It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/62165The HI trust fund is used to pay for benefits under Medicare Part A, which covers inpatient hospital services, care provided in skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and hospice care. The fund derives its income from several sources.
...
We estimate that the HI trust fund's balance is exhausted in 2040. The balance generally increases through 2031, but spending begins to outstrip income in the following year.
...
If the balance of the fund was exhausted and the fund's spending continued to outstrip its income, total payments to health plans and providers for services covered under Part A would be limited by law to the amount of income credited to the fund. Total benefits would need to be reduced (in relation to the amounts in our baseline projections) by an amount that rises from 8 percent in 2040 to 10 percent in 2056, we estimate.
...
To eliminate the actuarial deficit, lawmakers would need to take action. They could increase taxes, reduce payments, transfer money to the trust fund, or take some combination of those approaches.
...
The year in which the HI trust fund's balance is exhausted in our current projections, 2040, is 12 years earlier than in our most recent estimate of that date, which was published in March 2025. ...
Our projections of income to the HI trust fund are less this year than last year for three main reasons:
- First, revenues from taxing Social Security benefits are smaller in the current projections because of changes put in place by the 2025 reconciliation act (Public Law 119-21), which lowered tax rates and created a temporary deduction for taxpayers age 65 or older.
- Second, we decreased our projections of revenues from payroll taxes to account for projections of lower earnings.
- Finally, we now project interest income credited to the trust fund to be smaller than estimated last year because of the smaller trust fund balances in this year's projections.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla
Comments
One year before Obama care I priced the premiums. For my wife and me together, they were $400 monthly and $3500 deductible. They are now at $1200 per person (this is 6 times more) with an $8-10K deductible.
That means about $29K out of pocket before seeing any doctor. We are both on Medicare.
Many who already have these benefits, want to keep theirs, but do away with everybody else's. Typical greedy self-absorbed people who always take, but never give. Meanwhile they keep their supporters on board by blaming anything/everything but themselves.
When you point out a problem, they point fingers elsewhere. Why nothing important ever gets addressed in this country.
In nominal (not inflation adjusted) dollars, total national expenditures on health care have risen from $3T in 2014 to $4.87T in 2023. That's 1.62 times as much or 62% more .
Implementation of the ACA started in 2010, though ACA plans were not offered until 2014. So to remove all impact of the ACA, we can compare 2014-2023 with the decade before 2010. In nominal dollars, total health care expenditures rose from $1.37T in 2000 to $2.49T in 2009. That's 1.82 times as much, or 82% more.
https://www.kff.org/health-costs/health-policy-101-health-care-costs-and-affordability/ (Figure 1)
If one wants to look at how these costs are allocated - between the government (taxpayers), employers, and individuals, that's a different question, one that's more complex. In 2026, the government share was reduced (many subsidies eliminated). This had devastating effects on some people. https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/mapping-the-uneven-burden-of-rising-aca-marketplace-premium-payments-due-to-enhanced-tax-credit-expiration/
We don't need to deal with abstractions. We can look at real people paying real money on real plans. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/24/aca-enhanced-subsidy-expiration-effects.html
Thanks @msf
The Linder's example is pretty stark. This administration has burned a lot of people on ACA, including their own supporters. "Thank you, Sir, Can I have another", seems to be their mantra.
Another relevant point is that many red states refused Medicaid expansion, burning their residents pretty badly with that. People in those locales have fewer, more expensive options.
So this administration talk about TrumpCare to replace ACA last year and it died. Talking about the quality of life and affordability !
A freaking decade later, and another promise unfulfilled. The maga faithful duped by the promise of affordability, every single time! Health care for many millions is demonstrably worse, since GOP took an ax to the ACA. And government spending certainly hasn't gone down, as a result.
The Medicare Part B premium is $203/month while there is no premium for Part A for most people. The annual deductible for Medicare Part B is $283.
The maga faithful duped by the promise of affordability, every single time!
Health care for many millions is demonstrably worse, since GOP took an ax to the ACA."
How can so many people be fooled so many times?
This irrational behavior is certainly puzzling.