Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

FDIC rescinds more than 200 job offers for examiners it needs

Following are edited excerpts from a current Washington Post report:
A government-wide hiring freeze has led the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to yank job offers to more than 200 new examiners, the front-line employees who closely monitor banks to ensure they operate safely and adhere to an extensive rule book.

The FDIC is already facing a staffing challenge, particularly with a lack of examiners, undermining its ability to reduce the risk of bank failures. A chronic shortage of examiners contributed to the failure of Signature Bank, one of three large banks to collapse in 2023, the agency has said.

Examiners are essentially charged with making sure a bank doesn’t fail, a critical function at the roughly 6,000-employee FDIC, of which roughly 2,300 are examiners. The agency oversees about 4,500 banks around the country, most of them small. It also insures trillions of bank deposits and winds down failing banks. Its work is funded through industry assessments.

Perhaps more significantly, the agency is already in need of additional examiners, with frequent turnover and staffing shortages contributing to major setbacks in recent years. Current and former regulators said they feared the situation could snowball if hiring cuts combine with an uptick in the departures of retirement-eligible employees.

A review of the March 2023 failure of Signature Bank found the supervisory group overseeing large financial institutions in the FDIC’s New York office had average vacancies of about 40 percent. For the six years before Signature’s collapse, the FDIC couldn’t adequately staff the team dedicated to the bank.

Comments

  • edited January 27
    Thanks for sharing.

  • slower moving, but possible larger GFC trigger, is making crypto part of mainstream financial institutions (many willing participants as toll takers, not liability holders).
    signs :
    - moving crypto oversight away from SEC (to commodities board w/no enforcement powers).
    - opening up entirely to non-accredited investors.

    u.s. never had a potus, and team, where somesuch has become major\primary store of wealth, and has already placed appointees with unfettered views on such a financial instrument. a bailout via drawing value from other assets would be a foregone conclusion.
  • edited January 27
    Dump is going to push us off a cliff and into the abyss. All safeguards are casually being destroyed.

    Banks need some form of oversight. There should be some transparency. The only reason to do this is to further disrupt and erode our foundation.

    At some point, there has to be some pushback on Dump. The switch from "honeymoon period" to "divorce request" had better happen pronto. Send him one-way back to Jeffrey Epstein's island (rename it Elba Island II), sign him up for one of Musk's test launches....do whatever it takes.
  • +1.
    Toothless opposition.
  • edited January 27
    I can see crypto being the next liar loans, sub-sub prime type debacle and leading to the next crisis down the road. Add: When NFT's come back run for the hills.
  • edited January 28
    The chronic shortage of examiners and government-wide hiring freeze is very concerning.
    The Trump administration's laissez-faire attitude towards crypto is also troubling.
    Trump's meme coin launch was a very opportunistic way to capitalize on his office
    which I found particulary disgusting.
  • CFTC does have enforcement powers. But the regulations for commodities are quite different than those for securities (under SEC). CFTC in its current form has existed since 1974 when various regulatory powers for commodities were consolidated under the CFTC.
    https://www.cftc.gov/About/CFTCOrganization/DOE
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Trading_Commission
  • gman57 said:

    I can see crypto being the next liar loans, sub-sub prime type debacle and leading to the next crisis down the road. Add: When NFT's come back run for the hills.

    It already is. Look into Gemini Earn and the impact of its counterparty risk, which was VERY VERY similar to the GFC and CDOs. I was making *nice* interest on my then-crypto savings but after a few months I really got queasy and got out completely ..... soonafter the 'crypto winter' began and the lawsuits started. Dodged a bullet there, I did since many folks are still waiting to get some/all of their money back.

    FOTUS' recent memecoins are a perfect way of buying influence. All a donor/nation has to do is tell him what their blockchain ID is and he can confirm "their payment was received" --- totally anonymous yet completely 'transparent' in the public ledger.

    The next GFC is going to be epic, I bet.....and it could well happen on FOTUS' watch.



  • yogibullbear, ur correct on CFTC.
    i should have put in the extra effort to clarify no 'effective' enforcement based on its size & budget.
    it is a reasonable guess that the doge proposal to merge CFTC w/SEC is not to increase cumulative resources for enforcement or anything else.
Sign In or Register to comment.