Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

  • msf September 11
Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Morningstar on Active ETFs

edited September 11 in Fund Discussions
Most active ETFs are derivatives-based or factors-based (semi-active) with the old-fashioned stock-picking left for the active mutual funds.
Morningstar may have to create 2 categories of "Active" - Active-Derivatives-based & Active-Stock-picking.
https://www.morningstar.com/funds/will-active-etfs-outnumber-passive-etfs

Comments

  • I'd skipped over this piece because of its title: Will Active ETFs Outnumber Passive ETFs? I don't care. As the article states, number of funds does not equate to AUM, i.e. market share.

    Though as you point out, the piece goes into how these funds invest: what you describe as factor-based, what M* says is like smart beta.

    M* changed its terminology from "smart beta" to "strategic beta". Either way, IMHO both monikers have it backward, i.e. these are "dumb beta" or "mechanical beta" approaches. Some factors are identified and weighted and then applied mechanically. That's a static approach, not an active one. Regardless of how it is marketed.

    As a point of comparison, quant funds build models also. But unlike smart beta (or factors-based if you prefer), they are continually being updated to adapt to evolving markets. There's at least a little "activity" here.

Sign In or Register to comment.