But about two years ago, bank loans began to include "Libor floors," or minimum levels at which their income payments begin ratcheting upward if interest rates rise. According to Robert Polenberg of Standard & Poor's Leveraged Commentary & Data, 40% of existing bank loans have Libor floors, with the level averaging 1.59%. Virtually 100% of newly issued loans, says Mr. Polenberg, include them.
David Allison of Allison Investment Management in Columbia, S.C., points out that charts of past performance showing these funds performing well when rates went up are based on periods before Libor floors were common.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304453304576391900432920670.html#printMode
Comments
Thank you for your time with this and the posting.
I continue to look at LIBOR on a casual basis of once a week; and I also watch Euribor, too.
Since the large intervention of Federal monies after the market melt, LIBOR has remained in a very tight range.
Take care,
Catch
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1992-02-02/business/1992033087_1_adjustable-rate-adjustable-rate-funds
(1992 article talking about the adjustment lag)
http://articles.sfgate.com/1995-03-20/business/17800348_1_government-fund-mutual-fund-fund-s-assets
(1995 article about T. Rowe Price changing the mandate of its ARM fund, and giving ARM market returns for 1992-1994 - the last year being 0.01%)
So repositioned bond holdings accordingly earlier in the year including Fidelity's shortest term munifund when they sold off. Count me a head-scratching bond bear
with 70% of assets decidedly not stocks and now decidely not exactly bonds either.
Someone has to be targeted to pay for this mess and is, with low risk yields around zero dot zero.