Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

M* JR Defends Standard Deviation (SD)

M* JR Defends Standard Deviation (SD)

The notion of SD is so ancient (and independent of the MPT) that many write it off too easily. M* JR offers 3 points in the defense of SD:

1. JR's own comparative study of Downside Capture and SD concluded that both provide quite similar information. But the SD is much easier to calculate.

2. Don't blame SD for missing hidden risks, black swans, etc. Only deep fundamental analysis can detect those, if at all. Anyway, TR misses that too, so what?

3. SDs moderate over long periods of time. So, 15-yr SD should be lower than 3-yr SD. This is useful in portfolio design.

So, JR seems to be saying that there are more positives than negatives for SD, so quit complaining.

Finally, JR is implicitly referring to the SD of returns, not of prices (used for Bollinger Bands, BBW, etc).

https://www.morningstar.com/columns/rekenthaler-report/standard-deviation-is-an-imperfect-measure-not-useless
Sign In or Register to comment.