD and Patriot assets are being moved into the Middle East ... China must be *thrilled* by this excellent military planning.

    BTW there might not be so many Iranian drones flying right now if Donnie had given Zelenskyy the Tomahawks he wanted to take out the Russian drone factories. So now the US is spending $2M to down a $20,000 drone ... which sounds like typical financial wizardry for a Trump operation. (Besides, it's not 'his' money to waste, anyway.)


  • I just discovered Amazon that is having massive cyber problems that are being attributed to Iran hackers and destroyed data centers in the middle east. I tried to put through a small buy at Amazon and, indeed, the buy step errored out. This is what is being reported in more than just the US (e.g. UK).
  • edited 4:39PM
    The cost of the war in Iran is estimated at $1 billion per day.
    This war of choice will likely increase our already large fiscal deficit.

    https://x.com/nancyayoussef/status/2029260834564604070
  • Fred Thompson. Someone to respect and admire, and from Tennessee!!! Republican, not Repugnant. Did he not serve on Sam Ervin's Watergate Committee?
    The Hunt For Red October.
    https://clip.cafe/the-hunt-red-october-1990/this-business-will-get-out-of-control/
    Admiral Painter. "The Ruskies don't take a dump without a PLAN."
  • AndyJ said:

    "Useful idiot" for other ruthless authoritarians captures Dump pretty well.

    Russian asset, dontcha know...
  • edited 4:49PM
    Two kinds of missiles are in hot demand on the battlefield. Interceptors, such as Patriot missiles, are designed to shoot down other missiles and drones. Offensive weapons, such as Tomahawk cruise missiles, are meant to destroy targets on the ground. Both are in short supply, but the situation with interceptors is particularly dire.
    https://theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/us-iran-war-air-strikes/686228/

    Strother Martin:
    "Morons. I've got morons on my team."

  • "Buy your War Bonds at this theater, or wherever you do your banking."

    We'll just add to the $7.5T federal debt. For a war of choice.
  • An entire cesspool of morons.
  • edited 6:45PM
    Recent industry and analyst estimates indicate that roughly one‑quarter to about one‑third of the
    world’s traded nitrogen fertilizers (including ammonia and urea) pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
    Iran's closure of the strait will increase fertilizer prices which often leads to lower crop yields
    and higher food costs.
  • That stable genius does not see all these connections and their impact on the global economy. Think @rforno is spot on that Trump got played by Netanyahoo! (and the Saudis, to a lesser extent) to start this war.

    By the way, top Pentagon officials ( not Hegseth) do not think Iran’s missile program has advanced enough to pose treat to the west.
Sign In or Register to comment.