Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Whitebox 2Q Results and Commentary...Just Received

edited August 2013 in Fund Discussions
Here are links to updated fact-sheets for Whitebox Tactical Fund WBMIX and Long-Short WBLFX.

Here's link 2Q Commentary.

Quick notes: The Great Rotation Begins. Premature accumulation of gold miners, but holding on because under-valued. Short Apartment REITs. Long Financials and Specialty Financials. Short Fixed Income. Long Quality Blue Chip. Short Consumer Staples. Long-Cap Over Small-Cap. Long Airlines and Automotive. Use of straddles as hedge against volatility.

Intriguing, as always. And, I appreciate their articulation of good/bad past performance and of strategy and positioning going forward.

And, from fact-sheet: Interesting that WBMIX now using long-short peer group, if not formal benchmark.

Here's look at YTD performance using M* chart:

image

Not bad.

BTW. Not a peep yet on 2Q performance from AQR.

How does WBMIX compare with AQRIX, or another favorite, ARLSX YTD?

image

Comments

  • Updated to reflect 2Q Commentary.
  • What does wbmix do that splv doesn't?

    image
  • Reply to @ron: Two entirely different funds. One is a long-short fund that can go long/short both equities and fixed income. The other is a long-only fund.
  • edited August 2013
    Reply to @ron: I like SPLV. But I'd say WBMIX is better hedged against downside. SPLV is a bit young to experience...and so is WBMIX for that matter. Thoughts?

    image
  • edited August 2013
    Reply to @Charles: "But I'd say WBMIX is better hedged against downside" SPLV does not do any hedging.
  • Reply to @scott: Yes! Hear Scott.
  • Reply to @Charles: They're both fine choices, but different from a risk perspective and otherwise.
Sign In or Register to comment.