The idea of the 60 stock / 40 bond portfolio seems to be very dated (although, I still believe this is a good mix for most people). Critics of this idea tend to focus on the following themes: 1) A stock and bond portfolio is not very diversified. It should include commodities and real estate as well. 2) Asset mix should be customized to the individual's financial needs. For example, a retiree should have more bonds than stocks. And as the average lifespan increases, the typical holdings of stocks should be higher than 60%. 3) Bonds are just overpriced right now. Why would you want to own an overpriced asset.
Today's article in Learn Bonds's is
http://www.learnbonds.com/how-expensive-are-bonds-relative-to-stocks-now/
Comments
Age
Near Cash
Fixed Income
Risk Assets
20-45
1%
0%
99%
45-55
1%
9%
90%
55-Retired
5%
15%
80%
Retired
5%
20-30%
75-65%
But AQRIX employs its own dynamic allocation strategy - it's supposed to anyway, so I don't want to mess with it. In different ways, so do my other top fund holdings: WBMIX and FAAFX. The strategies used with these three appeal to me and I'm impressed with their managers (Asness, Redleaf, and Berkowitz).
I am applying the trend following method with the more passive DODGX - DODIX pair, as posted previously. Ditto with BOND - Cash. Doing well so far...my thanks to Flack and Faber.
As for the lag, I already drive myself crazy at 10-mo, so I've been resisting temptation to shorten-up. But I'm curious about other indicators, if you'd like to share.
Thanks man.
age early 40s. ~25+ yrs until retirement; 401K/tsp ~85s% stocks:15s% bonds. but buying bonds in my private account YTM ~ average 7%...approximately 60s% stocks 40s% bonds in private account
you may need to define and come up w/ a plan/goals for yourself before deciding these factors