Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
SGENX is a front-end load mutual fund which may be load-waived on certain brokerage platforms (e.g., Fidelity). Fidelity lists two sets of trailing returns for SGENX—one set is labeled load-adjusted. When I cross-checked the returns on M*, there were no adjustments made for the 5% front-end load. Does M* usually ignore the impact of front-end and/or back-end loads on a mutual fund's trailing returns?
From Gemini (nor clear with Morningstar legal definitions)
The load-adjusted returns are not the default display on the main Morningstar site. Morningstar publishes load-adjusted returns in specific premium data points and reports, which are often utilized by financial professionals and integrated into third-party brokerage platforms like Charles Schwab and Fidelity.
However, Morningstar Rating Morningstar rates mutual funds from one to five stars based on how well they've performed (after adjusting for risk and accounting for sales charges) in comparison to similar funds.
This is similar to what you find in prospectuses. They have a table of 1/5/10 year returns with and w/o loads, but all other data - calendar year returns, financials - exclude loads.
The impact of a load diminishes, or doesn't, over time depending on how you look at it.
If you buy a fund with a 5% load like SGENX, then the value of your investment will always be 100/105, or about 95.2% as much as it would have been without the load. A 4.8% reduction in value. No matter how many years you hold the investment.
(Though if you sell after just one year, there's an added 1% deferred sales charge, so your investment value is actually reduced to 100/105 x 99/100 = 99/105 or about 94.3% of what it would have been without the loads.)
On the other hand, viewed in terms of (geometric) average annual returns, a 5% load diminishes annual returns by (100/105) ^ (1/number of years).
So over 1 year, the average annual return is multiplied by 95.2% (ignoring backend load). The annual return is reduced by about 4.8%.
While over 5 years, the average annual return is multiplied by (100/105) ^ (1/5) or 99.0%. Annual returns are reduced by about a percent. Because that reduction takes place each year, after five years (and compounding) that adds up to the same 4.8% reduction in final value.
Hi there. Others have already covered it, I think, but for avoidance of doubt: We ordinarily present total returns (not load adjusted). Also, we revised the Star Rating methodology some years ago to remove the load adjustment from the calculation. As such, it's not present there, either.
To my knowledge, the only return figures we display that are load-adjusted by default are post-tax returns (as I believe the SEC stipulates that calc be load adjusted, if I'm not mistaken).
Comments
The load-adjusted returns are not the default display on the main Morningstar site. Morningstar publishes load-adjusted returns in specific premium data points and reports, which are often utilized by financial professionals and integrated into third-party brokerage platforms like Charles Schwab and Fidelity.
However, Morningstar Rating
Morningstar rates mutual funds from one to five stars based on how well they've performed (after adjusting for risk and accounting for sales charges) in comparison to similar funds.
https://advisor.morningstar.com/Enterprise/VTC/MutualFundComprehensiveDisclosures.docx#:~:text=Most Morningstar rankings do not,calculation to reflect those loads.
The impact of a load diminishes, or doesn't, over time depending on how you look at it.
If you buy a fund with a 5% load like SGENX, then the value of your investment will always be 100/105, or about 95.2% as much as it would have been without the load. A 4.8% reduction in value. No matter how many years you hold the investment.
(Though if you sell after just one year, there's an added 1% deferred sales charge, so your investment value is actually reduced to 100/105 x 99/100 = 99/105 or about 94.3% of what it would have been without the loads.)
On the other hand, viewed in terms of (geometric) average annual returns, a 5% load diminishes annual returns by (100/105) ^ (1/number of years).
So over 1 year, the average annual return is multiplied by 95.2% (ignoring backend load). The annual return is reduced by about 4.8%.
While over 5 years, the average annual return is multiplied by (100/105) ^ (1/5) or 99.0%. Annual returns are reduced by about a percent. Because that reduction takes place each year, after five years (and compounding) that adds up to the same 4.8% reduction in final value.
[^ means to the power of, e.g. 10^2 = 100]
To my knowledge, the only return figures we display that are load-adjusted by default are post-tax returns (as I believe the SEC stipulates that calc be load adjusted, if I'm not mistaken).
I hope this is helpful.
Regards,
Jeff Ptak
Morningstar Research Services