Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

How to Pay Next-to-Nothing in Taxes During Retirement

beebee
edited January 12 in Other Investing
From The article:
For 2024, individuals with taxable income below $47,025 ($94,050 for married couples) pay 0% tax for long-term capital gains (LTCG). In years when you’re under the threshold you could effectively lock in tax-free long-term gains. The idea would be to realize just enough LTCG to stay within the 0% tax bracket. You also have to tack on the standard deduction which is $15,000 for individuals or $30,000 for a married couple. That means don’t have to pay federal income taxes on your long-term capital gains until your income exceeds a little more than $63,000 (single) or $126,000 (married couple). So you could realize more than $63,000 ($126,000) in capital gains and dividends without paying any federal income tax.
image

Link to Article:
https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2025/01/how-to-pay-nothing-in-taxes-during-retirement/



Comments

  • msf
    edited January 12
    I'm playing this game by bundling cap gains into some years and ordinary income into others.

    A few techniques to bundle ordinary income

    - Do Roth conversions in "ordinary income years".
    - Buy short term (1 year or less) CDs/T-bills in "cap gains years" that mature in "ordinary income years"
    - Invest in muni (MM, bond) funds in "cap gains years", and taxable (Treasury, corporate) funds in "ordinary income years"

    A couple of techniques to bundle cap gains

    - Accelerate recognition of gains (sell and repurchase if desired) in "cap gains years"
    - Sell "around" annual distributions - avoid distributions of ordinary income (if any) and repurchase after record date (recognizes additional cap gains)

    Depending on how much space you have in your 0% cap gains bracket, creating more cap gains may or may not work out for you. In any case, the added cap gains are state-taxable, so that should be kept in mind as well.

    On the flip side, Roth conversions may be partially or fully state tax-exempt, depending on the state. That's motivation to convert some money even if it eats into the 0% cap gains bracket.

    Note that the numbers presented in the graph are incorrect.

    Cap gains: $47,025 (top of 0% bracket) + $14,600 (std ded.) = $61,625, not $63,475
    Ordinary inc: $47,150 (top of 12% bracket) + $14,600 (std ded.) = $61,750, not $63,475

    Note also that the cap gains bracket does not line up exactly with the ordinary income bracket (as given by the IRS). Close, but different.

    It looks like the author may have been adding in the 2023 extra deduction ($1,850) for being over age 65 (or blind). That would make the cap gains figure come out to $63,475.
  • beebee
    edited January 14
    msf said:

    I'm playing this game by bundling cap gains into some years and ordinary income into others.

    A few techniques to bundle ordinary income

    - Do Roth conversions in "ordinary income years".
    - Buy short term (1 year or less) CDs/T-bills in "cap gains years" that mature in "ordinary income years"
    - Invest in muni (MM, bond) funds in "cap gains years", and taxable (Treasury, corporate) funds in "ordinary income years"

    A couple of techniques to bundle cap gains

    - Accelerate recognition of gains (sell and repurchase if desired) in "cap gains years"
    - Sell "around" annual distributions - avoid distributions of ordinary income (if any) and repurchase after record date (recognizes additional cap gains)

    Depending on how much space you have in your 0% cap gains bracket, creating more cap gains may or may not work out for you. In any case, the added cap gains are state-taxable, so that should be kept in mind as well.

    On the flip side, Roth conversions may be partially or fully state tax-exempt, depending on the state. That's motivation to convert some money even if it eats into the 0% cap gains bracket.

    Note that the numbers presented in the graph are incorrect.

    Cap gains: $47,025 (top of 0% bracket) + $14,600 (std ded.) = $61,625, not $63,475
    Ordinary inc: $47,150 (top of 12% bracket) + $14,600 (std ded.) = $61,750, not $63,475

    Note also that the cap gains bracket does not line up exactly with the ordinary income bracket (as given by the IRS). Close, but different.

    It looks like the author may have been adding in the 2023 extra deduction ($1,850) for being over age 65 (or blind). That would make the cap gains figure come out to $63,475.

    Thanks @msf, I am still digesting what you wrote. Wondering if RMDs could be worked into this "Capital Gains Year" strategy where by:

    RMDs are taking as early as possible to potentially provide a LT capital gain (from the RMD WD date + 1 year) AKA "Capital Gains Years". Conversely, In years where these RMDs suffered a loss, one would sell (by Dec 31st of that year) to harvest a tax loss which would help offset future gains in "Capital Gains Years".


  • edited January 14
    Next to nothing? Why stop there? For us, it's been nothing.

    Not to beat a dead horse, but as a retired bean counter I've posted many times that tax planning is, or should be, a lifelong process.

    When we started our professional careers in 1980 we adopted our "Avoid, Delay, Minimize" tax plan and have executed it with relentless precision. We prefer to pay our income taxes on our own schedule.

    Result? We have not paid a dime in FIT/SIT since the year after our retirements in 2012, and will likely continue to choose to pay ZERO until RMDs are required at Age 73, a tax-free period of 16 years.

    Some cool features of the strategy are ZERO taxes on otherwise taxable Cap Gains, SS and pensions, and (effectively) annual tax-free withdrawals from IRAs up to the taxable threshold. We choose to take the cash in lieu of Roth conversions to fund our smallish, annual income gap.

    There are three phases to an investor's life: Accumulation, Maintenance and Disbursement. Our lifelong tax strategy and retirement investment strategy have allowed our portfolio to continue to grow significantly annually and we remain in the Accumulation phase.
  • @stillers,

    Please indulges us with your "pay no tax" strategies.

    With your RMDs being 16 years away and retirement starting in 2012 or at age 45, I am all ears.

    Congratulations.
  • edited January 14
    I took a somewhat different approach. I converted quite a bit to Roth while staying in the lowest tax bracket. Yes, I paid some taxes but the Roth grows tax free forever. The earnings/growth on the funds I converted many moons ago (retired 17+ years) more than make up any taxes I've paid and are still growing tax free forever (if they don't change the Roth laws ). Who knows which way is best as I'm not going to do all that math. Let's just say they both work out exactly the same and call it a day. As they say: "there are more than one way to skin the cat."
  • @bee
    RMDs are taking as early as possible to potentially provide a LT capital gain (from the RMD WD date + 1 year) AKA "Capital Gains Years". Conversely, In years where these RMDs suffered a loss, one would sell (by Dec 31st of that year) to harvest a tax loss which would help offset future gains in "Capital Gains Years".

    I don't believe TLH is legal in IRA. Maybe I'm missing the boat?
  • edited January 14
    Are you ( stillers )& the wife working PT for cash?
  • @Derf, those would be well out of +/- 30 day wash sale window.

    I no longer take RMDs early after I got burned in 2020.
  • @yogibearbull Could you provide how you got burned? I think I understand bees First part, but not the TLH.
  • I was taking RMD on Jan 2 or 3. But in 2020, the pandemic year, the RMDs were waived - first for those who took it after February or March, and finally for all around mid-2020. So, I was kicking myself for 5-6 months in 2020 for taking RMDs too early. Now I take them in mid/late-year.
  • @yogibearbull Now that you mentioned your burn, I think I had half of a burn. One account RMD early, & waived the other account.
  • beebee
    edited January 14
    Derf said:

    ... I think I understand bees First part, but not the TLH.

    TLH would occur if one took RMDs (in kind) early (these holdings became taxable) and then there was a market swoon causing the "taxable RMDs" to incur a loss. I hope I am thinking this through correctly. Obviously the rest of your taxable investments would also be potentially available for TLH as well.
  • I was taking RMD on Jan 2 or 3. But in 2020, the pandemic year, the RMDs were waived - first for those who took it after February or March, and finally for all around mid-2020. So, I was kicking myself for 5-6 months in 2020 for taking RMDs too early. Now I take them in mid/late-year.

    Different strokes for different folks.

    We plan on making QCDs when we're finally subject to RMDs. So had we been subject to RMDs by 2020, we would not have been very upset at having taken a distribution that wasn't required. The money would have gone to some good causes (at least we think so).

    We make partial Roth conversions annually. Since those are generally best done early in the year, and since they cannot be done prior to taking RMDs, we plan on taking RMDs (for QCDs) early each year.

    In 2009, RMDs were also waived. But this was announced at the end of 2008. So there was no confusion about what to do with 2009 RMDs already taken. Only two waivers in 50 years (RMDs started in 1974 with ERISA), and only one of those without advance warning. Those are pretty good odds of it not happening again in our lifetimes.
  • @bee Thanks for explanation , I see where you're coming from.
Sign In or Register to comment.