Private-equity wants a slice of your 401k and it’s counting on some help from Trump Administration. The wrappers being considered are OEFs, CITs, interval-funds (IFs; buy anytime, but redemptions are limited). The TDFs can invest 5-10% in alternatives including private-equity/credit, but most plans don’t even do that fearing possible troubles with ERISA. High fees are another problem that may attract class action lawsuits. To address illiquidity, some firms have partnered with liquidity-providers. The 401k plans with brokerage windows shift all risks to the plan participants, but then why not just buy private-equity/credit giants APO, KKR, BX, BLK, etc.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/retirement-401k-private-equity-62be9228?refsec=mutual-funds&mod=topics_mutual-funds
Comments
But they can't resist getting their grubby paws on the trillions in pensions/retirement accounts...
You know how defined benefit plans were phased out by companies (encouraging employees to get into 401(k) which helped the stock market) and now the last DB plan like is social security. If private equity and private credit wants to gain more market share, they really need to work on the US government phasing out social security, which should really motivate more people to get into private equity and private credit. Pure demand and supply.
I would watch the Bigs (APO, KKR, BX, BLK (new), etc.)' for how and to what extent they bifurcate burdens from benefits using public markets which would give us an indication of the systemic risks they would create while the Fed and US government is focused on the last war culprits (banks).
lobbyists not needed, and will be faster\cheaper by giving trump & cronies their cut directly.
They are illiquid and difficult to properly value.
Furthermore, PE is often riskier and considerably more expensive than public markets.
While some PE funds have generated excellent long-term results,
there is wide dispersion between best-in-class funds and average funds.
Pull quote: Yet another Minsky Moment?
https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bstqfcskz9o72ospzlds/opinion/why-does-private-equity-get-to-play-make-believe-with-prices
(LinkedIn links are open - just close the Login/Signup screen)
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ericbalchunas_interesting-vanguard-held-discussions-with-activity-7311027525424431104-qiHw?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAFjCY6wBccxAhzfDGLCwSkfGL97DN413bHU&utm_campaign=copy_link
PE is generally offer to high net worth clients well in excess of $1M.
PE is generally offer to high net worth clients well in excess of $1M. Not sure how it fits in 401(K) plan.
He came from BlackRock/BLK. Vanguard may want to be a low-cost disruptor in private-equity. Larry Fink/BLK wants to bring private-equity to the masses. Looks to be a dream combo.
Not a sure thing. Remember that at one time, Vanguard wanted to be a low-cost disruptor in the annuities world, but it gave up only after a few years. And a few more years later, it dumped the entire variable-annuity business on Transamerica, retaining only the VA fund management.
Ramji is now in India to review a new tech development center in India although it doesn't offer any funds within India.
Critical for Vanguard will be to improve its customer service and quit the M-F 8-8 support operations. But we haven't seen any announcements for those.
This may not be your grandfather's Vanguard, or even Bogle's Vanguard.
Clients must have $5 million in Vanguard assets, in addition to meeting qualified purchaser
and accredited investor regulatory standards¹.
I assume Vanguard seeks a PE strategy accessible to a larger segment of the investor population.
https://investor.vanguard.com/wealth-management/private-equity
¹ Clients must meet the qualified purchaser and accredited investor standards under federal law,
typically showing that their net worth is over $1 million or their annual income has been more than
$200,000 in the last two years.
Short 7+min Video
Thanks for the video!