Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Reply to @Derf: The poster who refers to "the crooked actively managed firms" must have had a rotten experience somewhere along the way, and/or got an A+ on the Bogleheads entrance exam.
I'll be mildly interested to see how the V equity group runs that fund.
"Why do investor shares of this actively managed Global Minimum Volatility Fund have a lower expense ratio than investor shares of Vanguard’s Total World Stock INDEX fund?" Couldn't have said it better if I'd looked up the costs myself, (And I only got a C+ on the exam).
I still suspect that a long term investment in the total world stock index will pay out over 20 years, so that's my next choice for my son's IRA.
Comments
Stay warm, Derf
I'll be mildly interested to see how the V equity group runs that fund.
Couldn't have said it better if I'd looked up the costs myself, (And I only got a C+ on the exam).
I still suspect that a long term investment in the total world stock index will pay out over 20 years, so that's my next choice for my son's IRA.